Close
Faqja 0 prej 7 FillimFillim 12 ... FunditFundit
Duke shfaqur rezultatin -19 deri 0 prej 124
  1. #1

    Kutia E Pandores - Pandora's Box

    Duke qene se ky liber eshte shume i veshtire te sigurohet, mendova ta hedh ne forum te plote per te gjithe anglisht folesit. Eshte hera e pare qe po toleroj nje teme te plote ne anglisht por duhet kuptuar qe materiali eshte shume voluminoz (587 faqe), koha per ta perkthyer eshte komplet e paqene dhe rendesia dhe vlera e ketij libri eshte tejet e madhe. Nuk ekziston pothuajse ne asnje librari apo biblioteke dhe eshte shperndare komplet nendore ose underground. Nuk i rezistova dot tundimit per ta hedhur ne forum. Mendoj se te interesuarit si nga historia (sidomos asaj e mesjetes se hershme, te vone dhe rilindjes) ashtu dhe nga teorite konspirative, do dine ta vleresojne marrjen e nje materiali te tille qofte dhe ne gjuhe te huaj.

    Qe t'ju pergatis pak per permbajtjen e ketij libri, ne te do hasni fillimisht konceptin e disinformacionit, cfare perben ne vetvehte dhe si aplikohet, histori te tribuve izraelite dhe krijimi i aristokracise europiane prej tyre, kuptimin e fjales cifut ashkenazi apo kahzar, lindja dhe zhvillimi i aristokracise europiane, transferimi i saj ne Amerike, lindja e klases sunduese ne Amerike dhe kush eshte ne fakt pronari me i madh i saj, pse thuhet vazhdimisht qe cdo president ne Amerika ka gjak aristokrat, teori te ndryshme konspirative etj. Sic e thashe libri eshte voluminoz por materialet qe permban jane shume te qarta e te kuptueshme. Eshte botimi i rishikuar duke shtuar disa nga faktet e tjera mbas botimit te pare por qe sidoqofte i referohet ngjarjeve deri ne vitin 1995. Me pas, ne vitin 2007 u be nje tjeter ribotim te ketij libri duke i nderruar dhe kopertinen por fatkeqesisht kete version e kam te pamundur ta konvertoj per forumin dhe do hedh vetem versionin qe e kam ne OCR. Mjafton deshira e mire per ta lexuar dhe do zbuloni me te vertete nje Kuti te Pandores. Qe nga vitit 2000 e ketej, e kam lexuar kete liber mbi 4 here dhe ju siguroj qe ajo qe do gjeni ne rradhet e ketij libri jo vetem do ju mahnisi por edhe ndryshoje komplet shume nga konceptet qe keni sot per realitetin. Lexim te kendshem.

  2. #2





    TABLE OF CONTENTS





    1. The Origins of Misinformation .................................................. .................................................. ..... 1
    2. Who are the Real Israelites?....................................... .................................................. .................... 5
    3. England, France and the Holy Grail .................................................. ................................................ 15
    4. Knights Templar .................................................. .................................................. ........................... 31
    5. A Sailor Story .................................................. .................................................. ............................ 41
    6. In Search of the New Jerusalem the New World .................................................. ............................. 45
    7. The Lost French Dauphin........................................... .................................................. ...................... 51
    8. The Bloodline of Kings .................................................. .................................................. ................. 61
    9. The Catholic Church............................................ .................................................. ........................ 70
    10. Ignatius Loyola, Jesuits. The Illuminati and the Creator........................................... ......................... 77
    11. The English Feudal System................... 85
    12. Money and Banking .................................................. .................................................. ...................... 89
    13. The Virginia Company........................................... .................................................. ......................... 95
    14. The Mayflower Compact .................................................. .................................................. ............... 109
    15. Early Railroads of France............................................ .................................................. .................... 111
    16. Land Acquisitions of American .................................................. .................................................. ..... 113
    17. Washington D.C. and the Name Change of the Virginia Company .................................................. 127
    18. Do You Really Understand the term United States? .................................................. ....................... 137
    19. The I l l u m i n a t i going to America .................................................. .................................................. . 143
    20. The Early Alabama Railroads .................................................. .................................................. ....... 153
    21. The American Indian vs. Industrial America and the Railroads .................................................. ...... 163
    22. Southern Gold Rush.............................................. .................................................. ...................... 169
    23. The Railroads Building and Empire .................................................. ................................................ 177
    24. Lewis Cass Payseur 1850-1939.............................................. .................................................. .......... 199
    25. The Springsteins...................................... .................................................. ........................................ 229
    26. The Secret Life and Death of Abraham Lincoln .................................................. ............................. 247
    27. Railroads and the Civil War .................................................. .................................................. .......... 253
    29. Acts of Treason and the 37th Congress .................................................. ........................................... 259
    30. Who was Albert Pike?............................................. .................................................. ........................ 265
    31. The Reconstruction Period-Post Civil War .................................................. ..................................... 267
    32. Trust. Trustees and Anti-Trusts............................................ .................................................. ........... 279
    33. Assets of Lewis Cass Payseur .................................................. .................................................. ........ 283


