Wesley Clark për President të SHBA-ve

[AsgjëSikurDielli]

Une jam ne nje nga tri qytetet me te medha ne Amerike, dhe gjenden ne qender, ne downtown. Perdite shoh shume gjera, madje edhe vete me kane pyetur se cfare feje kisha (pavaresisht se nuk kam mjekerr dhe veshem si cdo tjeter) kur me ndalen per shpejtesi te tepruar ne ngasje. Eshte state police kuptohet, por dhe ata bazohen diku.

Ka te ngjaje qe, OJ ishte shume me heret se keto ngjarje dhe ishte NJE. Gjykata Supreme e Shteteve te Bashkuara per nje periudhe te gjate pezulloi denimin me vdekje per shkak te diskriminit. S'ka te beje me periudhen Bush-iane, po tregohet po ashtu se shumica e denimeve me vdekje vinin nga Red territory, apo perndryshe mbeshtetesit e Republikaneve.

Ekonomia ka dy faktore kryesore te renies: shperthimi i te ashtuquajtur Bubble, apo rritjes se cmimeve te burses, dhe lufterat e pakryera dhe ngecja e reformave. Bubble vertete qe shpertheu ne 2000, por gjate periudhes 1992-2000 Amerika perjetoi kohen me te sukseshme ekonomike te saj. Jo qe nuk kishte deficit, po Clinton i la administrates Bush edhe SUFICIT ne arken e shtetit. Politika fiskale e Clinton ishte ajo qe ndihmoi shtetin, ulja e taksave per njeriun e zakonshem, ulja e taksave pper bizneset e vogla dhe te mesme dhe investime e shtetit DIREKT ne ekonomine amerikane, riparimi i udheve, urave, aeroporteve, etj etj.

Republikanet tradicionalisht njifen si parti qe favorizon te medhenjte: kompanite qe edhe japin para per campaign. Tani ato po shperblehen me kete Tax Cut prej diku 500 Miliarde dollare, dhe me tendere arbitrar dhe pa asnje precedent ne Irak. Ne Amerike nuk kishte treg per 'dhurata' ndaj kompanive financuese, duhej krijuar tregu diku tjeter. Dhe meqe edhe Iraku ishte rrezik per Izraelin dhe kriminelin Sharon, keshtu Amerika i vret dy zogj me nje gur. Bushi, nejse.

Histeria eshte e vetekuptueshme, ne kushte te tilla si ai i 11 Shtatorit. Por vazhdimi i atij diskriminimi, tentativat qe mes 'Homeland Security' te ngrihet nje Gestapo Modern, mbajtja e njerezve ne burg pa akuza forumale (kunder ligjit, qe thote se po u mbaj nje njeri me gjate se 6 muaj ne burg pa akuze, ai eshte i lire), injorimi i politikes se jashtme, humbja e aleateve te medhenj, madje edhe aleateve si Meksika, eshte nje deshtim total i Bushit dhe Republikaneve ne pergjithesi.

Suficiti i Social Security Tax po perdoret qe te financohet lufta, e nje person disabled kur aplikon per ndihme, refuzohet. 44.3 milione njerez jane pa sigurim medikal, edhe pse ka kohe qe Bush kishte premtuar nje zgjidhje. Ai nuk mundet nga 44 ti beje 0, po ne kohen kur morri zyren kishte 41 milione te tille, tani jane 44.

Te mos flasim per papunesine, qe po arrin rekordet. Qe nga koha kur ai morri zyren, 3 milione njerez humben punen, dhe nuk po shoh se ka ndonje shenje permiresimi pavaresisht se ka nje vite gjysme qe republikanet propagojne kete.

Duhet kerkuar nje alternative, e ne Amerike dihet se o do jete republikan o demokrat. Une them Clark, mirepo, jo te gjithe mund te pajtohen. Te presim votimet pra, ose se pari nominimin e pastaj votimet te shofim se cfare thote populli.

