Gati për luftë”, NATO 300 mijë forca në përballjen me Rusinë

[Vinjol]

NATO po përgatit për luftë me Rusinë mbi 300 mijë ushtarë. Lajmi bëhet i ditur nga mediat britanike që citojnë përfaqësuesin e përhershëm të Britanisë së Madhe pranë NATO-s, Adam Tomson.

Shkak janë bërë tensionet e larta të kohëve të fundit me Moskën, çka kanë shtuar rrezikun e shpërthimit të një konflikti të armatosur.

Sipas tij, ngritja e kësaj force do të bëhet brenda tre muajsh dhe do të jetë e gatshme për tu dërguar në zonat ku mund të shpërthejë konflikti i mundshëm me ushtrinë ruse, kryesisht në shtetet e Europës Lindore.

Trupat janë grumbulluar nga të 28 vendet anëtare të aleancës veri-atlantike.

Sekretari i Përgjithshëm i NATO-s, Jens Stoltemberg tha për mediat britanike se kohët e fundit është vënë re se Rusia është bërë mjaft aktive në shumë fusha, veçanërisht me propagandën e saj në disa vende europiane anëtare të Aleancës. Ndaj dhe NATO po reagon me përforcimet më të mëdha, që prej luftës së ftohtë.

Pjesë e planit për vënien në gatishmëri për luftë të 300 mijë trupave është edhe dërgimi i 4 mijë ushtarëve në Lituani, Letoni, Poloni e Estoni brenda 2017-ës. Marrëdhëniet mes perëndimit dhe Rusisë janë tensionuar që pas aneksimit të Krimesë nga Rusia dhe konfliktit sirian./ tvklan.al

[arbereshi_niko]

Ne nje interviste te nje gazete lokale Parlamentní listy, gjenerali çek Hynek Blaško ka folur per nje mundesi lufte midis Rusise dhe Natos duke e shpjeguar me nje barsalete.
Gazetaret i rikujtojne gjeneralit qe armatimet e Natos, bashke me ato te shkaterrimit masiv, gjenden gjithmone e me afer kufirit rus.
Nje nga keta pyet nese na duhet te presim te ndodhe se shpejti kjo katastrofe ne rast nje konflikti midis Aleances Atllantike dhe Rusise.
Gjenerali pergjigjet me nje barsalete. Ai thote: “Ne internet qarkullon nje barsalete. Obama dhe gjeneralet e tij debatojne ne Pentagon dhe nuk bien dakort kur eshte me mire te sulmohet Rusia.
Ne fund fare marrin dhe pyesin francezet, qe u pergjigjen; “nuk e dime, por sigurisht jo ne dimer. Do te shkoje e do te kthehet keq fare”.
Me pas kane pyetur gjermanet, qe pergjigjen keshtu; “ nuk e dime. Por sigurisht jo ne vere. E kemi provuar”. E ç’te bejne ? marrin e pyesin kinezet:
Kur duhet sulmuar Rusia? Kinezet u pergjigjen “ne kete moment preçiz! Rusia ka filluar ndertimin e gazdotit ( gaz-sjellesit )”Power of Siberia”, “Turkish Stream”, kozmodromin “Vostochny”,
uren per ne Krimea dhe se shpejti duan te modernizojne rajonet e Lindjes se Larget, atyre u duhet te ndertojne impjante te reja per Boterorin dhe per kampionatin boteror te Atletikes,
ka edhe nje plan per zhvillimin e rajonit arktik… mire pra, tani shpejt ata kane nevoje per nje numer te madh roberish per realizimin e ketyre veprave…!” – tha Blaško
pastaj duke shtuar vepren e humoristit dhe shkrimtarit Jaroslav Hašek “Ushtari i mire Sc'vèik".
Gazetaret me pas e pyeten ne rast te nje “lufte konvencjonale me Rusine”, do te perseriteshin disa nga ngjarjet e Luftes se Pare Boterore: “shume dezertore, krijimi i shume legjoneve, etj.”
“Une dhe kapo i distrektit kemi thene gjithmone: patriotizmi, ndjenja e detyres dhe shpirti i sakrifices, keto jane arme te verteta ne lufte!.


Ps: Rusia eshte e vetmja qe nuk do lufte, ndersa vendet e Natos duhet te harxhojne shuma te majme per te fryre barqet ne Washinton.
Pershendetje

[jarigas]

Sa budallalleqe.....Nato nuk egziston me si nje trup i vetem...Turqia eshte lavire e vjeter..Franca po ashtu...Britania eshte e lidhur me SHBA..SHBA jane te pafuqishem qekur kryemyftiu Husein Obama e çarmatosi..Italia s'ka fuqi as te ndaloje lunderzat e ISIS.it.....Trump do ti jape te shtymen ketij organizmi pa koke e pa krye....prandaj, llogje koti!!