    35. Railroad Leases .................................................. .................................................. ............................. 293
    36. The Vanderbilt Empire............................................ .................................................. ......................... 315
    37. The Andrew Carnegie, Steel Deal .................................................. .................................................. . 324
    38. Companies owned by the Railroads .................................................. ................................................ 326
    39. Railroad Operating Companies .................................................. .................................................. ..... 330
    40. The Dominated Control of Money and Credit .................................................. ................................. 334
    41. Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 .................................................. .......................................... 344
    42. The True Federal Reserve Story............................................. .................................................. .......... 350
    43. John D. Rockefeller, Standard Oil and World Monopolies........................................ ........................ 358
    44. Asset Acquisition .................................................. .................................................. ........................... 373
    45. Elliott Springs and Hugh William Close .................................................. ......................................... 374
    46. Eisenhower's Farewell Address........................................... .................................................. ............ 390
    47. The Fortune 500 Companies.. ... 392
    48. Global Monopoly .................................................. .................................................. .......................... 400
    49. Common Law and the Farmer.... .................................... .................................................. ................ . 406
    50. A Plan to Starve the American People .................................................. ............................................ 410
    51. Mercury Poisoning ot the Body .................................................. .................................................. .... 416
    52. Sodium Fluoride.......................................... .................................................. ..................................... 418
    53. No Respect for Human Life .................................................. .................................................. .......... 422


    54. Technology of Today............................................. .................................................. ................. 426
    55. The Rex 84' and F.E.M.A .................................................. .................................................. ...... 432
    56. The John F. Kennedy Assassination .................................................. ........................................ 436
    57. Weyerhaeuser and Boise Cascade .................................................. ........................................... 456
    58. The Bechtel Family............................................ .................................................. .................... 466
    59. The Railroads and Aliens .................................................. .................................................. ...... 468
    60. The Apotheosis Project .................................................. .................................................. .......... 472
    61. An Alien Abduction Account........................................... .................................................. ........ 477
    62. How to Survive the Tribulation Times .................................................. ..................................... 481
    63. Our Country has Lost its Sovereignty....................................... ................................................. 489

    64. Sweet White Poison .................................................. .......... .................................................. ... 509
    65. The United States has a New National Religion .................................................. ....................... 511
    66. The Crime Control Act of 1993 .................................................. ............................................... 513
    67. The Committee of 300 .................................................. .................................................. ........... 517
    68. Who Originated the Plot for World Domination? .........
    69. Addendum .................................................. .................................................. ............................ 523
    70. Miscellaneous .................................................. .................................................. ........................ 525
    71. United States Railroad Maps.............................................. .................................................. ...... 529
    72. Laws .................................................. .................................................. ...................................... 585
    73. Book References........................................ .................................................. .............................. 604

  3. #3
    INTRODUCTION




    This book has to be classified as a one-of-a-kind novel. It is a compilation of four years of extensive research; the information in it is only my interpretation of what appears to be the truth. Nothing in life has a value or is believable for a person, unless that person allows something to become a truth or value in their life especially within their experience. Therefore. 1 must tell you that this is a fiction novel based on information that I have found hidden away in a l l types of corners, here and there. For most people, this information is too incredible; if they believed the information, it would rip their lives apart, if you believe this information it makes an island out of you and no one likes being alone on an island. Almost everyone in this country and the world likes being a sheep. I watch flocks of sheep and where one leads they all follow. It seems that they don't have the intelligence to really be an individual. Most people appear to like it that way. In truth, people are about to be lead to the slaughter. The bottom lin e about this book is that it only has as much truth to it as vou allow it to have. If in doubt, you can also do the research and see for yourself.


