Ca ju be rusise ne 90 nga cifutet nen privatzimin e pasurive ruse Loans for shares https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privatization_in_Russia dhe si u ben miljardere oligraket cifut ne rusi qe ca ironikisht ishin dhe ekonmista te mbeshteteur nga economistet cifut e famshem neoliberal te chicago dhe ny ne kohen e bill klintonit
http://www.softpanorama.org/Skeptics...rd_mafia.shtml
Ndryshuar për herë të fundit nga HFTengineer : 12-11-2016 më 12:26
Consurtiumnew kishte nje artuikull te Alastair Crooke
https://consortiumnews.com/2016/11/1...to-the-elites/
Donald Trump’s unlikely election is a Brexit-like blow to the global elites who espoused an arrogant mix of neocon foreign policy and neoliberal economics that has hurt many common citizens, says ex-British diplomat Alastair Crooke.
By Alastair Crooke
So, there it is: Brexit, as I had earlier suggested, was no extraneous “flash in the pan,” but a manifestation of wider and deeper discontents in Western society. Let us be clear: not only did 60 million Americans vote for Donald Trump, but a further 13 million, who voted for Bernie Sanders (in the primaries) similarly voted for strategic change – albeit from within a different political orientation.
I do not intend, here, to attempt any post-mortem on the U.S. election, but rather to try to see what may stand hidden behind the Brexit and Trump events – obscured for now by their overly prominent presence on the forestage of the media and politics.
Donald Trump and Mike Pence during Day Three of the Republican National Convention. (Photo credit: Grant Miller/RNC)
Donald Trump and his vice-presidential running mate Mike Pence during the Republican National Convention. (Photo credit: Grant Miller/RNC)
The first concerns Donald Trump: Unsurprisingly, his personal foibles and his billionaire background have become the focus of a hostile media who question whether he has the ability to bring about strategic change, or not. This is an important question, but still it misses the point. The point here is that there are few – very few – opportunities for elected officials to challenge the status quo – especially when Western centrist parties have patently conspired to offer voters mere nuanced variants of the same “progressive,” liberal, globalized agenda.
In short, there evidently has been a constituency building up, so exasperated at the imperviousness of the elites to the true situation of this constituency, that they want the status quo gone, by whomsoever’s hand is there. Whomsoever: that is the point. It was never some sort of chief executive beauty contest: Would Bernie Sanders have been an ideal President? Would Nigel Farage have been one? Will Trump be able to deliver a new era? — we do not know (but should not foreclose on that possibility). The Whomsoever aspect rather speaks to the depth of alienation that lay latent in American society.
But the message that is in danger of being obscured by the outsize focus on the outsize personality of Mr. Trump is precisely that the “discontents” at democracy, at cultural “identity” politics, at globalization and its sufferings, will not simply disappear now. Mr. Trump will succeed or fail, but the uprising will persist in one form or another – and is likely to spread to other parts of Europe, leaving the latter in turmoil and politically incapacitated.
Profound Alienation
It represents a profound alienation. We should not expect any early return of the liberal world, should Mr. Trump somehow fail.
Russian President Vladimir Putin with German Chancellor Angela Merkel on May 10, 2015, at the Kremlin. (Photo from Russian government)
Russian President Vladimir Putin with German Chancellor Angela Merkel on May 10, 2015, at the Kremlin. (Photo from Russian government)
Nor should Mr. Trump be viewed as some sort of outlandish political freak. In fact, he fits quite closely to one of the mainstream orientations of American conservatism. It is an orientation that is, by instinct, doubtful of grandiose schemes of political or social re-engineering, preferring to take human nature as it is; it is more inclined to focus on domestic needs, rather than uncertain foreign adventures; is financially conservative; is not economically determinist; and tends to see the family as the indispensable building-block of society. It is a Zeitgeist that sees other countries (say Russia or China) as normal countries with whom one should talk, and to pursue common interests.
That Trump should be regarded as some bizarre oddity, rather than as being in the line of Burke and thrice Presidential contender Pat Buchanan (who admits to a certain paternity, as it were) – speaks more to the success of the neoconservative hijack of American conservatism beginning in the 1960s than reflects the historic spectrum of this intellectual current.
