Dicka me shume nga intervista ne fjale e Janullatos:
TWO FACES OF BISHOP YANNULATOS
Greek Bishop Yannulatos is at this writing a controversial figure in
Albania as the primate of the Autocephalus Orthodox Church of
Albania. There are two facets of the Bishop that might shed light
on and explain why he is controversial.
The following text appeared in the Greek-American weekly, The
Hellenic Chronicle, on Thursday, December 12, 1996:
Athens. Archbishop of Tirana and all Albania Anastasios visited
Greek Prime Minister Costas Simitis recently, saying afterwards
that the Premier is particularly interested in relations in the Balkans
and promotion of cooperation and friendly communication among
Balkan countries. Anastasios said he has been in Albania for some
five and a half years to restore the Autocephalus Orthodox Church
of Albania and to promote friendship, cooperation and mutual
understanding. "Consequently" he added, "the exchange of views
and opinions in such a climate is always useful''. Asked whether
relations with the Tirana government have been improved, the
archbishop sad "there is a course of improvement in relations".
Bishop Yannulatos is indeed the official Archbishop of
Albania, but he is not an Albanian national or citizen. If the
Archbishop of Albania were an Albanian national and a citizen of
Albania this type of meeting could never have happened. The late
Albanian Archbishop K. Kisi (prior to the Communist regime)
never met with the Greek premier or any other premier outside
Albania during his whole tenure as the Primate of the Autocephalus
Orthodox Church of Albania. In the past few months Bishop
Yannulatos has met twice with Premier Simitis and at least once
with the Greek Foreign Minister Pangalos. It is critical to note,
however, that Bishop Yannulatos, as a Greek national and citizen
could not and cannot represent Albanian interests with any foreign
power.
Bishop Yannulatos is not content with the support he gets
from the Greek Ecumenical Patriarch in Istanbul (See Illyria,
September, 16-18, 1996) and from other religious institutions. For
reasons best known to himself, Bishop Yannulatos needs to enlist
the support of the Greek government in order to shore up his shaky
status in Albania. It seems that Bishop Yannulatos is attempting to
inject his agenda into the foreign policy of the Greek government.
However, both Premier Simitis and Foreign Minister Pangalos
know that it is in Greece's best interest to collaborate with the
countries of the South Balkans in the development of democratic
processes, to participate in their economic development by
supporting Greek investment and businesses in the region and
eventually lead those countries into the European Union. Also, they
know that religion in Albania, as in Greece and elsewhere, is
entirely an internal Albanian matter not subject to intervention by
an outside government. Premier Simitis and Foreign Minister
Pangalos both know that the Greek government is the single most
important factor and player in maintaining the peace in the South
Balkan region. Albania, Macedonia, Bulgaria and Serbia simply do
not have the wherewithal both economically and militarily to cause
any serious upheaval in the area.
I submit that the enlightened leaders of Greece do know that
Bishop Yannulatos is the temporary leader of the Orthodox Church
in Albania because the statutes of the Albanian Church require that
the Primate be an Albanian national as well as a citizen of Albania.
Furthermore, for the theologically minded, it is noted that the
continued presence of Bishop Yannulatos in Albania is in violation
of Canon 34 of the Eastern Orthodox Church which requires that
the bishops and the leaders of the Orthodox faithful be indigenous
to the country where the church is located.
In the early 90's there was the excuse that no Albanian
Bishop lived to lead the Church. Today, there are at least two
Albanian candidates:
Arqimandrit Theofan Koja
Arqimandrit Joan Pelushi
Yet, Bishop Yannulatos is still waiting for the other three Greek
Bishops that the Ecumenical Patriarchate would send him, except
for the refusal of the Albanian government.
However, in order to better understand the behavior of the
bishop it is necessary to look at the other face of Bishop
Yannulatos, the one who gave an interview to author Fred A. Reed,
as quoted in his book Salonica Terminus (Talonbooks, 1996) about
the religious situation in Albania. In pages 118 through 120 of the
book the following passages are found:
Hoxha wanted uniformity, domination. He claimed he was an
internationalist but what he really did was to build up "AIbanicity".