[mesia4ever]

Kur duhet sulmuar Rusia? Kinezet u pergjigjen “ne kete moment preçiz! Rusia ka filluar ndertimin e gazdotit ( gaz-sjellesit )”Power of Siberia”, “Turkish Stream”, kozmodromin “Vostochny”,
uren per ne Krimea dhe se shpejti duan te modernizojne rajonet e Lindjes se Larget, atyre u duhet te ndertojne impjante te reja per Boterorin dhe per kampionatin boteror te Atletikes,
ka edhe nje plan per zhvillimin e rajonit arktik… mire pra, tani shpejt ata kane nevoje per nje numer te madh roberish per realizimin e ketyre veprave…!” – tha Blaško
pastaj duke shtuar vepren e humoristit dhe shkrimtarit Jaroslav Hašek “Ushtari i mire Sc'vèik".
Gazetaret me pas e pyeten ne rast te nje “lufte konvencjonale me Rusine”, do te perseriteshin disa nga ngjarjet e Luftes se Pare Boterore: “shume dezertore, krijimi i shume legjoneve, etj.”
“Une dhe kapo i distrektit kemi thene gjithmone: patriotizmi, ndjenja e detyres dhe shpirti i sakrifices, keto jane arme te verteta ne lufte!.

Ne nje situate hipotetike ku Rusia hyn ne lufte me ShBA-te dhe perdoren armet berthamore Rusia e peson me shume. ShBA-te mund te bejne shume here me shume deme ne territorin rus sesa qe ushtria ruse do te mund te bente ne ShBA. ShBA ka sistemin anti raketor me te avancuarin sot ne bote dhe asnje shtet tjeter nuk e ka. Poashtu ka sistemin me te mire ushtarak ne gjurmimin e nendeteseve.
Lufte konvencionale me Rusine nuk mund te kete pervec nese Rusia lufton me taktiken e luftes qe eshte duke e zhvilluar kunder Ukraines. Por kjo taktike nuk do t'i funksiononte kunder nje anetari te NATO-s sepse do ta humbte brenda nates.

[HFTengineer]

Ne nje situate hipotetike ku Rusia hyn ne lufte me ShBA-te dhe perdoren armet berthamore Rusia e peson me shume. ShBA-te mund te bejne shume here me shume deme ne territorin rus sesa qe ushtria ruse do te mund te bente ne ShBA. ShBA ka sistemin anti raketor me te avancuarin sot ne bote dhe asnje shtet tjeter nuk e ka. Poashtu ka sistemin me te mire ushtarak ne gjurmimin e nendeteseve.
Lufte konvencionale me Rusine nuk mund te kete pervec nese Rusia lufton me taktiken e luftes qe eshte duke e zhvilluar kunder Ukraines. Por kjo taktike nuk do t'i funksiononte kunder nje anetari te NATO-s sepse do ta humbte brenda nates.

Ti plako jo vbetem ske haberin eknomik po edhe gjeopolitik lexon ca artikuj propgandiste neoconservative ku amerika eshte hero dhe bota nuk ka investuar ne fushen ushtarake . Nuk eshte bota e luftes se dytete botre, duhet te cohesh nga gjumi, bota sot eshte globaliste pra ekonomite jane te lidhura dhe ekonomi te lidhura jo vetem me kinen dhe boten dhe anasjeltas. Nje lufte me rusine do e conte evropen per lesh e para dhe amerikenne nje livel te pa pare. Nqs nuk e ke haberin amerika akoma nuk e ma marre veten ekonomikisht dhe ka mundsi dhe shumne eknomiste flasin per krize tjeter financjare. E dyta eshte problemi qe i hap rrug kines per lufte sepse thyen shume marvesheje dhe spese cenimeve do i behen . Kina ehste dhe armik i Rusise prsh ne disa pika ekonomike si dhe ortak ne pika gjeografike/politike. Jane pjes E BRICS. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BRICS
Amerika eshte ortak eknomik me kinen por gjegrafikisht dhe ushtarakisht armik. Pra po te futet kina ne ekuacjon punet do ikin per lesh.

http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the...would-be-17210

E treta duhet lte lexosh pak per rindertimin e rusise dhe sa ka investuar kina ne fushen ushtarake kto 20 vite.


http://freebeacon.com/national-secur...-capabilities/

http://www.e-ir.info/2016/06/25/new-...ato-responses/


Sa per bombat berthamore e di pse u qujat lufte e ftohte ca do kish nodhur nqs ishte luft direkt?


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual...ed_destruction

Fut dhe faktin qe rusia e ka rrit numrin dhe te investuar ne teknollogjin berthamore .


http://time.com/4280169/russia-nuclear-security-summit/


http://freebeacon.com/national-secur...uclear-treaty/


http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...s-back-on.html


Kshque boll fole gomarrliqe dhe sidomos kur nuk jeton ne amerike dhe sprekesh po te filloj nje lufte drejt per drjet dhe nuk e ke haberin e implikimeve.

[mesia4ever]

Edhe ti nuk dallon nga disa myslimane, ateiste e ortodokse, argumentin kryesor e ke ofendimin e njerezve.
Sistemi oligarkik ka ardhur me Putinin por edhe Jelcini ishte nje m.., mbronte Milloshevicin edhe pse ushtria e tij vriste gra e femije gjate luftes ne Kosove, Rusia ishte dhe eshte totalisht e korruptuar pa kurrfare morali njerezor. Putini ka kapur pushtetin dhe deri ne vdekje nuk e leshon karriken, kjo per ty eshte gje e mire. Ku ki pa 1 njeri me qen president per 40 vite deri ne vdekje perpos ne vendet diktatoriale. Tani mbeshtet nje rregjim qe bombardon spitalet me te semure bile edhe vet i bombardon. Kush e lavderon kete, perpos nje budalla, e ti je i tille, budallalleku nuk eshte monopol vetem i myslimaneve por zgjerohet dita dites ne tipa si ti.