One might say that the neoconservatives were never Conservative, in the sense that neoliberals were never Liberal, in the traditional understanding of these terms. What is new is that the President-elect seems to have put together a new Republican constituency of half the American electorate. And this new constituency is not just one of “red-necks” (white, blue-collar workers). It has cut across social classes and ethnic divisions. Even Wall Street traders (supposedly aligned with the Clintons) reportedly were enthusiastically yelling “lock her up” during Mrs. Clinton’s concession speech – and college-educated women only gave Mrs. Clinton a 6 percent edge over those who voted Trump.
It is possible “that this election [originally] was intended to facilitate the triumphant return of the neoconservative-neoliberal paradigm all wrapped up in ‘new packaging.’ For various reasons, the decision was made to assign this role to Hillary Clinton,” according to the Oriental Review.
Perhaps this was because she was viewed as well placed to fuse the liberal-interventionist and the neoconservative trends to the Clintonite “cultural identity politics” base – or possibly, simply because it was “her turn” at the Presidency. If so, it has failed spectacularly.
The Clinton Failure
Why did it fail? One aspect of the discontent (as I have outlined before – see here) relates to the slow demise of our financialized, neoliberal, debt-driven growth model. For many in America and Europe, the reality has not been one of economic prosperity, but one of anxiety – and for the first time in the post-World War II era – a sense that the next generations’ prospects will be much tougher, and worse, than ours were.
Here (no friend to Trump) is Naomi Klein’s assessment: “They will blame James Comey and the FBI. They will blame voter suppression and racism. They will blame ‘Bernie or bust’ and misogyny. They will blame third parties and independent candidates. They will blame the corporate media for giving him the platform, social media for being a bullhorn, and WikiLeaks for airing the laundry.
“But this leaves out the force most responsible for creating the nightmare in which we now find ourselves … [financialized] neoliberalism. Here is what we need to understand: a hell of a lot of people are in pain. Under neoliberal policies of deregulation, privatization, austerity and corporate trade, their living standards have declined precipitously. They have lost jobs. They have lost pensions. They have lost much of the safety net that used to make these losses less frightening. They see a future for their kids even worse than their precarious present.
“At the same time, they have witnessed the rise of the Davos class, a hyper-connected network of banking and tech billionaires, elected leaders who are awfully cozy with those interests, and Hollywood celebrities who make the whole thing seem unbearably glamorous. Success is a party to which they were not invited, and they know in their hearts that this rising wealth and power is somehow directly connected to their growing debts and powerlessness.
“For the people who saw security and status as their birthright – and that means white men most of all – these losses are unbearable. Donald Trump speaks directly to that pain. The Brexit campaign spoke to that pain.”
Here it is represented visually:
Source: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-1...-its-dominance
Source: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-1...-its-dominance
Of course, this was not the case for the urban élites:
Source: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-1...-its-dominance
Source: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-1...-its-dominance
Cultural Resistance
The second aspect to the present discontent has been cultural oppression (or, in the rhetoric of the Democratic Party, “identity politics” – one of the mainstays of the Clintonite electoral base). Its roots are complex, and lie with philosophic currents emerging out of Germany during WWII that somehow fused with American Trotskyist intellectual thinking (which then migrated to the Right). But, in gist, this current of political thought borrowed from the emerging discipline of psychology the concept of clearing the human mind – shocking it, or forcing it into becoming the “clean slate” on which a new mental program could be written by the psychiatric (or political) therapist respectively.
The political aim here was to eliminate totalitarian thinking, and fascist mental “programming,” and to replace it with a liberal-democracy circuit board.
Indeed, the U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 was promoted by this intellectual group precisely in furtherance of the notion that concepts such as “national culture” would become meaningless as a result of immigrant cultural dilution. By the 1970s and 1980s, the objective had evolved to implant the idea that there was really no politics to modernity (Fukuyama’s End of History) since all governance somehow had boiled down to technocracy: ensuring effective liberal market functioning — a matter best left to experts.
