Kloridektomi per femrat

**laguna blu** · 28-12-2004, 17:39

U rrah kjo temë shpesh po: ablazion dmth shprishje, ekscizion dmth prerje dhe mutilacion ështe sakatim. Ndoshta kjo shprehja e fundit e shpjegon më së miri synetinë e femrave. Është "zbuluar" për të ulur epshin femnor (klitorisi është pjesa e trupit me më së shumti mbaresa nervore që don të thotë edhe më e ekspozuara në ekscitim) e rrjedhimisht për të rritur besnikërine e femrës. Që të evitohet kjo mashkulli duhet të jetë më inteligjent, më i ndjeshëm dhe seksualisht më aktiv kështu që femra nuk ka nevojë të kërkojë dikah tjetër kënaqësite e saja legjitime, qofshin ato fizike apo sentimentale.
Ndërsa synetija tek mashkujt ka vetëm efekte pozitive si: pastërtinë më të madhe të penisit sepse mashkulli i pabërë synet ka infeksione më të shpeshta të prepuciumit (lëkura që mbulon glans penis apo kokën) por synetia e shtyn edhe kohen e ejakulimit të tij sepse kur është i pabërë synet eksitimet eventuale nga prepuciumi janë më të pranishme dhe kjo ndikon sado pak në kohëgjatësine apo kohëshkurtësinë e ejakulimit e cila kryesisht ndikohet nga faktorë psikologjik.
Është shembull flagrant i pabarazisë, imponuar nga logjika e forcës dhe detyrimit por në të njëjtën kohë pastërtia e penisit e mbron edhe femrën nga infeksionet banale të cilave ajo u është ekspozuar më tepër nga shkaku i konfiguracionit natyror të vagjinës (sidomos myshqet, këpurdhat e bakterje të ndryshme)...
laguna blu

**R2T** · 28-12-2004, 19:22

Nuk po perpiqem ti perkthej te gjitha, por interneti eshte i mbushur me panevojshemrine e synetit. Te gjitha tezat e meparshme te pastertise tashme hidhen poshte, dhe cka po del ne pah eshte se syneti eshte po aq i demshem per mashkullin sa ai i femres.

Syneti shkateron nje pjese te zones erogjene Pra meshkujt e bere synet jane me pak te ndjeshem.
Circumcision Results in Significant Loss of Erogenous Tissue

A report published in the British Journal of Urology assessed the type and amount of tissue missing from the adult circumcised penis by examining adult foreskins obtained at autopsy. Investigators found that circumcision removes about one-half of the erogenous tissue on the penile shaft. The foreskin, according to the study, protects the head of the penis and is comprised of unique zones with several kinds of specialized nerves that are important to optimum sexual sensitivity.

Taylor, J. et al., "The Prepuce: Specialized Mucosa of the Penis and Its Loss to Circumcision," BJU 77 (1996): 291–295.

Syneti ndikon ne sjelljen seksuale
Circumcision Affects Sexual Behavior

A study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that circumcision provided no significant prophylactic benefit and that circumcised men were more likely to engage in various sexual practices. Specifically, circumcised men were significantly more likely to masturbate and to participate in heterosexual oral sex than uncircumcised men.

Laumann, E. et al., "Circumcision in the U.S.: Prevalence, Prophylactic Effects, and Sexual Practice," JAMA 277 (1997): 1052–1057.

Circumcision Policy Influenced by Psychosocial Factors

The debate about the advisability of circumcision in English-speaking countries typically has focused on potential health factors. The position statements of committees from national medical organisations are expected to be evidence-based; however, the contentiousness of the ongoing debate suggests that other factors are involved. Various potential factors related to psychology, sociology, religion, and culture may also underlie policy decisions. These factors could affect the values and attitudes of medical committee members, the process of evaluating the medical literature, and the medical literature itself. Although medical professionals highly value rationality, it can be difficult to conduct a rational and objective evaluation of an emotional and controversial topic such as circumcision. A negotiated compromise between polarized committee factions could introduce additional psychosocial factors. These possibilities are speculative, not conclusive. It is recommended that an open discussion of psychosocial factors take place and that the potential biases of committee members be recognized.

Goldman, R., “Circumcision Policy: A Psychosocial Perspective,” Paediatrics & Child Health 9 (2004): 630-633.

Circumcision is Not Good Health Policy

A cost-utility analysis, based on published data from multiple observational studies, comparing boys circumcised at birth and those not circumcised was undertaken using the Quality of Well-being Scale, a Markov analysis, the standard reference case, and a societal perspective. Neonatal circumcision increased incremental costs by $828.42 per patient and resulted in an incremental 15.30 well-years lost per 1000 males. If neonatal circumcision was cost-free, pain-free, and had no immediate complications, it was still more costly than not circumcising. Using sensitivity analysis, it was impossible to arrange a scenario that made neonatal circumcision cost-effective. Neonatal circumcision is not good health policy, and support for it as a medical procedure cannot be justified financially or medically.