[arbereshi_niko]

Edhe ti nuk dallon nga disa myslimane, ateiste e ortodokse, argumentin kryesor e ke ofendimin e njerezve.
Sistemi oligarkik ka ardhur me Putinin ...... Putini ka kapur pushtetin dhe deri ne vdekje nuk e leshon karriken...
Ku ki pa 1 njeri me qen president per 40 vite deri ne vdekje perpos ne vendet diktatoriale.

Gjithesesi nuk me je drejtuar mua, une me pare se te pergjigjem do te uroj "mire se ardhjen" , gjithashtu "ngushellime" per Clinton-nen... :-)
Ti shume e deshiroje te vinte ne pushtet ajo qe do te provonte forcen me Putin...
Por ja qe amerikanet e kuptuan qe nuk eshte armiku i tyre Vladimir Putin, por izis dhe daesh apo al-nusra qe ti
( mos te rriten veshet pasi me "TI" dmth ata si ti... ) dhe Clinton i quani " opozite e moderuar ".
Ja pra nga vjen edhe diskutimi i shtrembur qe ke per Putin, jo pse Kosova keshtu e bombat ne Alepo ashtu, jo Ukraina apo Krimea,
jo Putin diktator qe ka uzurpuar "kolltukun" e presidentit per 40 vjet , jo terci e verci...............
Angela Merkel nga data 22 nentor 2005 deri me sot eshte ne menyre te vazhdueshme kopo e padiskutueshme e Gjermanise...
Pse nuk e akuzon ti qe njeh politiken dhe etiketon te tjeret si diktatore? pastaj ajo dje hodhi edhe nje here kandidaturen per te katerten here konsekutive ne krye te Gjermanise,
po as’kujt nuk i vajti ne mend ta akuzoje si diktatore!
Putin ka hipur ne fuqi me 31 dhjetor te 1999 pra vetem 12 ore perpara vitit 2000 e kjo vazhdoi per dy mandate 7 maj 2008, pasi nuk lejohet ne Rusi me shume,
keshtu ne daten 7 maj te 2012 ai u rizgjodh perseri si president deri me sot, gezon mbi 89% te elektoratit rus dhe nuk i behet vone kujt se ç’flasim neve ne forumin shqiptar…,
pasi tifozllekun tone ketu nuk e konsideron njeri.
Pra po te vihej ne diskutim ky uzurpim i postit presidencjal, Putin nuk eshte as me pak e as me shume
“uzurpues” se sa koleget e tjere ne Evrope. Pasi flitet per pak me shume se 11 vjet si per Putin ashtu edhe per Merkel,
ku kjo e fundit me te drejte kerkon te katertin mandat si kanceljere, pse jo?
Por Putin eshte per ty diktator, kriminel, misherimi i te keqes, armiku i njerezimit, edhe nofka nga me te ndryshmet,
por i nderuar mesia4ever, ai ben interesat e vendit te tij, ta kishim neve nje si ky Putin.
Putin mund ta akuzosh per ç’fare te duash ti e une bashke, por qe po ta kishim edhe neve nje “putin”
gjerat do te shkonin me mire per gjithe kombin tone… , ta garantoj ! Shqiptaret do te kishin me shume peshe ne Rrajon!
Ate e kane zgjedhur mbi 80 % e popullit rus, ku sondazhet luhaten sipas rrethanave historike, momentet e ndryshme qe jetojme, lufta ne Lindjen e Mesme dhe ajo civile ne Ukrahine,
ose Krimea (sot Rusi )ku 97 % e popullsise votoi per bashkim me Rusine dhe ku 98% per Putin.
Tani edhe Clinton-ja ( ajo e preferuara jote ) e urrente bash si ti, kete Vladimir Vladimiroviç-in …
por ja qe kohet ndryshojne dhe ku i dihet ndoshta edhe ti me kohen…, do te ndryshosh.
Sidoqofte nuk pi fare uje se si e mendon, por mos ler nam duke folur per çart kunder…, pasi Putin nuk te degjon…!
Ja kalofsh mire dhe mos e merr si personale, pasi diskutohet pikerisht se kemi ide te ndryshme dhe te kunderta, por pa hiperbolizuar dhe deformuar gjerat.
Pershendetje

[HFTengineer]

Let ti marrim cdo gje qe the :

Edhe ti nuk dallon nga disa myslimane, ateiste e ortodokse, argumentin kryesor e ke ofendimin e njerezve.
.

Une te kam partqit fakte mbas faketve .
Cfare mund ti thuash ne njeriu qe i anashkalon dhe nuk lexon cdo fakt, vadshon te riperserise te njejtin thenje por duke perseritur pa prova per te munduar ta bej te vertete, dhe nuk sjell asnje kunder fakt qer ti mohoj apo provoj dicka pervec nje injorantiu qe vashdon te flas pa fakte dhe te bej ekspertin kur se ka haberin ?