In political terms, the “clearing” of the mind’s inherited cultural clutter was to be achieved by cultural wars of political correctness. The class war had become discredited, but there were other “victims” on whose behalf war could be waged: the war on gender discrimination, on racism, on denial of gay rights and sexual orientation stereotyping, on verbal micro-aggressions, on sexist language, or any ideas or language which disturbed the individual’s sense of “safe space” were used as tools to clear away old cultural “brush” of inherited national culture, and open the way for an American-led, globalized world.
The ostensible factor linking all these notions of victim “wars” was that their antonym amounted either to fascism or authoritarianism. The problem with this has been that any white American blue-collar worker who attended church, who believed in family life, and was patriotic, became potentially a fascist, a racist, a sexist or a bigot.
Many ordinary Americans (and Europeans) disdain this “cultural” war which places him or her (according to Hillary Clinton), in the “‘basket of deplorables’ Right? Racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, islamophobic, you name it,” and who looked upon his or her community as representing nothing more than a “fly-over” state in the view of the U.S. coastal élites.
The deplorables have now risen up. Donald Trump’s salty language was no liability – it was an electoral asset by thumbing his nose at this correctness, and at so-called ”snowflake” sensibilities. Trump’s ‘incorrectness’ touched on a deep vein of resentment within American traditional society.
Not only does “flyover America” resent being termed “deplorables,” they feel too clearly the disdain in which the American and European elites hold them – and dislike their arrogance in suggesting that there is only one rational, sensible way of doing things, and that they – the elites, being the experts and a part of the Davos set – should tell the rest of us what it is: (despite their decades of failures).
High Emotions
Emotions are high on both sides. To gain a sense of how bitterly the cultural war will be fought, listen to this from the partly-Soros-funded populist mobilization movement Azaaz (linked to America’s Move On organization): “Dear Mr. Trump: This is not what greatness looks like. The world rejects your fear, hate-mongering, and bigotry. We reject your support for torture, your calls for murdering civilians, and your general encouragement of violence. We reject your denigration of women, Muslims, Mexicans, and millions of others who don’t look like you, talk like you, or pray to the same god as you. Facing your fear we choose compassion. Hearing your despair we choose hope. Seeing your ignorance we choose understanding. As citizens of the world, we stand united against your brand of division.”
Billionaire currency speculator George Soros. (Photo credit: georgesoros.com)
Billionaire currency speculator George Soros. (Photo credit: georgesoros.com)
In short, with Brexit and the Trump victory, we are witnessing an historic point of inflexion. As I noted in mid-October (quoting British political philosopher John Gray): “If the tension between [the globalization project on one hand] and the [sovereign] nation state, [on the other] was one of the contradictions of Thatcherism … From Bill Clinton and Tony Blair onwards, the center-left embraced the project of a global free market with an enthusiasm as ardent as any on the right. If globalization was at odds with social cohesion, society had to be re-engineered to become an adjunct of the market. The result was that large sections of the population were left to moulder in stagnation or poverty, some without any prospect of finding a productive place in society.”
“If Gray is correct that when globalized economics strikes trouble, people will demand that the state must pay attention to their own parochial, national economic situation (and not to the utopian concerns of the centralizing elite), it suggests that just as globalization is over – so too is centralization (in all its many manifestations).”
Well, the global trend does not seem to be going in the Avaaz direction. It seems rather to be heading toward prioritizing the recovery of the state, of state sovereignty, and of state engagement in the pursuit of economic policies appropriate to the particular circumstances of the state, and in the state’s ultimate responsibility for the welfare of the community as a whole.
The question is what does this mean geo-strategically? And, secondly, can and will, Trump be able to deliver the new era? The short answer is that this new era seems to presage a period of political volatility, financial volatility and in Europe and the Middle East, the prospect of continued political “shock.”
It is clear that Mr. Trump is not a globalist. It is also clear that he is aware of some of the dangers of the present global monetarist policy. He has spoken of the U.S. Federal Reserve creating “big ugly bubbles” and that the next economic and financial crisis has been “kicked down the road” by Fed Chairwoman Janet Yellen – and clearly awaits whomsoever becomes U.S. President on Jan. 20, 2017.