[Enri]

Albo,

Arnoldi yt, eshte ai qe ka deklaruar qe heroi i tij me i madh eshte Adolph Hitler.
Dhe dicka tjeter, S'ke perse vazhdimisht te hedhesh ne skene argumentin tend bosh qe "jetoj ne Greqi" , prandaj i kam keto mendime. Ketu ke dhe shume te rinj qe jetojne ne vende te tjera, de shumica e tyre mendon si une.

[Gege Toska]

Ngadale bre "patriota" interneti se na mbushet mendjen!Une as nuk thashe eshte i mire dhe as nuk thashe se eshte i keq Wesli Klark,fotoja eshte botuar ne nje gazete amerikane dhe eshte hesapi i tyre!"Pa koment" -jam shprehur ne fillim e ju kercyet perpjete!Me te arsyeshem here tjera!Tash per kenaqesine tuaj po iu sjell artikullin qe e shoqeron ate foto!Eshte shkrim i tjeter kujt dhe nuk shpreh patjeter edhe pikepamjet e mia!Ngadale cjapi...te kasapi!

[Gege Toska]

RALPH PETERS
DEMS' MORAL COLAPSE WOULD any sane American have claimed, in the autumn of 1945, that the United States had been wrong to depose Hitler? Even in the autumn of 2003, would any Democratic presidential aspirant suggest that our war against Hitler was a mistake?
Of Course not. Hitler launched bloody wars of aggression, committed genocide, created a savage police state, and tortured and lolled his own countrymen. He was responsible for the deaths of millions.
Sounds like Saddam to me.
Yet the Democratic Party's uncrowned kings, from Howard the Unready to Wes the Unsteady, insist that Operation Iraqi Freedom was unjustified, whining that Saddam never attacked the United States directly and showed no inclination to do so. According to the Dems, the Bush administration had no moral or legal right to go to war against the Saddam regime, no matter its crimes.
Tell it to FDR. Far from assaulting U.S. interests, Hitler's regime took pains to continue to do business with America for as long as possible. The Japanese, not the Germans, attacked us at Pearl Harbor_ Berlin's declaration of war in support of Tokyo was, at best, reluctant.
Yet FDR had the vision and courage to support the anti-Hitler forces of freedom years before America joined the war. Violating international law. Uncle Sam armed Britain long before we took our rightful place at John Bull's side. When war came, FDR gave the fight against
Germany priority over the war in the Pacific. And FDR was right.
We conveniently forget that many Americans believed there was no justification for going to war with anybody, no matter, how evil, prior to Dec. 7, 1941. It was none of our business. Hitler was only righting the injustice of Versailles...
"But wait!" Clark's cappuccino commandos and the Deanie-weenies cry, "Even if Saddam did nasty things, we had no right to go to war without the approval of the international community!"
Faculty-lounge nonsense. American policy can't depend on Belgium's blessing and the approval of Belarus. Do Dean and dark really think Syria and Sudan are ever going to vote with us at the United Nations to Overthrow a tyrant or to en-force respect for human rights?
Gen. Clark is especially elusive here. He insists (except when he doesn't) that going to war against Saddam was wrong because it defied the will of his beloved international community and broke with "accepted" laws on sovereignty.
Yet Gen. Clark (and the Democratic Party) was all for going to war to protect the people of Kosovo from Milosevic, even though far fewer Kosovars had been killed by the Serbs than Iraqis were slaughtered by Saddam. And Milosevic, though a vile creature, never attacked neighboring states beyond the boundaries of the former Yugoslavia.
Slobo was a sissy compared to Saddam So why was Belgrade a legitimate target, while Baghdad was off-limits? Because NATO's bureaucrats in uniform said so?
Certainly, it was right to protect the people of Kosovo. But why was that a jus war, while Operation Iraqi Freedom was in Gen. Clark's view. a mistake? Becaust his morally perfect European friend; were sick of refugees from the Balkans?
Did the Democrats only support the campaign in Kosovo because it was Clinton's political property? Must they reject the elimination of Saddam's monstrous regime solely because the initiative be-longed to President Bush?
Was Gen. Clark so determined to "get" Milosevic because he harbored the sort of personal grudge the Democrats ascribe to the Bush family in relation to Saddam?
Or are the Dems simply racists when it comes to wars of liberation? Was intervention in the Balkans necessary because the victims were white?
Were the lives of half a million Iraqi citizens slaughtered in cold blood by Sad-dam's regime, as well as the lives of the 1.5 million to 2 million Iraqis, Iranians and Kuwaitis who died in Saddam's wars of aggression, simply not as valuable as the lives of a few thousand Europeans ?
Do Democrats secretly place a higher value on the life of a Bosnian than on that of an Iraqi Shi'a? Does Gen. Clark assign greater worth to the lives of Kosovars than to the lives of Kurds? Why don't Democrats ever mention the mass graves in Iraq? Or the relief the overwhelming majority of Iraqis feel at living to see the end of the Ba'athist regime?
Yes, there's a difference between de-posing Hitler and getting rid of Saddam: The people of Iraq welcomed liberation, while the Germans resented it.
If the Democrats are unaware of their inconsistencies on such issues, then they are dangerously naive and irresponsible. If they're simply ignoring the truth for political ends, then they are immoral. In neither case should they be entrusted with America's foreign policy.
Democrats' rhetoric about Iraq is one big lie of omission. Taking Bush to task for our failure to uncover stockpiles of WMD, they conveniently forget that Sad-dam's regime, like Hitler's, was itself a huge weapon of mass destruction. Per-haps I'm not as intellectually sophisticated as Dean or Clark, but I don't see the difference between gassed Jews and gassed Kurds.
Or is freedom only for white folks, privileged blacks and soccer moms?
We tell our children that they should have the courage to do what's right, even if it alienates their classmates. Should we demand less of our government? Should Washington turn a blind eye to massacre and oppression for the sake of remaining a member of the international in-crowd? Or should we have the courage to stand alone and lead when our cause is just?
Those who argue that deposing Saddam was wrong are the equivalent of apologists for Hitler. One has increasing difficulty telling the difference between Gov. Dean and Prime Minister Chamberlain, between Gen. Clark and his role model, Marshal Petain.
Ralph Peters is the author of "Beyond Baghdad: Postmodern War and Peace," released this week.