Pastaj jame une qe bej smire kundrejt ortodoxve, musilimane ateiste etj etj?
Apo kjo squhet.


E di ca eshte cerry picking?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherry_picking


Argument nga repeticjoni?
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/...-by-Repetition

[HFTengineer]

Putini ka kapur pushtetin dhe deri ne vdekje nuk e leshon karriken, kjo per ty eshte gje e mire. Ku ki pa 1 njeri me qen president per 40 vite deri ne vdekje perpos ne vendet diktatoriale. .

Ja te shofim me fakte mqense na ke sjell shum fakte per te vertetuar cthe sa shume leke kan investuar kta ne amerike per ta hudh

Kjo ehste e shekputur nga isreal shamir si ***** riot u mundiua te hidhte putinin qe qe e paguar qe nga kta ktej:



Anti-Putin protests took place during and directly after the presidential campaign. The most notorious protest was the ***** Riot performance on 21 February, and subsequent trial.[111] An estimated 8,000–20,000 protesters gathered in Moscow on 6 May,[112][113] when eighty people were injured in confrontations with police,[114] and 450 were arrested, with another 120 arrests taking place the following day.[115] A counter-protest of Putin supporters occurred which culminated into a gathering of an estimated 130,000 supporters at the Luzhniki Stadium, Russia's largest stadium. Some of the attendees stated that they had been paid to come, were forced to come by their employers, or were misled into believing that they were going to attend a folk festival instead.[116][117][118][119][120] T


http://www.israelshamir.net/English/...iot-London.htm



I received a letter from the Arts Editor of the Morning Star asking for my permission to re-publish my popular essay on the ***** Riot:

Dear Mr Shamir

I'm the arts editor of the Morning Star newspaper (see
www.morningstaronline.co.uk) and we'd like to reprint an edited version of
your ***** Riot article.
Would you please grant permission? Unfortunately, we run on a shoestring so
we're unable to pay a fee but I hope you will agree as it will bring your
challenging piece to a wider readership.
I'd be grateful for a swift response as we have a possible slot free in next
Saturday's publication.

With very best wishes

Clifford Cocker
Arts editor
Morning Star newspaper


I gave my permission immediately, and they published it – and took it down in a few hours under pressure of the Jewish Lobby.

The Lobby had a good reason to object. In this article, I wrote:

“For much milder anti-Jewish hate talk, European countries customarily sentence offenders to two-to-five years of prison for the first offence. The Russians applied hate crime laws to offenders against Christian faith, and this is probably a Russian novelty. The Russians proved that they care for Christ as much as the French care for Auschwitz, and this shocked the Europeans who apparently thought ‘hate laws’ may be applied only to protect Jews and gays. The Western governments call for more freedom for the anti-Christian Russians, while denying it for holocaust revisionists in their midst.”

Actually, the Jewish angle to the PR affair is more than that: though I did not find it necessary to mention in my article, the most outspoken PR supporters and enemies of the Church in Russia, such as Viktor Shenderovich, Igor Eidman, Marat Gelman, Xenia Sobchak, Alexey Venediktov happen to be of Jewish origin. None of them is a practicing Jew, but they apparently inherited their hatred to the Church from their forefathers.

Surely, there are many non-Jews who hate the Church, and there are many descendants of Jews who came to Christ and are saved, but still the correlation can’t be denied. The British Jewish ‘tribal or kosher’ Marxists provide their support, for, in words of Gilad Atzmon, “Jewish Marxism is very different from Marxism or socialism in general. While Marxism is a universal paradigm, Jewish Marxism is basically a crude utilisation of ‘Marxist-like’ terminology for the Jewish tribal cause.” Indeed they were on the watch; they applied pressure to the Morning Star, and the British Communists surrendered immediately.

They did not care that the attacks proceeded from Harry’s Place, the dirtiest Zionist leftist blog in Britain, viciously anti-Muslim, positioned against Iran and Syria, violently anti-Russian, and surely anti-Shamir. Harry’s Place described me as “antisemite/Holocaust denier/Assange collaborator/Lukashenko enabler/all-around slimeball Israel Shamir”. I think of using it as my signature in future J.

They apologised to the readers in the following language:

A NUMBER of you have raised concerns over the decision to reprint an article by Israel Shamir on the Russian band ***** Riot that appeared in the weekend’s Morning Star.
The paper would like to reassure readers that the piece was syndicated from Counterpunch in good faith without knowledge of the author’s background.
We would like to reiterate the paper’s commitment to publishing writers who reflect and remain steadfastly committed to the values of anti-racism, anti-fascism, international solidarity and social justice that the paper has campaigned for ever since its establishment.
It remains guided by those goals and will seek in future, wherever possible, to establish the full biography of writers before publishing their work.
In the meantime the Morning Star would like to distance itself from the opinions of the author of the piece, which do not reflect our position or those of the wider movement.
We apologise wholeheartedly for any distress caused.

So many code-words to mask their weak knees. If they can’t stand up to a few Jewish Marxists, how can they stand up to real big capitalist enemies?