Painted into a Corner
But three decades of debt-led, financialized “growth policies” leave the President-elect effectively painted into a corner: global debt has spiraled; the bubbles are there still (kept afloat by Central Bank coordinated intervention), and bubbles are infamously difficult to deflate gently; zero or negative interest rates are undermining many a business model, but cannot easily be foregone, without crashing the bond market; and QE (printing money) is systematically eating away at consumer purchasing power through the dilution of its newly created purchasing power, and the latter’s re-direction from “main street” into the financial sector – lifting nominal asset values – but creating no tangible wealth.
China's President Xi Jinping.
China’s President Xi Jinping.
America and Europe effectively are in debt-deflation. How then to grow incomes so that producers of goods and services can also afford then subsequently to purchase these goods and services? Trump’s answer is to spend on domestic infrastructure projects. This may help a bit, but is unlikely – in itself – to lift and float the entire U.S. economy.
The reality is that there is no obvious global engine of growth (now that China’s “industrial revolution” has stalled at best). Every nation now is in search of new engines of growth. And it is not easy to imagine that Europe or America will succeed in retrieving all those jobs lost through globalization. Indeed, the attempt so to do – in, and of itself – might just precipitate a further deceleration of world trade, and a consequent decline in output.
In brief, the global economy may see a brief “honeymoon period” thanks to a likely spurt of U.S. fiscal indulgence and a concomitant psychological lift, stemming from – at least – the U.S. construction sector enjoying something of a boom. But ultimately the very economic crisis which Mr. Trump anticipates may prove to be the only way to cut the Gordian knot in which three decades of unprecedented debt and money printing have fettered us.
And if he is to steer through the expected crisis, Mr. Trump will have to eschew the Siren voices of the present elites telling him “TINA” (there is no alternative, but to continue as before).
Where Mr Trump might look for an early (and relatively easy) success however, may be in foreign policy. As “Nixon went to China,” so Trump can go to Russia and China, and begin to treat them as normal nations with whom it is possible to find an intersection of interests (as well as areas of disagreement).
This would be revolutionary. It could change the geo-strategical map. And as President Putin keeps repeating … the door is open (at least for now). Nothing is forever in politics.
Alastair Crooke is a former British diplomat who was a senior figure in British intelligence and
Ndryshuar për herë të fundit nga HFTengineer : 12-11-2016 më 13:13
Ja dhe ky kllouni bernie mbas shume fjalimes qe shkoi tek hillary, ca doli nga wikileaks
Bait and switch tactics.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bait-and-switch
https://usadailyreports.com/wikileak...-unbelievable/
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-john...-by-wikileaks/
Remember how Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton ‘fought mightily’ throughout the Democrat primaries—with Bernie seemingly picking up steam while Team Hillary began to look over its worried shoulder? Turns out ‘the fix’ might’ve been in for months.
The latest WikiLeaks email dump shows top-level Team Hillary members discussing the “leverage” they had over Sanders—to the extent of controlling how Bernie spoke about Hillary during the primary race in May.
It gets even worse, #FeelTheBern crowd.
Another discussion shows Hillary’s advisors scheduling Bernie’s endorsement, and planning how they’ll leverage it to rally the ‘progressive’ vote, in December of last year.
On May 26, 2015, Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook sent an email to campaign chairman John Podesta titled “Sanders criticism” expressing displeasure at some mild insinuations the Vermont senator had made about the Clintons’ massive wealth.
Mook is the same man the Observer reports was already conspiring to rig the Democratic primary in April of 2014 by manipulating the scheduling of state primaries, as evidenced by this email, also from the Podesta leaks.
“This isn’t in keeping with the agreement,” Mook wrote to Podesta of the supposed Sanders infraction.
Since we clearly have some leverage, would be good to flag this for him. I could send a signal via Welch–-or did you establish a direct line w him?”
“Welch” was most likely Rep. Peter Welch (D-VT), Bernie’s fellow Vermonter, one of the first lawmakers to endorse his candidacy.
