qe tju them te drejten me behet qefji kur lexoj keto shkrimet dhe dini cfare me lindi nje ide.
pasi me duhet te dorezoj nje business plan brenda 2 javesh do tju isha shume mirenjohes qe je JU te shkrini talentin dhe experiencen tuaj duke me ndihmuar me kete business plan.
pasi e di qe shumica juaj ose po studjon ne kete fushe ose ka mbaruar studimet dhe aktualisht ka gjetur nje "pune " te mire.
nqs do te ndihmoni ju lutem me dergoni E-mail ne adresen time.
ju faleminderit te gjitheve.
mateo
Mateo, you so funny man, me fall back from laughin, laughin, laughin. Please, mercy on me man, me can't stop laughin at you.
P.S. Nuk behet byrek me miell hua, maksimumi mund ti hedhesh nje erez por jo me teper.
Ndryshuar pėr herė tė fundit nga visitor : 01-07-2002 mė 22:42
I got a few business plans. One is international. Introducing Victoria's Secret in Turkey. Ne kete perfshihet edhe nje "Fisibility Study".
Kurse tjetra business plan kam, Opening of a new Romantic restaurant on the Detroit River. (Few Million Dollar project) Sa nuk e beme realitet. Both projects have been done within the last 2 years.
E-mail me or MP if you need anything, or if I can help maybe on how to go about it on finding the info.
Vizitor nga e gjen kohen qe shkruan gjithe keto argumenta ketu, me lodhe duke lexuar a jo me duke shtypur.
Mateo
Uroj qe te kesh kontaktuar me Estellen dhe ajo te kete arritur te te ndihmoje.
Une nuk kam bere ndonjehere nje plan te tille e prandaj nuk do te mundesha te te mbaroja pune, por nese as materialet e Estelles nuk te hyjne ne pune, mund te me kontaktosh edhe mua, te shohim se mos arrij te te ndihmoj.
Faktikisht po te shikoj profilin tend duhet te pyes une ty se si e gjen gjithe kete kohe qe shkruan pasi tani qe po shkruaj ti ke 6.31 poste ne dite, ndersa une vetem 1.6.Postuar mė parė nga Estella
Vizitor nga e gjen kohen qe shkruan gjithe keto argumenta ketu, me lodhe duke lexuar a jo me duke shtypur.
Visitor,
Desha te te falenderoj per link-et!
Ishin vertet informuese, sidomos ai me timeline qe prej viti 1998.
Edhe para se te lexoja ne keto linke, une nuk kisha dyshim se politika monetare e U.S. dhe e ECB nuk eshte e njejte. Nuk ka sesi per arsye se madhesia e ekonomive nuk eshte e njejte dhe qellimet qe ato kane ne baze jane te ndryshme. ECB qe me krijimin e saj, si kusht per futjen e vendeve ne Euro kishte mbajtjen e inflacionit nen kontroll dhe jep alarmin posa ve re qe rrezikohet qellimi kryesor. Pra une ne vemendje e kam pasur qe me pare qe ECB ka politike tjeter, megjithate ajo ndjek zhvillimet e Amerikes, sepse ate e ka si fanar drejtues packa se mund te hiqen sikur kane politike te pavarur.
Pershtypje ne linkun per timeline dhe Greenspan interventions me bene dy fakte:
- Sept.22 - Joint ECB, FED, BOJ intervention to prop up the Euro
- June 28 - Fed, ECB, and BOJ in co-ordinated intervention to support Dollar against Yen
Pra qe ata bashkeveprojne per te stimuluar njeren apo tjetren monedhe.
Ti shkruan
Po, per t'u ruajtur nga rreziku i ndryshimit te spot rates investoret veprojne permes futures, te pakten teorikisht kete e di, ajo qe do te deshiroja te dija (dhe ketu mund te me ndihmosh nese ke eksperience praktike) eshte se ne c'mase jane te perfshire futures ne ruajtjen prej ketyre ndryshimeve. Veprimtaria e tyre ne treg ndikon edhe ne ecurine e interest rates sot, pra une do te mendoja qe ndikon qe edhe ECB apo Fed te veprojne ne nje drejtim te caktuar e te ndryshojne ekuilibrin e tregut sot (me korrigjo nese gaboj!).Sado qe spot rate/cmimi aktual mund te ndryshoje shpejt duhet te kesh parasysh qe nje pjese shume e madhe e monedhave nuk tregtohen ne moment por me "futures", kontrata te cilat zbatohen ne te ardhmen. Psh ne nje kontrate te ketille ti bie dakort me nje person qe pas 2 muajsh te blesh dollare me cmimin 1.01 Euro per dollar. Nqs ndodh ai rasti qe permenda me siper ti sapo fitove 0.09 Euro per cdo dollar qe bleve. Nje instrument i ketille e eliminon disi aftesine niveluese te tregut sepse cmimet jane te vendosura qe me pare.