But I do not want to end on such a determinist note, condemning the Reds and condemning the Jews. Despite all correlations, people are free to think and to act. We have free will. Some of the strongest voices against the PR outrage were Reds and Jews, or rather Russian leftists of www.left.ru, some of Jewish origin and some not, all strongly anti-Zionist (they even translated and published Israel Shahak). Here are excepts from one of their texts, by Valentin Zorin. It explains well the position of the Russian anti-imperialist Left which should eventually influence the Western anti-imperialist Left and Right.

Pussies Rioting against Independent Russia, by Valentin Zorin (excepts)
“…Not only their name (***** Riot) is in English. They talk as if they translate from English. They use language of an Americanised native who thinks and speaks the colonisers’ language. Russia is definitely not a colony of the Anglo-American Empire, at least it is not a colony yet, but already we have colonised natives in droves, for colonisation is not a single event but a lasting process…
The PR belong to bourgeois radical left adapted for the colonised nations. Their roots are to be found in the early period of the Cold War, when the US decided to use leftist ideology to fight communism. Feminism, beatniks, sexual liberation, even civil rights movement were sponsored by American state agencies and by private interests. They developed gender studies, imported French post-structuralism of Foucault and Derrida, and eventually exported into colonised cultures.
For what reason? Just guess, which soldier would fight better for Russia, one who believes in “God, King and Motherland” or one who thinks that all these ideas (always excepting post-modernism and post-structuralism) are just deliberate illusions created by the authorities? Or make it easier: what would rather wear Russian marines under their battledress in face-to-face combat, a cross or a politically correct and gender-adjusted image?
I know, after asking this question, I’ll be forever banned from entering the Kingdom of the Leftist Heaven. A French maître of post-something would sarcastically smirk, and ultra-conservatives would applaud, to my chagrin. But this question allows to divine the meaning of the PR affair, for the meaning is not in our hands, nor it is in hands of Putin, neither of the Church. The Imperial Masters of Discourse rule what is the meaning, while we can only understand it – or not. All Western newspapers made it clear: “Putin versus PR; Putin persecutes the PR, PR against Putin”. It was repeated by the colonial media in Russia, by practically everybody of importance excepting such dyed-in-the-wool fogies as yours truly.
Who made the PR so successful and famous, who secured their place in history? Putin did. Putin is our alpha and omega. Please do not beat me! It is not my doing, it is them, the Pussies! They did not ask the Virgin to banish private property, dope traders, human traffickers, oligarchs, bankers, police, Sixth fleet or anything else. They asked her to remove a small unseemly guy named Putin from the Kremlin. Even if the Pussies were mistaken, the State Department, Madonna, Mme Clinton and Mme Merkel, the NY Times and the Guardian could not be wrong. They all know that behind Putin there is a force that sets limit to Imperial omnipotence and to the Masters’ monopoly on the meaning of things.
Without Putin, i.e. without independent Russia blocking the road of the Western Empire to full spectrum dominance, nobody would notice the Pussies, or us, or even our biggest oligarchs. It is unpleasant to hear, but we would become a remote province of the Empire, fit for business or pleasure but of no political importance. We would become eating and TV-watching nothingness. A small garrison of imperial troopers would suffice to control us. But despite all Imperial efforts, Putin still sits in the Kremlin.
What is the secret of his political longevity? Cruel repressions? But if so, where are the martyrs? The only possibly political prisoner is the oligarch Khodorkovsky. The second best, Udaltsov, never rated for more than 15 days of detention. So perhaps the secret is – the silent support of masses that do not agree to Nothingness?
There are many reasons to be disgusted by the Church, as she consecrates capitalist violence. But if masses need it as “the heart of heartless world” in order to survive, let it be. It is good. And if masses silently support Putin, because there is no other force able to withstand the assault of the Empire and of Nothingness, let it be. It is good.

And here a letter of an English reader reacting on the Morning Star decision:



From Elisha Traven:

I don't agree with everything you write as I'm not always sure where you are coming from. But writers like you need to be read over a period of time and not continually picked up and criticised. If you don't like what the cook has prepared then don't shout at him. There is no point. Just leave the restaurant and find a place where the food and wine and beer and clientele suit you. Let each writer be himself is my motto. There are some who could do with being shot but where would this all end?

I was amazed to read in today's Morning Star that an article by you which they had published on Saturday was not to their reader's liking. They apologised to their readers and distanced themselves from the views you expressed. Apparently they had lifted the article from Counterpunch and had no idea who you were. Who do they think they're kidding? They are either truly ignorant in regard to you which beggars belief. It is just not a creditable defence. This newspaper is heavily involved in the campaign for Palestinian rights. They would know the names of every single child in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank such is their knowledge of the situation out there.

You know what I mean. I have read extremely detailed news articles published by the Palestinian Solidarity Campaign in their magazine. If I am reading such a magazine then so are they. We get continued reports from Palestine delivered to packed meetings here which are held all over the country. Organised by every tom, dick, and harry socialist party. They know you alright. They couldn't fail to know you because of your strong support for the Palestinians. I'm not sure what is going on at the Morning Star. They don't normally listen to their readers. They preach the gospel according to Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin. You take it as it comes. Delivered to the readers from on high.