Then there’s this, gang.
In July of 2015, political opinion writer and self-described Clinton supporter Brent Budowsky told Hillary’s campaign that he was writing “friendly and positive” pieces about Sanders as a ruse to get Bernie’s supporters to vote for Hillary in the general election.
Budowsky wrote:
“When the time is right I will have money in the bank with him [Sanders] and his people as a liberal to urge them to come out in force to vote for HRC.”
Ndryshuar për herë të fundit nga HFTengineer : 12-11-2016 më 13:26
Tani edhe flamuri shqiptar del e proteston kunder presidentit te ri, Trump.
Njeriu mund te kete idete e veta personale, ku shume mire ti shpalose, por pa terhequr ne çeshtje personale, kauzen kombetare dhe flamurin qe ai vet nuk perfaqeson!
Ka shqiptare qe bashkarisht me keto forcat progresiste ( te majta ) qe po protestojne kohet e fundit ne Usa, qe perveç kembeve te tyre, po ngrejne flamure kuq e zi.
Do te ishte me e udhes te kuptohet me pare, kush jane, kush i mbeshtet kata protestues, si nga ana financiare ashtu edhe informacionit si reklame...
Protestat kunder presidentit sapo te zgjedhhur ne Shtetet e Bashkuara Donald Trump, qe ka disa dite qe zhvillohen ne disa nga qytetet me te medha te vendit,
financohen nga nje organizate qe ndryshe njihet si nje fundacion bamiresie, shkruan Daily Caller.
Progress Unity Found eshte nje organizate qe gezon te drejten e mos pagimit te taksave, pikerisht pasi prezantohet si fundacion bamiresie.
Sipas portalit Daily Caller, ky fundacion mbeshtet nga ana financiare " ANSWER" ( Act Now to Stop War End Racism ),
nje kualicion te shume organizatash per te drejtat e njeriut, ku aktiviste "mengjarasho/sallaks/ylberiane" te saj jane perdite neper rruget e qyeteteve amerikane fill pas fitores se Trump.
Protestohet ne Chicago, New York, Wasshington, San Francisco dhe qytete te tjera, shkruan portale Daily Caller.
ANSWER konsideron oranizaten Progress Unity Found si nje "sponsor financues" ku ky Grup kerkon mbeshtetje financiare nga simpatizantet
per te vazhduar protestat kunder Trump, kryesisht ne daten 20 Janar kur presidenti i ri do te hyje ne fuqi, shton Daily Caller.
Neper rruget e qyteteve amerikane ka shume parrulla dhe shkrime ne kartone..., por ajo qe duhet te bej te shqetesohet publikun shqiptar eshte qe,
neser kur te pushojne keto demostrata paqesore ( pak a shume ), neper arkivat e shtypit dhe materialet e filmuara do te mbeten ne kujtese te impresionuara,
flamuret shqiptare, qe pa te drejte perfaqesojne nje komb dhe interesa qe nuk kane fare te bejne me ate flamur...
Ne Shba ka qytetare nga e gjithe bota, por nuk jane perfaqesuar neper protesta me flamuret e shteteve te origjines.
Vetem shqiptari me inteligjencen dhe dipllomacine qe e karakterizon, del si nje "tifoz uligan" neper sheshe dhe bulevarde te protestoje per
" burrin me te fuqishem te globit " ku neser do ti lepije jo vetem duart..............!
Pershendetje.
Psa shqiptare qe thone; "D.Trump nuk eshte presidenti im", shume mire por qe keta nuk jane i gjithe kombi shqiptar!
Ndryshuar për herë të fundit nga arbereshi_niko : 14-11-2016 më 03:53
Mësoi të tjerët me jetën tënde dhe jo me fjalët e tua
jarigas (17-11-2016)
Trump do ia ktheje politiken Amerikane normalitetit, perkundrazi ambicjeve te demokrateve dhe slloganit te tyre ''Beme Baba te te ndaj'' ashtu sic shkaterruan pothuaj Republikanet apo Zotat e Amerikes gjate tere kesaj kohe!