Van Howe, R., “A Cost-Utility Analysis of Neonatal Circumcision,” Medical Decision Making 24 (2004):584-601.

Circumcision Results in Significant Loss of Erogenous Tissue

A report published in the British Journal of Urology assessed the type and amount of tissue missing from the adult circumcised penis by examining adult foreskins obtained at autopsy. Investigators found that circumcision removes about one-half of the erogenous tissue on the penile shaft. The foreskin, according to the study, protects the head of the penis and is comprised of unique zones with several kinds of specialized nerves that are important to optimum sexual sensitivity.

Taylor, J. et al., "The Prepuce: Specialized Mucosa of the Penis and Its Loss to Circumcision," BJU 77 (1996): 291–295.

Circumcision Affects Sexual Behavior

A study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that circumcision provided no significant prophylactic benefit and that circumcised men were more likely to engage in various sexual practices. Specifically, circumcised men were significantly more likely to masturbate and to participate in heterosexual oral sex than uncircumcised men.

Laumann, E. et al., "Circumcision in the U.S.: Prevalence, Prophylactic Effects, and Sexual Practice," JAMA 277 (1997): 1052–1057.

Shkencetaret, demonstrojne efektet traumatizuese te synetit
Researchers Demonstrate Traumatic Effects of Circumcision

A team of Canadian researchers produced new evidence that circumcision has long-lasting traumatic effects. An article published in the international medical journal The Lancet reported the effect of infant circumcision on pain response during subsequent routine vaccination. The researchers tested 87 infants at 4 months or 6 months of age. The boys who had been circumcised were more sensitive to pain than the uncircumcised boys. Differences between groups were significant regarding facial action, crying time, and assessments of pain.

The authors believe that "neonatal circumcision may induce long-lasting changes in infant pain behavior because of alterations in the infant’s central neural processing of painful stimuli." They also write that "the long-term consequences of surgery done without anaesthesia are likely to include post-traumatic stress as well as pain. It is therefore possible that the greater vaccination response in the infants circumcised without anaesthesia may represent an infant analogue of a post-traumatic stress disorder triggered by a traumatic and painful event and re-experienced under similar circumstances of pain during vaccination."

Taddio, A. et al., "Effect of Neonatal Circumcision on Pain Response during Subsequent Routine Vaccination," The Lancet 349 (1997): 599–603.

Syneti ndalohet per arsye te traumes.
Circumcision Study Halted Due to Trauma

Researchers found circumcision so traumatic that they ended the study early rather than subject any more infants to the operation without anesthesia. Those infants circumcised without anesthesia experienced not only severe pain, but also an increased risk of choking and difficulty breathing. The findings were published in the Journal of the American Medical Association. Up to 96% of infants in some areas of the United States receive no anesthesia during circumcision. No anesthetic currently in use for circumcisions is effective during the most painful parts of the procedure.

Lander, J. et al., "Comparison of Ring Block, Dorsal Penile Nerve Block, and Topical Anesthesia for Neonatal Circumcision," JAMA 278 (1997): 2157–2162.

Nje nga arsyet kryesore pse syneti mbrohet me kaq zell eshte se te berit synet duan te ndihen me mire per veten e tyre.

Faqja e plote eshte ketu : http://www.circumcision.org/studies.htm

Ndersa informacion i plote per synetin dhe efektet negative te tij gjendet ketu: http://www.circumcision.org/

**laguna blu** · 28-12-2004, 20:05

Ndoshta për këto arësye që shtroni ju, edhe një pjesë e përkatësisë fetare katolike tashmë sipas udhëzimeve të mjekëve po i nënshtrohen këtyre "traumave" me participimin e shpenzimeve edhe nga ana e sigurimeve shëndetësore... Unë kam pasë fatin të bëhem dhe nuk e kam përjetuar si traumë... përkundrazi edhe si shenjë pjekurie seksuale... Kam pasur poashtu fatin të jetoj në vende ku ka pasur gjithmonë ujë të mjaftueshëm e jo në "Dropullin e poshtëm", po sa herë kam pasur marrëdhënje nuk kam pasur mundësi edhe të lahem... jam larë përpara...e poashtu jam larë edhe para se të hyjë sonte në forum...

**MisCongeniality** · 29-12-2004, 02:17

Kalto, s'duhet te te isha pergjigj se s'ia vlen, po nejse. Kerkon te dish se ku jane mangesirat e tua ne postin e meposhtem??? Well, ja tek i ke: