
Postuar më parë nga
FATMIR-CUPI
SINQERISHT QE NUK DI NGA TJA FILLOJ. KISHA MENDUAR SE KA KOHE QE SKA ME NJEREZ QE ECIN ME MOTON "SHPIF SHPIF SE DICKA DO MBETET". POR NE KETE FORUM KA SHUME TE TILLE, E JO VETEM TI. PERPARA SE VAZHDOJ ME POSHTE DESHA TE TE LUTEM PER DICKA. TJETER HERE KUR PERPIQESH TE SHKRUASH GJITHE ATO RRESHTA MUNDOHU TE VENDOSESH ME TE RRALLE DHE NDONJE ARGUMENT, SEPSE SIKUR KA ME SHUME LEZET ASHTU.
TANI TE KTHEHEMI TE POSTIMI YT. TY MOR SHOKU NE RRADHE TE PARE,DUKE LENE MENJANE ISLAMIN,TE MUNGOKA NJE NJOHJE SADO E THJESHTE E HISTORISE PERDERISA ME LART THUA SE SHKAKU I NDARJES SONE NE 5 OSE 6 SHTETE (????) QENKA PUSHTIMI TURKO AZIATIKO ISLAM, NJE TERM KY I SHPIKUR NGA TY. SA PER NJE SQARIM TE VOGEL, SIC E DI MIRE TI,TURQIA PERDERI SA NUK KUFIZOHEJ TERRITORIALISHT ME NE PERBENTE NJE RREZIK SHUME ME TE VOGEL SE SA FQINJET TANE DASHAMIRES GREKE DHE SERB, QE MEGJITHESE TE SE NJEJTES "FE" KISHIN DHE CA QELLIME ME FISNIKE, SI PSH ANEKSIMIN E TOKAVE DHE ASIMILIMIN E GJUHES. MUND TE THUHET ME PLOT GOJEN SE NE KOHEN E PUSHTIMIT OSMAN NQS DO TE KISHIM QENE NEN PUSHTIMIN MIQESOR GREK DHE SERB NE O LUM MIKU SOT DO TE KISHIM QENE DUKE FOLUR NE TJETER GJUHE SOT. NEJSE, NUK PO ZGJATEM ME TEJ PASI NUK ESHTE VENDI I DUHUR KETU,PO TA KUJTOVA SA PER MUHABET.
SE DYTI, PERSA I PERKET BIBLIOTEKES SE ALEKSANDRISE, PO TE SJELL NJA DY FAKTE TE VOGLA.
ENCIKLOPEDIA BRITANIKE THOTE SE:
the Alexandrian Library had, in fact, been destroyed much earlier in the fourth century A.D, long before the advent of Islam: “The library survived the disintegration of Alexander?s empire (first century BC) and continued to exist under Roman rule until the third century AD.”3 The truth is that one-half of this library was burnt by Julius Caesar in 47 BC. In the third century, Alexandria came under the domination of Christians. At another place the same work states that, “The main museum and library were destroyed during the civil war of the third century AD and a subsidiary library was burned by Christians in AD 391.
(Encyclopedia Britannica, Vol. 1, 1984, p. 479)
HISTORIANI PHILLIP K. HITTI THOTE SE KJO HISTORI ESHTE:
“is one of those tales that make good fiction but bad history.” “…the great Ptolemic library was burnt as early as 48 BC by Julius Ceasar. A later one, referred to as the daughter library, was destroyed about AD 389 as a result of an edict by the Emperor Theodosius. At the time of the Arab conquest, therefore, no library of importance existed in Alexandria and no contemporary writer ever brought the charge about Amr or Umar.”
(Philip K. Hitti, History of the Arabs, Macmillan: London, 1970, p. 166)
BERNARD LEWIS,NJE KRITIK I ASHPER I ISLAMIT THOTE SE:
“Modern research has shown the story to be completely unfounded. None of the early chronicles, not even the Christian ones, make any reference to this tale, which is mentioned in the 13th century, and in any case the great library of Serapenum had already been destroyed in internal dissensions before the coming of the Arabs.”
(Bernard Lewis, The Arabs in History, Goodword Books: N. Delhi, (1950), 2001, p. 54)
ME VONE AI SHKRUAN:
“not the creation, but the demolition of the myth was achievement of European scholarship, which from the 18th century to the present day has rejected the story as false and absurd, and thus exonerated the Caliph Umar and the early Muslims from this libel.”
(Bernard Lewis, New York Review of Books, 2 September 1990)
DHE PER TA MBYLLUR,COLIN WILLSON NJE SHKRIMTAR INVESTIGUES MJAFT POPULLOR SHPREHET SI ME POSHTE:
“The Library of Alexandria ? which contained, among other things, Aristotle? own collection of books ? was burned down on the orders of the Archbishop of Alexandria (backed by the Emperor Theodosius). Knowledge was evil; had not Adam been evicted from Paradise for wanting to know?”
(Colin Wilson, The Occult, Panther: London, 1984, p. 278 )
PO ASHTU DHE M.N. ROI:
“While books written in the 11th and 12th century indignantly details the shocking tale of the burning of the library of Alexandria, the historians Eustichius and Elmacin, both Egyptian Christians, who wrote soon after the Saracen conquest of their country, are significantly silent about the savage act. The former, a patriarch of Alexandria, could be hardly suspected of partiality to the enemies of Christianity. An order of Caliph Umar has been usually cited as evidence of the barbarous act ascribed to his general. It would have been much easier not to record that order than to suppress any historical work composed by Christian prelates who had endless possibilities of concealing their composition. A diligent examination of all relevant evidence enabled Gibbon to arrive at the following opinion on the matter: ‘The rigid sentence of Omar is repugnant to the sound and orthodox precept of the Mohammedan casuist; they expressly declare that the religious books of the Jews and Christians, which are acquired by the right of war, and that the works of profane scientists, historians or poets, physicians or philosophers, may be lawfully applied to the use of the faithful.’ (The Decline and Fall of Roman Empire)13 Byzantine barbarism had undone the meritorious work of the Ptolemies. The real destruction of the Alexandrian seat of learning had been the work of St. Cyril who defiled the Goddess of learning in the famous fair of Hyparia. That was already in the beginning of the 5th century.
KESHTUQE KUR SHKRUANI, KUSHDOQOFSHI, MOS NA FYENI INTELIGJENCEN ME SHKRIME TE TILLA PA ASNJE LLOJ ARGUMENTI DHE PA ASNJE LLOJ VLERE,SEPSE ME E KEQJA ESHTE SE KUR NUK DENJON TI PERGJIGJESH DIKUJT QE SHKRUAN BUDALLIQE TE TJERET E MARRIN PER MOSMUNDESI ARGUMENTIMI, SI KY KETU ME POSHTE:
si shpjegohet qe asnjehere nuk jepni pergjigje, por vetem sullmoni??? Pse i ftoni njerzit te vnee ne erpdorim llogjiken dhe te mos shohin faktet? Perse ju kini frike te ballafaqoheni me faktet qe Zokoli ju sjell pak me siper?? (DESHMUESI)
Krijoni Kontakt