Trump thote; " protestojne pa me njohur mire ".
Ne Amerike kerkohen njerez mercenare per te marshuar neper bulevardet kundrejt nje pagese.
Nje lajme i dites se sotme, gati e pabesueshme, kerkohen aktiviste kunder Donald Trump me 15 $Dollare oren .
Nuk eshte lajm i shpikur, kush do e gjen ne internet.
Por shpejt do te marre fund kjo komedi, ku situata te vendoset ne shinat siç duhet...
Pershendetje
Mësoi të tjerët me jetën tënde dhe jo me fjalët e tua
programi i trump i perbledhur shkurtimisht ne 16 pika ne italisht
Poichè durante la campagna elettorale ci siamo occupati dell’elastico delle mutande di Trump e del marito di Hillary, ritengo di fare cosa buona elencando in sintesi programma di governo di Donald Trump, grazie al contributo della newsletter di Giovanni Palladino da cui ho attinto.
1) metterà un termine al numero di volte in cui un parlamentare può essere eletto. ( richiede un emendamento costituzionale). L’assenza di questo limite ha trasformato il Senato in una casta di bramini inamovibili. Ad esempio John Mc Cain siede in senato da sedici anni e precedentemente ha soggiornato alla Camera dei rappresentanti per diciassette anni. In tutto 33 anni. E’ ora che vada a casa.
2) Blocco delle assunzioni dei dipendenti pubblici con l’eccezione di militari, poliziotti e operatori sanitari.
3) Istituirà il divieto per cinque anni per i dipendenti della Casa Bianca di impiegarsi come lobbisti alla fine del periodo di servizio pubblico. Divieto a vita per essere al servizio di stati esteri.
4) Divieto ai lobbisti di stati esteri di fare donazioni per scopi elettorali negli Stati Uniti.
5) Rinegoziare ( o ritirarsi) dal trattato NAFTA che unisce USA, Messico e Canada. Parimenti, annunziare il ritiro dalla Transpacific Partnership ( Australia, Brunei, Canada, Giappone, Malesia, Nuova Zelanda, Perù, Singapore, Stati Uniti e Vietnam).
6) Cancellare tutti gli stanziamenti dati – o da dare- all’ONU per i programmi di cambiamento climatico e dirigere quei fondi sulla rete idrica e le strutture ambientali degli Stati Uniti
7) Togliere tutte le restrizioni che limitano l’estrazione delle riserve energetiche americane e dare il via a progetti infrastrutturali quali l’oleodotto Keystone ( dal Canada al Texas) bloccato da Obama per ragioni ecologiche.
8) Abolire tutti gli “atti esecutivi” presidenziali incostituzionali emanati dalla presidenza Obama. Molti riguardano atti di guerra decisi senza l’avallo del Congresso.
9) Cancellare ogni finanziamento federale alle città ( grandi comuni) che vietano alla polizia locale di collaborarre coi federali per la repressione della immigrazione clandestina. ( ad esempio non richiedendo i documenti alle persone interpellate).
10) Iniziare le procedure per la nomina del Giudice della Corte suprema mancante dopo la morte di Antony Scalia, defunto di recente. Ma ha anche dichiarato che ha “un elenco di venti giudici che difenderanno la costituzione”. Minaccia cioè un conflitto costituzionale ai giudici progressisti..
11) Espellere i due milioni di immigrati illegali che hanno commesso reati. Cancellare i visti di ingresso negli USA ai paesi che non si riprendono indietro questi immigrati. Sospendere l’immigrazione dalle aree del mondo in conflitto o dove c’è terrorismo.
12) Semplificazione fiscale mirata alla classe media riducendo gli scaglioni da 7 a 3. Una famiglia media con due figli avrà uno sconto fiscale del 35%. Le imprese scenderanno dal 35% al 17 e varerà un condono per i capitali dall’estero tassato al 10%.
13) Lavori sulle infrastrutture REVENUE NEUTRAL ossia lo stato non preleverà tasse da questi lavori realizzati con partnership pubblico-private per le quali conta mobilitare mille miliardi in dieci anni.