I didn't realise you were living in Moscow. I know what you are saying about the Russian press is true since I have read it over a period of time through various sources. Translated or already available in English. Like Moscow Times. They are running an orchestrated campaign against the Russian state. It is not like the so called liberal newspapers in Britain and America. They are connected up to the street protest gangs and were delighted when large numbers of people demonstrated last December and in March. Not only were the people being egged on to cause a breakdown of social order by well known Russian newspapers but radio stations such as Echo Moscow were part of that criminal conspiracy too. I call it a criminal conspiracy because that's what it looks like to me. I found the article you wrote about the PR hooligan girls. The Morning Star has removed Saturday's digital edition of the paper from its site altogether. Even though that breaks the subscription agreement which is that they allow you to read the Morning Star's previous digital editions of the paper. I think this is every edition for the past two weeks or it might even be for a month. I agree with you about PR.
Elijah Traven,
Hull
East Riding of Yorkshire
PS George Galloway of the Respect Party is MP for Bradford West which is in south Yorkshire. He is well known for his strong support of the Palestinian people. I'm sure you know of him. I salute you, Israel Shamir, for your love of Russia and defence of their elected president. You are a true and loyal servant of social democracy and the rule of law.





http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net...nd-*****-riot/

hristmas is a wonderful time at the Paris city centre church of La Madeleine. The magnificent vaulted ceilings echo to the sounds of baroque organ music and the choir rehearsing for the famous Christmas Eve concerts. But mainly it is a haven where generations of devout Catholics sit, pray and re-charge their spiritual batteries.

Then last December 20 it became the scene of an obscenity. A young woman, naked to the waist apart from a blue veil, marched to the altar and proceeded to enact an “abortion” using a calf’s liver as a foetus. Then while screaming pro-abortion slogans she proceeded to urinate on the altar. After striking defiant poses for photographers she walked calmly back out.

Radical feminist street outrage group Femen had struck again and were duly rewarded with a flood of fawning international TV, print and online coverage. Six years after they were launched in Kiev, Femen have become the one of the most fashionable brands in radical politics with guaranteed coverage for their lurid antics and an endless stream of pretty young women willing to make spectacles of themselves for the cameras.

The toxic combination of narcissism, weaponised female rage and bare breasts has made them media darlings. They now have chapters in nine cities across the world including Rio, London, Frankfurt, Paris and Tel Aviv.

Advertisement - Time to SUBSCRIBE now!

Their hallmarks are slogans spray-painted on bare breasts and floral garlands. They’ve embraced many trendy causes from gay marriage to cis-gender rights and have even protested outside the Davos summit, Euro Cup 12 soccer tournament and even mosques but there is no doubting their main targets — Russia, and the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches.



Some of the scenes of their desecrations defy belief as in Argentina last year where Femen-inspired women, snarled, spat and then had sex in front of devout men defending a church from vandalism. Last month another topless group ran screaming around St Peter’s Square in Rome apparently violating themselves with crucifixes before they were bundled away by the police.

So who are Femen and who is paying for them? Who is pulling the strings behind these obscene, marionettes? And why are their offensive actions treated with kid-gloves in a Europe so hyper-vigilant about “hate crimes”? These are among the many questions that surround them.

Femen were launched by a group of Kiev University students campaigning against sex tourism in 2008 and quickly got attention. But as their topless fame grew, the nagging questions increased. How are they able to rent such nice flats in Kiev? How do the girls make a living? The Italian magazine IL Foglio did its own investigation and uncovered some tantalising facts.

Every activist in Kiev gets about one thousand euros per month, the salary of the leaders is 2,500 euros (note that an average salary in Kiev is about 500 euros). In Europe, spending is even higher, and the girls from FEMEN receive €1,000 a day,” the Italian newspaper wrote. (Aug. 20, 2013)

Il Foglio identified an American Jewish businessman called Jed Sunden as a key funder of Femen. Sunden is an enigma himself because of his puzzling business success. After majoring in history at Macalester College in Minnesota, Sunden ended up working in 1993, “sort of by chance,” on a privately funded research project compiling a register of Jewish cemeteries in Ukraine.

Less than two years later, he decided to set up his own English-language newspaper, the Kiev Post. “I was just a poor kid from Brooklyn with a dime and a dream,” he says of himself at the time. Knowing nothing about the publishing business and having a limited knowledge of journalism, Sunden relied heavily on two experienced Jewish journalists, Igor Greenwald and Brian Bonner.

The dream of an English language newspaper in an emerging former Soviet satellite, has brought many experienced publishers to disaster. But Sunden’s paper not only survived, it thrived. He seemed able to effortlessly summon up advertising from airlines and huge corporations such as Coca Cola and Phillip Morris that eluded much bigger independent English-language circulation papers in Poland, Czech Republic and elsewhere.

His magic touch aside, he has been described in his own paper thus: “”He is a libertarian who believes in low taxes and minimal government regulation, in free speech and in free markets. He also takes a critical view of Kremlin political leaders and the threats they pose for Ukraine’s newfound independence.”