[Brari]

Geg ke thane:
----
Ngadale bre "patriota" interneti se na mbushet mendjen!Une as nuk thashe eshte i mire dhe as nuk thashe se eshte i keq Wesli Klark,
------

Ne se je Shqiptar me mend ne krye nuk kishe arsye me zbulu kte foto sepse vepra e KLARKUT eshte si nje MAL I MADH ne te mire te Shqiptareve..

Ai KLARKU ja hapi rrugen 2,5 milion Shqiptareve te KoSOVES te kthehen pa friken e Shkaut ne shpijat stergjyshore..

Ske turp..

---

[Andrra e Jetes]

Brari ia bej nje bust ne dac Klarkut por e verteta eshte e verete dhe ate nuk mund te fshehin shqiptaret!Shiko pak se cfare thote Lidhja Shqiptare per Klintonin e stafin e tij,ma merr mendja se Dioguardi eshte shqiptar e me kontribut te njohur besopj apo jo!?...Keshtu turpin mbaje per vete meqe e paske per qejf sepse askush nuk duhet te kete turp nga e verteta!

[Gege Toska]

Flm Andrra,une prape e theksoj se kam paraqitur vetem nje shkrim dhe nje foto te publikuar ne shtypin amerikan pa u perfshire ne interpretimin e metejme!Kurse "e-patrioteve" patrioteve elektronike e kompjuterike iu ardhkerka keq,pune e madhe,dielli me shoshe nuk mbulohet!Apo u dashka ta fshehim te verteten si ne kohe te xhaxhit...

[StterollA]

Duhet ta kuptoni qe Klark i perkiste nje Aleance per zgjidhjen e ceshtjes se Kosoves dhe eshte e natyrshme qe ai te kete takime me te dy palet. Sic e sqaroi dhe glaukus, ajo foto daton qe ne kohen kur emri i Mladic ishte akoma i njome ne listen e zeze; dhe sot ajo fotografi shfrytezohet vetem nga rivalet politik te Klarkut per njollosje te personalitetit te tij. Ne si shqiptare nuk na takon t'u japim fryme ketyre thashethemeve, thjesht sepse ja kemi borxh Klarkut.

