Me te drejte analiste Amerikane si Daniel Pipes mendojne CIA dhe FBI nuk duan ti vene emer 'armikut' duke e quajtur ate thjesht 'terrorizem'. Nderkohe qe ai dhe te tjere mendojne se armiku eshte ideologjik: me sakte 'islamizmi' radikal". Ashtu si ideologjite e shkuara si nazizmi, komunizmi kjo ideologji po tenton te fitoje terren duke perfituar nga injoranca e popullateve Islame ne bote.
Jepni mendimin tuaj dhe si mendoni qe keto gjera ndikojne ne Rep. Shqiperise, Kosove, dhe FYROM.
Adresat e faqeve personale mund ti vendosesh ne profil por jo ne firme. Stafi i Forumit
Eshte metode shum efektive kjo.
Njerezit kane me shum frike prej te panjohures, kshuqe ta lesh armikun pa fetyre dhe pa emer e ben popullin te shikoje pas shpine per c'do hap qe ben...s'di nga kush te ruhet, pse te ruhet dhe s'nga se te ruhet.
Kshuqe ndihet konfuz. Kur ndihet konfuz ne mes te konfuzionit kerkon per nje dore te celikte qe e mban qetesine dhe ka nje plan gati per te mbrojtur popullaten dhe te shkaterroje armikun e panjohur qe me forcat kolosale qe ka mund ta shfarose komplet boten per 2 sekonda.
Dhe kush esht kjo dore e celikte? Presidenti. The man with a plan. I vetmi trim qe ka aq guxim sa te perballoje kto justifikime monstruoze per qenje njerezore qe quhen terrorista.
Kshuqe popullata meqe fshihet pas presidentit, shpina e tij ja pengon shikimin perpara. Sa tenton kush te nxjerri pak koken....BOO....shif prapa...terroristi!
Ryder, e ke anashkaluar pyetjen e qafirit. Do jete vone andej si duket :P
War of Ideology
By DAVID BROOKS
Published: July 24, 2004
When foreign policy wonks go to bed, they dream of being X. They dream of writing the all-encompassing, epoch-defining essay, the way George F. Kennan did during the cold war under the pseudonym X.
Careers have been spent racing to be X. But in our own time, the 9/11 commission has come closer than anybody else. After spending 360 pages describing a widespread intelligence failure, the commissioners step back in their report and redefine the nature of our predicament.
We're not in the middle of a war on terror, they note. We're not facing an axis of evil. Instead, we are in the midst of an ideological conflict.
We are facing, the report notes, a loose confederation of people who believe in a perverted stream of Islam that stretches from Ibn Taimaya to Sayyid Qutb. Terrorism is just the means they use to win converts to their cause.
It seems like a small distinction - emphasizing ideology instead of terror - but it makes all the difference, because if you don't define your problem correctly, you can't contemplate a strategy for victory.
When you see that our enemies are primarily an intellectual movement, not a terrorist army, you see why they are in no hurry. With their extensive indoctrination infrastructure of madrassas and mosques, they're still building strength, laying the groundwork for decades of struggle. Their time horizon can be totally different from our own.
As an ideological movement rather than a national or military one, they can play by different rules. There is no territory they must protect. They never have to win a battle but can instead profit in the realm of public opinion from the glorious martyrdom entailed in their defeats. We think the struggle is fought on the ground, but they know the struggle is really fought on satellite TV, and they are far more sophisticated than we are in using it.
The 9/11 commission report argues that we have to fight this war on two fronts. We have to use intelligence, military, financial and diplomatic capacities to fight Al Qaeda. That's where most of the media attention is focused. But the bigger fight is with a hostile belief system that can't be reasoned with but can only be "destroyed or utterly isolated."
The commissioners don't say it, but the implication is clear. We've had an investigation into our intelligence failures; we now need a commission to analyze our intellectual failures. Simply put, the unapologetic defenders of America often lack the expertise they need. And scholars who really know the Islamic world are often blind to its pathologies. They are so obsessed with the sins of the West, they are incapable of grappling with threats to the West.