14) Lavorare col Congresso ( a maggioranza repubblicano ormai ndr) per rendere deducibili tutte le spese sanitarie per bambini e anziani, creando libretti di risparmio sanitari (con contributo statale per i meno abbienti) e abolendo completamente l’Obamacare. Piano di incentivi alle imprese che creano asili nido infantili in azienda.
15) Legge per contrastare l’immigrazione illegale. Due anni di prigione per rientro di un illegale, portati a cinque se l’infrazione è compiuta da una persona già condannata per altri reati.
16) Trovare una intesa con la Russia che calmi la situazione di tensione internazionale. Vuole inoltre una riforma della N.A.T.O.
per costringere gli alleati ad aumentare i propri stanziamenti sulla Difesa. ( il metodo migliore è far pagare per le truppe stanziate sui territori dei paesi alleati o ritirarle del tutto ndr).
Questi i provvedimenti principali che gli dovrebbero permettere di sostenere il programma di aiuti ai reduci di guerra – ormai numerosi e spesso in miseria- e contrastare con successo le politiche monetarie cinesi che sono la causa prima della delocalizzazione delle imprese che hanno impoverito la classe media e quella operaia americane ( assieme alla delocalizazione in Canada e in Messico e Singapore e Corea).
Adesso avete capito perché la buttavano in caciara…
Antonio De Martini
jarigas (17-11-2016)
Pikat 3 dhe 4 jane ato qe do vertetojne suksesin o deshtimin e fenomenit Trump.
As ndalimi o rritja dhe shpendarja e mirqenies ekonomike nuk do kene rendesi pa zbatimin e luftes kunder "lobingut" qe eshte fatkeqsia kryesore e politikes sot.
Tek ky vullnet o sukses edhe do gjykohet Trump. Po pati sukses mundet te jete qe Trampizmi te kthehet edhe ne ideologji o ne njefare menyre nje teori mbi qeverisjen e drejte.
Shume shume molto interesante...!Postuar më parë nga ATMAN
Por sikunder ka njerez ketu qe nuk dine anglishten, po keshtu ka edhe qe nuk e dine italishten.
Pershendetje
Mësoi të tjerët me jetën tënde dhe jo me fjalët e tua
Programi i presidentit te zgjedhur Trump, perbledhur shkurtimisht ne 16 pika
Pasi gjatë fushatësjemi marre me ushkuret e brekëve te Tramp-it dhe burrit te Hillarit, unë mendoj tebej një gjë të mirë duke renditur një përmbledhje të programit të qeverisë e Donald Trump, në sajë të kontributit të newsletter te John Palladino-s nga ku jam mbeshtetur.
1) do t'i vere cak numrit te herëve që një anëtar i Kuvendit mund të zgjidhet. (kjo gje kërkon një amendament kushtetues). Mungesa e këtij kufiri ka transformuar Senatin në një kastë të murgjish brahmanike te pandërrueshëm. Për shembull, John McCaineshte në Senat prej gjashtëmbëdhjetë vjetesh dhe qëndroi më parë në Dhomën e Përfaqësuesve për shtatëmbëdhjetë vjet. Gjithsej 33 vjet. Është koha për ta çuar në shtëpi.
2) bllokim i punësimit te punonjësve publikë me përjashtim të ushtrisë, policisë dhe punonjësve të shëndetësisë.
3) Ai do të vendosë ndalimin për pesë vjet për punonjësit e Shtëpisë së Bardhë të punësuar si lobistë në fund të periudhës së shërbimit publik. Ndalim te perjetshem per qenien në shërbim të shteteve të huaja.
4) Ndalimi i lobistë të shteteve të huaja për të bërë donacione për qëllime elektorale në Shtetet e Bashkuara.
5) Ri-marrveshje (apo tërheqje) nga NAFTA që lidh SHBA, Meksikë dhe Kanada. Po kështu, tërheqjen nga Partneriteti i Transpaqesorit (Australia, Brunei, Kanada, Japonia, Malajzia, Zelanda e Re, Peruja, Singapori, Shtetet e Bashkuara dhe Vietnam).