Per nderhyrjen drejtuar Estelles jemi te nje mendje atehere.
A jam shprehur une se ai analist eshte neutral. Nese po atehere jam gabuar, nese jo atehere i gabuar mbetesh ti.Atehere si mund te jete neutral ai/ata nqs ka eufori per perparimin e Euros? Ndersa persa i perket analistit qe punonte per Goldman Sachs do te doja thjesht te te kujtoja qe shumica DERRMUESE e analisteve kane qene gabim ne parashikimet e tyre keto dy vitet e fundit. Ai analisti mund te kete qene edhe ndonje si tipi i Henry Blodget i Merrill Lynch i cili u quajt "Mbreti i internetit" per parashikimet e tij dhe qe pastaj u largua me turp nga puna kur sektori qe mbulonte ra (thjesht nje shembull per analistet)
Per rolin e analisteve do te thosha se eshte i madh, pavaeresisht se ne treg mund te kete zhvillime krejtesisht te kunderta me ato qe bejne ata, e keto mund te jene per arsye krejtesisht te paparishikueshme. E atehere fajtore nuk jane ata.
Nese parashikimet jane kryekeput gabim atehere ata jane fajtore.
(Do te lutesha te na tregoje ketu me shume per Henry Blodget!)
Puna e analisteve ndikon tregun sic e ndikon per shembull edhe puna e rating agencies. Megjithate une i shoh te nevojshem se orientojne pak a shume investoret (edhe i manipulojne).
Euro nuk eshte me nje eksperiment. Euro eshte nje realitet i cili jo vetem qe nuk mohohet dot, por perkundrazi do te jete me ne per shume e shume dekada ne te ardhmen, ne mos per gjithnje. Problemi eshte qe dollarit ju deshen 200 vjet, dhe dy luftera boterore per te arritur ketu ku eshte. Une per vete s'jam i zoti te parashikoj se c'do te ndodhi pas 200 vjeteve me Euron dhe Dollarin, keshtu qe e shikoj ne terma me te shkurter.
Ndoshta pikerisht ai fakt qe ti ve ne dukje Visitor (se dollarit iu deshen 200 vjet e dy luftera boterore per te arritur ketu ku eshte) qe me lejon, ndoshta pa te drejte, ta quaj EURO-n akoma nje eksperiment. Suksesi i tij pritet akoma te shihet. Fakti qe Anglia shmang akoma futjen ne Euro eshte dicka, fakti qe Zvicra shtyn futjen ne EU eshte nje tjeter. Por eshte per t'u pare.
Dhe ne fund:
Te lutem merr pjese gjeresisht ne forum Visitor!Pikerisht, ketu jemi per te mesuar. Dhe duke te stimuluar, duke te kundershtuar me argumenta ti do te shkruash dhe tregosh argumentat e tua me te mira, gje qe do te jete ne te mire tenden dhe timen. Ekonomia eshte nje shkence argumentash, kush me mund me argumenta ka respektin tim maksimal, kush s'ja arrin dot e respektoj si qenie njerzore por jo si ekonomist/e.
Pershendetje!
Dita
Sa per artikujt e biznesit e gjej kohen i lexoj por pak a shume shmang veten nga pergjigjet dhe sidomos ato te gjatat, sepse po te nis dhe te argumentoj dhe te sjell fakte do te kisha mbase 10 ose me shume poste ne dite.
poste mbase kam 6.1 ne dite por artikujt apo opinionet e mia nuk jane shume te gjata. E kisha fjalen qe ti kur shpjegon dicka shkruan gjate.
Nejse mo me pelqen qe u beme disa persona per te sjelle informacion se tani me shtyhen kembet me shume per te ardhur ne forum dhe diskutuar dhe mesuar per ekonomine e sotme.
mateo me njofto po qe se te duhem edhe pergjigje tek m.p te kam kethyer.
Dita te them te drejten nuk e di se c'perqindje te tregut zene "Futures/kontratat e ardhshme" ne krahasim me shkembimet e momentit. Nga te gjithe shembujt qe kam lexuar neper libra kam pare qe perdoren ne mase, qe nga Volkswagen, deri tek Toronto Blue Jays (nje skuader ice hokey).
Persa i perket qe FED dhe ECB i marrin parasysh futures kur vendosin perqindjet e interesit do te thosha qe keto dy institucione veprojne kryesisht me qellime ekonomike ne mendje, por perseri nuk do ta perjashtoja mundesine qe te nderhynin per te ruajtur kurset e kembimit.
A jam shprehur une se ai analist eshte neutral. Nese po atehere jam gabuar, nese jo atehere i gabuar mbetesh ti.
Postuar nga ty me date 21/05/02:
Por mua me pelqyen argumentat sqaruese qe kish sjelle ekonomisti gjerman. Besoj se ai vete ben pjese tek ata qe jane optimiste per ecurine e euros, megjithate analizen e kishte bere neutrale.