We also need to mount our own ideological counteroffensive. The commissioners recommend that the U.S. should be much more critical of autocratic regimes, even friendly ones, simply to demonstrate our principles. They suggest we set up a fund to build secondary schools across Muslim states, and admit many more students into our own. If you are a philanthropist, here is how you can contribute: We need to set up the sort of intellectual mobilization we had during the cold war, with modern equivalents of the Congress for Cultural Freedom, to give an international platform to modernist Muslims and to introduce them to Western intellectuals.
Most of all, we need to see that the landscape of reality is altered. In the past, we've fought ideological movements that took control of states. Our foreign policy apparatus is geared toward relations with states: negotiating with states, confronting states. Now we are faced with a belief system that is inimical to the state system, and aims at theological rule and the restoration of the caliphate. We'll need a new set of institutions to grapple with this reality, and a new training method to understand people who are uninterested in national self-interest, traditionally defined.
Last week I met with a leading military officer stationed in Afghanistan and Iraq, whose observations dovetailed remarkably with the 9/11 commissioners. He said the experience of the last few years is misleading; only 10 percent of our efforts from now on will be military. The rest will be ideological. He observed that we are in the fight against Islamic extremism now where we were in the fight against communism in 1880.
We've got a long struggle ahead, but at least we're beginning to understand it.
Se kam anashkalu jo...desha qellimisht me fol per kornizen pa u marr me pikturen. Se fillon i kasaphane ngjyrash aty pastaj qe se merr vesh i verdhi te kuqin...dhe perzierja gjithmon del gri.
Hajt tung
Interesante kjo. Spekullimi i Ryder bon vaki edhe qendron sidoqofte eshte nje problem qe ka ekzistuar qe para 9/11.Postuar mė parė nga D&G Feminine
Problemi me interesant qe shtrohet eshte ky:
Si mund te 'shkaterrohet' ose 'izolohet' kjo ideologji nga e cila kercenohet me teper Europa sesa Amerika, kur shkollaret e Islamit ne Perendim fokusohen tek 'fajet e imperializmit' Europian dhe jo tek situata e sotme.
Sapo ka dale nje studim i UNDP ku thuhet se shkaku i te keqijave te botes Arabe nuk eshte Perendimi por sistemi i tyre arsimor qe i le ata si te dambllamosur, te kuranosur dhe pre e hajvaneve si Ayman al Zawahiri.
Adresat e faqeve personale mund ti vendosesh ne profil por jo ne firme. Stafi i Forumit
Kurse mua me duket interesante gadishmeria e njerezve per te dale me teori konspiracioni perpara se te kuptojne problemin ne brendesine e vete. Po ju bej disa pyetje, pasi te besh pyetjet e duhura, eshte 1/2 e rruges per zbulimin e misterit.
Kush u be shkak per fillimin e luftes kunder terrorizmit?
A lindi ky terrorizem ne 11 shtator apo vite me perpara?
Kush po e perdor fene si mjet rekrutimi ne kete lufte?
A perben terrorizmi vetem nje kercenim per Perendimin apo perben kercenim serioz edhe per Islamin qe e besojne 1 miliard njerez?
A mundet bota perendimore te cliroje Islamin nga ekstremistet islamike?
Kujt i takon te cliroje Islamin nga ata qe perpiqen ta rrembejne ate per qellimet e veta?
A mendoni se terrorizmi islamik e ka emrin Osama Bin Laden?
A mendoni se terrorizmi islamik do te marri fund me eleminimin e Bin Laden?
Cili mendoni se eshte burimi i terrorizmit islamik?
Cili mendoni eshte objektivi i terrorizmit islamik?
Cili mendoni se jane viktimat e terrrorizmit islamik?
Si mund te shkulen rrenjet e terrorizmit islamik?
Kur tu pergjigjeni ketyre pyetjeve, nuk keni perse te lexoni libra apo artikuj neper gazeta per te njohur te verteten.
Albo
"Babai i shtetit ėshtė Ismail "Qemali", e zbuloi Edvin shkencėtari!"