. . The problem, the reverend hints darkly, lowering his voice
further still to a whisper, as the television cackles in the
background, is that key agencies of the Albanian government are in
the hands of what he terms "Muslim Fundamentalists" who see the
Orthodox community as a tough nut which must be cracked.
[According to Yannulatos] "There are powerful anti-orthodox
forces who want to strengthen Muslim communities. They want to
establish the first Islamic republic in Europe right here, a greater
Albania which would include Kosova and a part of Macedonia.
Clearly there is Turkish influence at work here as well. People in
the West have to understand that Islam is essentially a political
religion".
Thus, Bishop Yannulatos is not content with the support he
may have received from Greek Premier Costas Simitis and now
wants to enlist the support of the whole West for his untenable
position. He wants us to believe that Albanian nationalism
(Albanicity?) and fundamental Islamism will take over Christian
Europe if Bishop Yannulatos is not allowed to continue to reign
over the Albanian Orthodox Church.
I suggest that the West be leery of Bishop Yannulatos. The
face he shows with the friendly words one reads in the Hellenic
Chronicle are a cover for his real face of fanatical and bigoted
beliefs he harbors against all other religions in Albania.
I find it preposterous that he would accuse President Sali
Berisha of supporting Islamic fundamentalism in general and
particularly in Albania. This same accusation has been aimed
against President Berisha by Nicholas Gage, head of the
Panepirotic Society in America, and no friend of Albania.
Yannulatos' "people in the West" should know that since
1992 when Bishop Yannulatos was installed as Archbishop of
Albania, there has never been a single word uttered nor written by
any legitimate organization or a serious individual against the
Orthodox Church in Albania. All uttered words and written
material have addressed the person of Bishop Yannulatos having
been installed as Archbishop inappropriately in 1992 even though
initially, in 1991, the Albanians were hopeful when he arrived in
Albania as a temporary exarch of the Patriarchate, and with the
approval of Ramiz Alia, then President of Albania. (Cultural
Survival Quarter/y, Summer, 1995, p. 63)
"The People in the West" know that the Albanians in Kosova
have never made a single claim to Islamic fundamentalism for their
aspirations to be a free people from Serbian suppression. Bishop
Yannulatos would be the first prominent individual to blemish the
clear record of peaceful resistance by the Albanians in Kosova led
by President Ibrahim Rugova.
I personally regret that Bishop Yannulatos made such
statements to Fred A. Reed. I was born a Moslem and grew up in
the Orthodox quarter of Uzgur in Berat. My home was next door to
the Orthodox Cathedral. We children, orthodox and Moslem,
played and studied together. I enjoyed the colorful Easter eggs and
the ceremonial sweet wheat. Bishop Yannulatos' remarks belie the
memories of my youth which sustained me through 45 years of
exile in the United States.
None of us wants another Bosnia in Albania. However, we
may not be complacent with the historical past of the Albanians
who have shown generosity of spirit and friendly understanding in
matters of religion. Instead, we should heed the findings of
Professor Michael P. Scharf which indicates that "the violence in
Bosnia was not the product of unstoppable historic forces as some
have suggested. . . The ethnic hatred that emerged in 1992 was
engineered, not innate". (Boston Sunday Globe, December 1. 1996)
The statements made by the Bishop tend to be "luring out
humanity's dark side" [Scharf] in Albania. Bishop Yannulatos and
his cohorts are undermining the fiber of Albanian society which
could lead in the future to religious/ethnic strife. Surely this is not
the vision of the future for Albania and the European Union.
In a diplomatic setting, Bishop Yannulatos' behavior would
have given cause to the host country to declare him persona non
grata. However, whether Bishop Yannulatos stays in Albania or
goes back to Greece, he owes an apology to President Berisha, an
apology to the Albanian government and an apology to the
Albanian people in Albania and the diaspora.
Wayland, Massachusetts
December. 1996
Sejfi Protopapa
Krijoni Kontakt