Persa i perket Henry Blodget, me vjen keq qe s'kam kohe ta perkthej artikullin e meposhtem por me dy fjale per ata qe s'e dine Blodget ishte nje ish-gazetar i deshtuar i cili tha nje fjale nje dite per Amazon.com dhe parashikoi qe cmimi i aksioneve te kompanise do te arrinte $400. Kur cmimi ne treg kaloi $400 Blodget u be hero, dhe "mbreti i aksioneve te internetit". Pas renies te NASDAQ Merryll Lynch i dha duart Blodget, dhe tani Henry i eshte kthyer profesionit te vjeter te gazetarise, ka thene qe do te shkruaj nje liber per te pershkruar ate qe ndodhi.
Aktualisht eshte hedhur ne gjyq se bashku me Merryll per mashtrim te investitoreve.
November 15, 2001
Henry Blodget Leaves Merrill Lynch
By Thor Olavsrud
Henry Blodget, Merrill Lynch's star Internet analyst, confirmed Wednesday that he accepted a buyout offer from the firm, according to a New York Times report. Merrill Lynch had made the offer to about 50,000 of its employees this month.
Blodget's severance package is estimated to be worth about $2 million, the Times said.
The 35-year-old analyst became an overnight sensation on Wall Street in 1998, when he correctly predicted the share price of Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN) would rocket to $400 off its then-price of $240 a share. It was not long before his fame spread among investors, and in 2000 he was the highest-ranked analyst in an annual survey by Institutional Investor magazine.
He was oft-quoted by financial reporters, and appeared even more regularly on CNBC, recommending nearly every one of the more than 20 stocks he covered, from IPET Holdings' Pets.com, to eToys.
But as the tech bubble burst, one after another of the companies Blodget had pushed tanked. His portfolio shrank to only a few stocks as companies either went out of business or were delisted when their stocks fell below $1 on the market.
Blodget said he always advised clients that tech stocks were risky but that did not stop the grumbles. Merrill Lynch settled a complaint by one customer, who had bought shares of online content provider InfoSpace on Blodget's recommendation, for an undisclosed amount earlier this year. Although it settled, Merrill continued to dispute the complaint and continued to support Blodget, The Times reported.
The complaint was one that has been heard all around Wall Street in past months and is by no means confined to Merrill Lynch. Investors and regulators have questioned whether firms crossed the line when analysts were pushing stocks of companies with which their employers were trying to do business.
In the wake of the bubble, many firms, Merrill among them, have announced policy changes intended to reassure investors that their analysts' opinions are based on objective research. Analysts are now required to disclose their own holdings and may not acquire shares in the companies they follow. The firms also said they would disclose investment relationships with the companies their analysts follow.
According to The Times, Blodget plans to spend the next several months writing a book about the Internet stock bubble for Random House, and will then seek a job at a hedge fund or money management firm.
Estella, mua thjesht (si shqiptareve ne pergjithsi) me pelqen te llap gjere e gjate prandaj postet e mia jane carcaf. Problemi eshte qe jo gjithmone "quantity=quality" por ketu jemi per te diskutuar per qejf.
Qenkam gabuar une atehere visitor
Falemnderit per artikullin!
FOREIGN EXCHANGE
Euro Shies Away From Parity With Dollar Midday in Europe
By NICHOLAS HASTINGS
DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
LONDON -- The euro has once again stepped back from pushing up through parity against the dollar, despite early momentum that had helped it rise to $0.9968.
Near midday, the euro was trading back down at $0.9941, only slightly above $0.9934 late Tuesday in New York.
The initial rise in the single currency was aided by the latest bout of bad news from the U.S., including President Bush's failure to lift market confidence in corporate America and the latest poor earnings reports that left the Dow Jones Industrial Average 1.9% lower Tuesday.
Suggestions that the problem of questionable accounting practices will lead to changes in U.S. regulation has increased the risk that U.S. business in general will find itself more hampered by legislation in the future.
However, the news out of the euro zone wasn't so good either. After disappointing jobless, industrial production and sentiment data out of Germany Tuesday, the market had another reason to assume that German growth won't live up to expectations Wednesday. This helped to counter what was already a pretty weak upward momentum and left the euro failing to break parity once again.
The dollar managed little better against the yen, with fear of Bank of Japan intervention failing to stop its slide under „118. Some suggested that a new exercise may have been delayed because the person at the Ministry of Finance for masterminding intervention has changed jobs, and it may take time for the new person to settle in. The dollar managed to decline as far as „117.79, well below the „ 117.94 level registered late in New York Tuesday.
It also fell against sterling, helped by news that United Kingdom manufacturing output had risen much more than expected last month. May output rose 0.7%, instead of the 0.3% the market had forecast. The pound advanced to $1.5517 from $1.5482.
Write to Nicholas Hastings at nick.hastings@dowjones.com
Updated July 10, 2002 8:23 a.m. EDT
Regullat e Postimit
Pėrgjigju Duke Cituar
Krijoni Kontakt