6) Fshirja e të gjitha paketave buxhetore të dhëna - ose te premtuara- OKB-se për programet e ndryshimeve klimatike dhe për të drejtuar këto fonde në rrjetin e furnizimit me ujë dhe strukturat mjedisore amerikane
7) heqja e të gjitha kufizimet që pengojne nxjerrjen e rezervave të energjisë amerikane dhe të ndeze semaforin jeshil projekteve te infrastrukturës të tilla si naftësjellësit Keystone (nga Kanadaja në Teksas) bllokuar nga Obama për arsye ekologjike.
8) shfuqizimi të gjitha "akteve ekzekutive" presidenciale antikushtetuese të lëshuar nga presidenca e Obamës. Shumica e akteve perbehet nga ato qe vendosi pa miratimin e Kongresit.
9) Fshirja të gjitha fondeve federale për qytetet (komunate mëdha) që ndalojne policinë lokale për të bashkepunuar me federalet për ndalimin e emigracionit të paligjshëm. (P.sh., duke mos kërkuar dokumentet të ndaluarve).
10) Fillimi i procedurave për emërimin e Gjykatësit te Gjykates së Lartë, pas vdekjes së Antony Scalia, vdekur kohët e fundit. Por gjithashtu thote se ka "një listë prej njëzet gjyqtarëve të cilët do të mbrojnë kushtetutën". Kërcënon keshtu një konflikt kushtetues ndaj gjyqtarëve progresiste ..
11)perjashtimii dy milionë emigrantë të paligjshëm që kanë kryer krime. Ndalimi i vizave te hyrjes në SHBA për vendet që nuk duan te marrin këto emigrantë mbrapa. Pezullimi i emigracionit nga zona të botës ku ka konflikt ose terrorizëm.
12) Thjeshtimii taksave per të klasën e mesme, duke i ulur nga 7 deri 3. Një familje mesatare me dy fëmijë do të ketë një zbritje të taksave 35%. Bizneset do të bien nga 35% në 17 dhe të nisë një amnisti për kapitalin nga jashtë me tatim me 10%.
13) Punime në infrastrukturat REVENUE NEUTRAL, ne kuptimin se shteti nuk do të shkoj të marr taksa nga këto vepra të bëra me partneritetet publike-private për të cilat ka mobilizuar një milion miliardesh në dhjetë vjet.
14) Duke punuar me Kongresin (shumica republikane tani ed) për zbritjen të gjitha shpenzimeve shëndetësore për fëmijët dhe të moshuarit, duke krijuar llogaritë e kursimeve shëndetësore (me kontributin e shtetit për të varfërit) dhe duke shfuqizuar plotësisht Obamacare. Plan fiskale per te nxitur bizneset që krijojnë çerdhe të fëmijëve nëper ndermarrje.
15)ligj për të luftuar emigracionin e paligjshëm. Dy vjet burg për ri-hyrjen e një të paligjshmi, shtrirë në pesë nëse vepra është kryer nga personi i dënuar më parë për vepra të tjera.
16) Gjetja e një marrëveshjeje me Rusinë për të qetësuar situatën e tensionit ndërkombëtar. gjithashtu kërkesa e një reforme të N.A.T.O.
për të detyruar aleatët për të rritur ndihmesat e tyre në fushën e mbrojtjes. (Metoda më e mirë është për t'u paguar për trupat amerikane në territoret e vendeve aleate, ose terheqjen krejtësisht te tyre ed).
Keto, pak a shume janë masat kryesore që duhet të lejojnë jetesimin e programit e ndihmës për veteranët e luftës - tani të shumte dhe shpesh ne vobektesi- dhe përballjen me sukses te politikave monetare kineze që janë shkaku kryesor i zhvendosjes së kompanive që kanë varfëruar klasën e mesme dhe ate punetore amerikane (së bashku me zhvendosjen në Kanada, Meksikë, Singapor dhe Kore).
Tani ju e kuptoni pse e kthenin ne rrumpalle ...
Antonio De Martini
Jarigas
Regullat e Postimit
Përgjigju Duke Cituar
Krijoni Kontakt