StterollA

[Jonian]

Andrra:
Ajo liga shqiptare qe permend ti, per mendimin tim eshte nje pacavure dhe jo organizate,e cila ka filluar te perdoret nga Dioguardi per arsye personale. Eshte per te ardhur keq qe organizata te tilla si Liga Qytetare Shqiptaro-Amerikane apo dhe shoqata "VATRA" i kane humbur vlerat qe gezonin dikur per shkak te keq menaxhimit te tyre, dhe kane krijuar pakenaqesi ne komunitet, te cilat kane cuar ne krijimin e organizatave te tjera si NAAC apo AANO. NAAC (Keshilli Kombetar Shqiptaro-Amerikan) eshte organizate jo-fitimprurese, e krijuar kryesisht nga biznesmene shqiptaro-amerikane, e cila sherben si zeri yne prane politikes amerikane, ndersa AANO (Organizata Kombetare Shqiptaro-Amerikane) eshte organizate kulturore e cila merret kryesisht me rigjallerimin e kultures dhe traditave shqiptare ketu ne USA nepermjet organizimit te aktiviteteve te ndryshme si p.sh: Festa e Flamurit, turne basketbolli, mbledhje fondesh per bursa studentesh te cilat ato ofrojne, etj. aktivitete si keto. Per sa kohe kam qene une ne USA, per Ligen Qytetare Shqiptaro-Amerikane nuk kam degjuar asgje (pervec takimit Dioguardi-Berisha), gje qe tregon mire besoj se sa shume kane bere apo jane duke bere ata njerez per ceshtjen shqiptare, keshtu qe mire do bejne te mos shajne poshte e perpjete njerin apo tjetrin politikan. Ne rastin konkret po te mos ishte administrata Klinton, Kosova as nuk do ta shihte ndonjehere lirine e saj, gjithashtu dhe konferencat e Rambujese apo Daytonit nuk do ishin mbajtur si dhe traktati i Ohrit per shqiptaret e Maqedonise nuk do ishte nenshkruar.
Sapo i hodha nje sy faqes se internetit te Liges Shqiptare ( hera e pare). Aty e vura re edhe me teper ate cfare thashe me pare. Cdo gje qe Liga pretendon se e ka bere eshte bere nga Presidenti i saj, Joseph Dioguardi, ose te pakten nen kujdesin e tij. a thua se ai eshte i vetmi anetar i Liges. Po ashtu edhe artikujt apo materialet qe jane shkruar ne faqen e Internetit, shumica syresh jane shkruar nga Shirley Cloyes DioGuardi, pra eshte kthyer ne nje dicka familjare.
Nuk synoj te hedh balte mbi punen e Liges, jam i sigurt qe edhe ata e kane ndihmuar ceshtjen shqiptare, sado pak apo shume, por mendoj se nuk eshte nje organizate e cila duhet marre per shembull. Megjithate ne qofsha i gabuar, koha do ta tregoje.

[Albo]

Surpriza me e kendshme e kesaj fushate presidenciale do te ishte pikerisht nese perballe Bush, demokratet do te vendosnin Clark. Pavaresisht se kush dilte fitimtar nga ato zgjedhje, presidenti i ardhshem do te ishte nje republikan.

Clark zgjodhi te hyje ne partine demokratike jo me merite, por se nuk mund te kandidonte si republikan, pasi sic eshte shprehur vete ne media "sepse Karl Rove, keshilltari me i vjeter politik i Bush nuk e ngriti telefonin e tij".

Ashtu si Regan edhe Clark nese fiton ne ato zgjedhje, do te perdorte te njejten pergjigje historike te Regan:

Nuk jam une qe e lashe partine demokrate, ishte partia demokrate qe me la mua.

Paniku qe ka mberthyer demokratet nga suksesi dhe zelli i Bush per te kryer reforma rrenjesore, i ka bere aq te deshperuar sa jane gati te zgjedhin nje republikan per te kandiduar kunder Bush. Kesaj i thone, "Per inat te sime vjerre, do te fle me Millonane".

Do te jete nje fushate me te vertete shume e kendshme.