Said Femen founder Anne Hutsol: “Jed was the very first influential person who noticed us, helped us with all the resources he had, gave use some useful advice, generously donated and said we were special. Jed was the very first person who helped us in promoting the organization and creating our website.”

Sunden has always refused to say how much he gave to Femen or give precise details why he is doing it. “I confirm that I do give money to Femen,” Sunden said. “I will not state the amount. After meeting with Anna Hutsol, I was impressed with her ideas and have been a supporter. I believe Anna is a young, independent voice in Ukraine. While I do not agree with all of her positions, I believe it is important to give her, and groups like hers, support.” However he appears to have dropped his support since 2011 when Femen switched its focus from the Catholic Church and began protesting against sexism at the soccer’s Euro cup.

But Sunden is not the only person backing Femen. Behind every strong, independent-minded girl pop group there are usually a lot of men pulling the strings. It was true for the Spice Girls, whose “Girl Power” slogan was invented by marketing men. and it is true for Femen for whom the Simon Cowell/Svengali role appeared, at one point, to belong to a staunch Ukrainian nationalist called Viktor Syvatski.

All this emerged during the screening of a documentary about Femen when Syvatski was revealed to be giving these strong independent women, orders. Like Jed Sunden, his main political agenda seems to be keeping the Russian bear at bay.

The Australian film maker Kitty Green revealed “It’s his movement and he hand-picked the girls. He hand-picked the prettiest girls because the prettiest girls sell more papers. The prettiest girls get on the front page. … That became their image, that became the way they sold the brand,” she says. “He is Femen. … He is quite horrible with the girls. He would scream at them and call them bitches.”

The documentary records a phone call between Victor and an activist called Inna. Victor is instructing his topless subordinate on how they will protest the 2012 Euro Cup, held in Ukraine. The conversation is as follows:

Viktor: Well done. Ok, Inna, just between you and me, I’m putting you in charge of tomorrow’s protest. I can’t come and get Alexandra ready, you have to do it. The most important thing is to make sure Alexandra is ready. Also, if the police get close, then beat them with those sticks.

Inna — Just beat them?

Viktor — Beat them on the backs. Don’t be scared. Those idiots won’t do anything. Alexandra, explain it all to her in detail. Tell her that, ****, you know, we gave her $200 to get her here. Explain that. Be strong with her. Explain that after the last fucking protest disaster, if she doesn’t perform then she won’t be invited back. She can go **** herself. And we won’t give her money for her ticket back. Be very strong with her. Very strong. And don’t let Anna talk to her. Alexandra will be dressed as a dictator. On her back, we should write, ‘Create History Together,’ in English.

Inna — Got it. What should we chant?

EURO CUP = KGB? Something very simple and translatable. EURO CUP = KGB. Or KGB 2012? Write these down.

And then last year Syvastki seriously overstepped the mark when he organised a Femen barracking which embarrassed Vladimir Putin at a Hanover trade fair. Bearing the slogan “**** the dictator” the women had to be dragged away.

Now Syvatski appears to be in fear of his life and is seeking asylum in the West after being beaten up and nearly kidnapped by “mystery men.” He no longer has anything to do with Femen, apparently.

For the Ukrainian authorities the last straw came when a Femen activist sawed down a huge cross in a Kiev park in 2012 in support of the jailed Russian punk rock group ***** Riot. The cross was a memorial to the victims of the Cheka and NKVD in the thirties and outraged Ukrainians demanded a criminal prosecution.

Finally facing serious criminal charges, the Femen skipped town and set up in Paris where they have plush city centre offices and a “training centre” for their groups across the world. Who is funding them now is a mystery. They certainly seem to have a sympathetic ear in Paris and applications for welfare benefits were said to be fast tracked.

Femen were inspired by another radical feminist group called ***** Riot who first came to fame when they desecrated Christ the Savior, Moscow’s largest cathedral, with an obscene punk prayer performance aimed at the Patriarch Kirill and Vladimir Putin. Three organisers were jailed in 2012.

Like Femen, the key ***** Riot motivating force seems to be a demented hatred of Christianity in general and the Orthodox Church in particular. But It was the writer Israel Shamir who first pointed out that ***** Riot’s prominent supporters from the Russian arts and media are overwhelmingly Jewish.

These include satirist and cartoonist Viktor Shenderovich, sociologist Igor Eidman, art gallery owner Marat Gelman, socialite and TV presenter Xenia Sobchak and TV station owner Alexey Venediktov.

***** Riot’s cause has also been aggressively taken up by a leading anti-Putin opposition group called the Union of Solidarity with Political Prisoners which is led by another two high-profile Jews, Garry Kasparov and Boris Nemtsov.

And yet another Jewish promoter and thought-leader, Alek D. Epstein, has celebrated them in a publication called “Art on the barricades: ‘***** Riot’, the ‘Bus Exhibit’ and the protest art-activism.”

“None of them is a practicing Jew,” wrote Shamir “but they apparently inherited their hatred to the Church from their forefathers.” Russian allegations that both feminist groups are effectively Jewish sock-puppets have been met with the usual spluttering outrage.