Terrorizmi lindi me cifutet, ska ndonje dyshim ketu, ata fillun te paret, megjithate dikush mund te thote, e kan me hak ta vejne boten perposhte duam sduam ne, mbas 2000 vjet poshterimesh dhe orvatjesh ne cdo cep te botes...
"The true history of mankind will be written only when Albanians participate in it's writing." -ML
Librat lexohen qe marresh nje vendim te informuar...gazetat pastaj jane tjeter gje.
Por le te mos gaboje kush e te mendoje se nuk ka ideologji pas federates te Al-Kaides dhe kercenim me te madh nga terrorizmi Islamik ka Europa me teper se Amerika sepse eshte me afer dhe muslimanet atje nuk kane arritur te 'integrohen'.
Ne mars isha ne France dhe e pashe vete getoizimin e tyre
Cyclotomic ka te drejte ku thote se Cifutet ishin te paret ata qe filluan taktiken terroriste qysh ne vitet 30te kunder Autoriteteve Britanike te Palestines [bombe qe shkaterroi nje hotel ne Jeruzalem]. Kuptohet terrorizmi i tyre, si ai Islamik, ishte thjesht nje MJET i perdorur ne dobi te ideologjise te tyre Sioniste. Ndersa sulmet vetevrasese ishin 'shpikje' e Tamil Tigers ne Sri Lanka ne vitet 60te ne luften e tyre idologjike[per shtet etnik] kunder Sinhalezeve ne fuqi. Pra qe i ashtuquajtur terrorizem te pushoje duhet qe te arrihet qellimi i atyre qe i intereson. Ne rastin Islamik qellimi arrihet me rilindjen e Kalifatit Islamik 80 e kusur vjet pas renies te Kalifatit te fundit...pjese e te cilit ishin dhe territoret Shqiptare (Perandoria Osmane ishte Kalifat).
Pra ky muhabet do vazhdoje deri ne ringjalljen e Kalifatit Islamik Arabik. A eshte gje e mire kjo?
Adresat e faqeve personale mund ti vendosesh ne profil por jo ne firme. Stafi i Forumit
Mendimet tuaja mbi kete paragraf?
Adresat e faqeve personale mund ti vendosesh ne profil por jo ne firme. Stafi i Forumit
Pershendetje te gjitheve.
Une mendoj qe nuk eshte edhe kaq i panjohur terrorizmi,si duan ta klasifikojne mediat ose ne vete.
I kemi pare veprat e tyre dhe fatkeqesisht do shohim akoma ne te ardhmen.
Terrorizmi nuk fillon me ēifutet e nuk mbaron me ta.
Eshte perdorur perhre ne shekuj per te goditur masat qe kane nevoje per nje perbindesh kunder te cilit duhet te ruhen ose ta luftojne.
Po kurre si ne kete moment eshte arma e atyre qe nuk duan paqen e bashkejetesen midis popujve.Anarkia mbi gjithēka.
Po per ju, njerez qe presin kokat ose qe hidhen ne ere ne emer te dikujt nuk jane terroriste po heronj,atehere duhet te rishikoni etiken tuaj morale.
Terrorizmi eshte kunder fese islame edhe pse don te marri me force rolin e shpetimtarit.
Miliona persona ndeshen perdite me difidencen dhe perbuzje per shkak te tyre.
Por ketu nuk flasim per lufte,kjo eshte masaker kunder te pafajshmeve.
Lufta nuk sjell asgje te mire,po ne historin e njerezise ka caktuar gjerarkite dhe te fortin.
Kush pret kokat ne emer te Allahut e te myslimaneve ne te gjithe boten eshte vetem i semure,ndjek ideale te semura,eshte terrorist dhe si i tille duhet te luftohet.
Bashkejetesa dhe hapja e popujve,mentalitetet e reja,dituria do jene arma me e mire per luften kunder kesaj semundje.
Po per bashkejetese nuk do te thote te perulesh,mjafton te respektosh fene dhe idete e ēdo pjesetari te shoqerise.
Por respekt reciprok e jo pretendime.
Diskutim te mbare
leci
Quod timor cladis.
Sed intuitum amet elit vitae est
Regullat e Postimit
Krijoni Kontakt