Tybe ky postimi yt, ma i pakumtimtė e ma KOT ''zor'' me gjete najkun.Postuar mė parė nga G.S.Vangjeli
Tybe ky postimi yt, ma i pakumtimtė e ma KOT ''zor'' me gjete najkun.
Ndryshuar pėr herė tė fundit nga Adna : 03-12-2010 mė 10:19
Paqė
Bust ty nuk te nxinet per te madhe se e di qe nuk ki ndjenja, bile as kur vriten femije te kujt do qofshin ato.
Ndryshuar pėr herė tė fundit nga Adna : 03-12-2010 mė 10:52
Paqė
I perzive me Izraelitet dhe Saddamin me siguri. Mungese te informacioneve gjenden cdokund..
Palestinezet nuk kane kurrefar lidhje me Serbet, kjo ishte e para..
E dyta. Pas SHBA'se, eshte pikerisht Serbia qe shet arme me shume Izraelit.
E treta ka qen Saddami qe ka qen i afert me Serbine, e jo Palestinezet.
E katerta. Izraelitet kurre nuk kane qen mik me Shqiptaret, krahas qe Shqiptaret e kane ruajtur ata ne Luften e dyte boterore.
Kurrefar baza nuk ka fjalia jote qe thote "Nese ti don Palestinezet ateher ti je proserb". Te kunderten "Nese ti don Izraelitet je proserb".
Mund te hap dhe une nje teme qe u vrane 1 milion femije dje. Po ne fillim do diskutohet ne eshte e vertete. Jo te filloni si budallenj, ua sa gjynaf, 1 milion femije, te shkretat nena etj etj
Muhamedi urdheroi vrasjen e nenes se pese femijeve Asma bint Marwan , e cila u ther ne gjume nga nje kriminel mysliman i quajtur Umayr .
Cfare ke per te thene per kete vrasje ti adna hipokritja ?
Ndryshuar pėr herė tė fundit nga daniel00 : 03-12-2010 mė 13:23
Ngjeshur me brezin e se vertetės,parzmoren e drejtėsisė,mburojėn e besimit dhe shpatėn e Frymės.
Kam per te qe nuk e besoj nje gje te tille!
Ku e ke lexu, a ku e ke ni?
Paqė
Po, edhe une e mora me rezerve kete gje, (edhe pse e di qe Sharoni eshte ne gjendje ta bej dicka te tille).
Ajo qe shkrova une ke qe antaret ktu nuk thane qe kjo so e vertete, ama kishin shkru bdallakina sa qe edhe pse kryeministri vret femije, kta thone, ''pse cka na lidh neve me palistinez...'' E marrzira tjera shkrujne.
S'ka rendesi a eshte shqiptar, palestinez, francez...etj ckadoqofshin femijet NUK DUHET TE PREKEN AS ME GISHTIN MA TE VOGEL, E LE MO TE VRITEN!
Paqė
sionistet jane me te keqi se nacistet,Ore ē keni qe shprehni ndjenja urreje ndaj palestinezve qe lufton per te mbijetuar si komb ne token e vet ,me kete nuk tregoni asgje tjeter ,veēse poshtersin e thelle te shpirtit qe keni...,ju ka hyre e keqja ne palce dhe nuk dalloni dot viktimen nga xhelati...
Zoti qofte me ju!!
Ndryshuar pėr herė tė fundit nga bindi : 03-12-2010 mė 18:43
Google me ate emer te jep me mijera rezultate po megjithate ketu eshte historia dhe referencat e librit dhe te autorit .
http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Asma_bint_Marwan
Ngjeshur me brezin e se vertetės,parzmoren e drejtėsisė,mburojėn e besimit dhe shpatėn e Frymės.
Artikull nga revista Foreign Policy nga Jonathan Schanzer
A Palestinian State Means War
Why Abbas shouldn't go unilateral.
With the U.S.-led peace process looking increasingly moribund, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has begun enlisting foreign leaders in a dangerous effort to recognize a Palestinian state without Israel's agreement. Abbas and his prime minister, Salam Fayyad, began this effort earlier this year to strengthen the Palestinian negotiating position, and it is bearing more fruit than even he could have expected. Abbas, however, should be careful what he wishes for. A declaration of statehood without Israeli approval could start a war in which the Palestinians themselves would pay the highest price.
Abbas has been laying the diplomatic groundwork for a unilateral declaration of statehood for months, visiting foreign capitals and lobbying governments to extend recognition. But his efforts have gained momentum this month as a U.S. proposal for an Israeli settlement freeze has fallen apart.
On Dec. 5, Abbas visited Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan in Ankara. Afterward, the Palestinian envoy to Turkey announced that Erdogan would recognize a Palestinian state (within the 1967 borders) at an unspecified time. Erdogan also reportedly promised to go to bat for the initiative with other heads of state. The territory in question includes both the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip and the Fatah-led West Bank, with the presumption (no doubt invoking the ire of Hamas) that the West Bank leadership would be in charge.
In recent days, several other countries have made similar declarations. In response to a request from Abbas, outgoing Brazilian President Luiz Inįcio Lula da Silva declared last week that his country recognized the state of Palestine based on the 1967 borders. On Dec. 6, Uruguay announced that it would do the same, and Argentine President Cristina Fernįndez de Kirchner also wrote to Abbas that her country recognizes a "free and independent" Palestine. On Dec. 8, after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu refused a U.S. request to extend the moratorium on construction in West Bank settlements and Abbas withdrew from peace talks, Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit reportedly insisted that discussions should transition to an "end game for a Palestinian settlement."
Almost 100 countries already recognize an independent Palestine, and it is unclear how many others Abbas has asked to sign on to his plan of a unilateral declaration. Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat has approached U.N. and European officials, demanding that they force Israel to stop imposing "facts on the ground" in the West Bank. Meanwhile, Abbas advisor Nimer Hammad openly states that the Palestinians are considering a plan whereby the United Nations would approve of a Palestinian state in the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and East Jerusalem. Although U.S. officials oppose a unilateral declaration of Palestinian statehood, Barack Obama's administration has not denounced these efforts.
Although a unilateral Palestinian declaration of statehood is a seemingly attractive alternative to negotiations and is gaining credence among a growing group of countries, it is an almost surefire recipe for war. If the Palestinian government unilaterally claims land where an estimated 400,000 Israeli settlers currently reside in the West Bank, don't expect them simply to pull up and move, especially if they were not consulted on the matter. Expect them to fight.
From there, a border dispute with Israel becomes inevitable. And in the Middle East, border disputes are not settled through binding arbitration. Another military conflict is sure to follow. We can expect the Iran-sponsored proxies Hezbollah and Hamas to launch new rounds of rocket attacks, and perhaps even a military assault from the Palestinian territories.
The United States and European Union are clearly worried about this possibility. They have already trained some 3,000 Palestinian soldiers who have successfully maintained calm in the West Bank in recent months. That has allowed Israel to rapidly redeploy its forces out of the West Bank, where Israeli troop levels are now at their lowest levels since after the outbreak of the first intifada in 1987. Ironically, this means the new Palestinian security forces can more easily deploy to various corners of the West Bank to defend Abbas's territorial claims.
Even if it did not result in an open war with Israel, a unilateral declaration of statehood would probably not do the Palestinians any favors. The move could unify the warring Hamas and Fatah factions -- as the second intifada against Israel did briefly when the peace process unraveled in 2000 -- but it could also divide them further. In the wake of a unilateral declaration of a Palestinian state, the two factions will almost certainly square off over who constitutes the sovereign government.
Yet with more and more countries recognizing a Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza, what began as a seemingly empty threat to squeeze concessions from Israel has gained traction and appears increasingly likely to become a reality. A two-state solution may be around the corner, but that doesn't mean peace will follow.
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/article...tate_means_war
Il Club Pił Titolato Al Mondo
Regullat e Postimit
Krijoni Kontakt