All of which has moved Israel Shamir to make the acid comment. “Russians proved that they care for Christ as much as the French care for Auschwitz, and this shocked the Europeans who apparently thought ‘hate laws’ may be applied only to protect Jews and gays. The Western governments call for more freedom for the anti-Christian Russians, while denying it for holocaust revisionists in their midst.”

***** Riot is also supported — in a circuitous route — by the Soros-funded National Endowment for Democracy. Could it also be that support of groups like ***** Riot is part of a parallel Jewish strategy of debasement and corruption of Christian morality? As Professor Nathan Abrams in jewishquarterly.org /issuearchive/articled325.html?articleid=38 (now a hijacked site) wrote, the very prominent Jewish involvement in porn was a result of the “atavistic hatred of Christian authority” and a desire to “weaken the dominant Christian culture.” Is it so much of a stretch to view Jewish support of these groups as part of the same agenda?

If Femen has learned anything from ***** Riot, it is to keep its source of funding hidden. But not all is well with Femen. Recently there has been mutiny in the ranks when Tunisian activist Amina Sboui quit the group after her questions about funding went unanswered. “I don’t know how the movement is financed. I asked … several times, but I didn’t get a clear answer. I don’t want to be in a movement supported by suspect money. What if it is financed by Israel? I want to know.”

The group were also attacked by their former Brazilian organiser in a dispute about allegedly mis-spent funds. The Brazilian woman, Sara Winter, said that Femen was not what it claimed to be. “Femen Ukraine works as a company or a marketing agency. It is not a social movement. They may have had real good intentions in the past, but nowadays it is entirely corrupted.”

She released a damning email chat in which the Ukrainian leader Inna Shevchenko complained about the sub-par appearance of the Brazilian girls. “(The protest) in the embassy was not sexy because the panties were too tight and the girls appeared to be fat. Be aware of that”, warned the Ukrainian to the Brazilian. (source Opera Mundi)

So has Femen slipped the bonds with their puppet masters? Or are they and ***** Riot both part of elaborate NATO psy-ops operations to destabilize Russia and at the same time further a Jewish agenda of weakening the hold of the church? Throughout the Cold War Western intelligence agencies funded an unlikely assortment of radical arts and feminist movements ranging from modern jazz, the New York intellectuals, experiments in LSD to the pop art of Jackson Pollock and Situationist street pranks that were said to have inspired the Paris riots of 1968.

One of the most interesting is the recruitment of Jewish feminist firebrand Gloria Steinem who helped pioneer feminist street demos in the bra-burning sixties. It is now known that she worked for the CIA via a string of Agency funded organisations, to promote left-liberal chic in opposition to the Soviet Union. Steinem helped create magazines, attended Communist-sponsored youth festivals in Europe, published a newspaper, reported on other participants, and helped to provoke riots.

At any rate, the questions will continue to be asked. In particular, why, after so many obscene actions do the Femen girls still seem to have free pass in the media to stir up hatred? In England recently a man was jailed for more than a year for throwing bacon at a mosque after the killing of soldier Lee Rigby. The Femen women rarely get more than a slap on the wrist or a fine, and they face no movement restrictions or travel impediments.

So is the notion that the unhinged viragos of Femen is Western/ Jewish sock-puppet subversive so ridiculous? No more so than the idea that the CIA-backed the LSD experiments of Timothy Leary or supported the Modern Art movement of Jackson Pollock.

[HFTengineer]

Vashdimi tek votat :


Putin with Chancellor of Germany Angela Merkel in March 2008
On 14 March 2004, Putin was elected to the presidency for a second term, receiving 71% of the vote.[75] The Beslan school hostage crisis took place in September 2004, in which hundreds died. Many in the Russian press and in the international media warned that the death of 130 hostages in the special forces' rescue operation during the 2002 Moscow theater hostage crisis would severely damage President Putin's popularity. However, shortly after the siege had ended, the Russian president enjoyed record public approval ratings – 83% of Russians declared themselves satisfied with Putin and his handling of the siege.[83]

In 2005, the National Priority Projects were launched to improve Russia's health care, education, housing and agriculture.[84][85]




The 2012 Russian presidential election was held on 4 March 2012.[1] There were five officially-registered candidates: four representatives of registered parties and one independent. The election was for a new, extended term of six years.

At the United Russia Congress in Moscow on 24 September 2011, Russian president Dmitry Medvedev proposed that his predecessor, Vladimir Putin stand for the Presidency in 2012; an offer which Putin accepted. Putin immediately offered Medvedev to stand on the United Russia ticket in the parliamentary elections in December and becoming Prime Minister of Russia at the end of his presidential term.[2]

All independents had to register by 15 December, and candidates nominated by parties had to register by 18 January. The final list was announced on 29 January. On 2 March, outgoing President Dmitry Medvedev addressed the nation on the national television channels about the following presidential election. He invited the citizens of Russia to vote in the election to be held on 4 March 2012.[3]

Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin received 63.64% of the vote with almost 100% of the votes counted.[4][5] With this election, Putin secured a record third term in the Kremlin.[6]

Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe observers assessed the voting on the election day positively overall, but assessed the vote count negatively in almost one-third of polling stations due to procedural irregularities.[7] The next presidential election will be in 2018.[