    In 1988, I was in the midst of building my dream house in Florida. For almost two years I had been feeling changes that I couldn't explain. The only way to describe them was that it felt like I had something very important to do and that it was urgent that I start doing it right away. Whatever this "thing" was. the thoughts about it consumed my life. But what was it? I hadn't a clue. I only knew it had to do with knowledge. Knowledge of what, though? I asked many of my patients and friends if they had ever had feelings like that, but none of them had. They told me that I was just getting old. I really didn't l i k e that analogy. Then one day, in September of 1988 while working on my new home. I heard this terrible rumble on the far side of the house. The house was vibrating like an earthquake. I ran to the other side of the house to the only window on that side that just happened to be in the bathroom. There I saw a big bulldozer having a fight with a pretty little pine tree that just did not want to be mowed down. The dozer would push it down and the tree would spring back up. This sight broke my heart for some reason. I really do love the trees and hate to see them removed, but this time this one really had an impact on me. I started crying and beating my fist on the walls asking who am I. what am I, what am I doing here, why is life so rotten, and why do I have to live such a hard life to only die and to feel l i k e I never had any freedom? With tears running down my face I turned to leave the bathroom and at that time (10:00 A.M. in the morning with the sun to the east) through the French doors on the west side of the house came a blinding light into my face. The next thing I knew my wet face was dry and the tears were gone and I was at peace with everything and I knew that I had to write a book.


    Me write a book? What a joke! That thought did not leave me alone. I checked the time and it was now 2:30
    P.M. Where did the time go? No way I could have been in the bathroom for four and a half hours walking around in circles. 1 can't t e l l you what happened to me that day, I only know that it changed my life and I can never go back to being a sheep again. I am now an island of knowledge. This book is the sum total of my life from that time until now. This book is only a brief version of the knowledge I have acquired since that day in the bathroom. That knowledge was the result of an effort to discover what is really happening in our world today; that day I asked to find the truth out about everything, and I desired to know only the real truth.


    There is no way to easily sum up this book. I can only tell you that since 1988 I have been lead back and forth across this country four times to find this information out from people - people that I should never have known. I know angels are always around me, they have done some really wild things in my life to help me out of tight squeezes. They have guarded and cared for me. that I might live. This is not my imagination; I can reallv feel them and sometimes I can smell them. They have an u l t r a sweet flower smell. There have been whole days that they have stayed with me. everywhere I went, even in my vehicle and to the store, then back in the vehicle and to the house. One day. we begged the angel that stayed with us all day. to appear and talk to us. On that night, a twelve foot being appeared just outside the picture window of my house and my mate lost it and fell over three chairs. Almost as a response to our state of shock at its appearance, it vanished, as if it was a hologram.


    All the so-called authorities out there that think that they really have a grip on who is doing what and who owns and is controlling everything in the world—don't have a clue as to what is really behind things! Everyone goes around blaming the Rothschilds for everything, but who is behind the Rothschilds? (who are, by the way, all dead now.) The last one was supposedly murdered two years ago. In this book you will find

    out who really runs the world conspiracies and corporations world-wide. You have to go back to the past- genesis to find out about today. You can not start researching today's information in books, and ever expect to find the real root of truth about hidden planetary power control. One half of the information in books out there was created to mislead you. This becomes evident if you start studying books and information about the ones in control and how everything came to be as it is todav. You have to go back to the beginning in the old federal, state and county records and proceed forward in the records. The two paths of information will by pass each other, like two passing trains in the night. The information that is out there in public libraries and such will never meet with t h e other (true information). Consequently, you have all been running around the crust of the pie for decades, and you have never found the meat of the pie.


    In the fall of 1992, I talked to a man. that at one time had actually been a part of and had participated in the organizational meetings for the "New world Order". He knew all of their plans. In the past year this man has become very well know. He has been traveling all of the states spreading the word and blowing the whistle as he says, his name is Carl Sanders.


    He had also worked for the industrial defense companies. IBM, TRW, Mellon Institute and many more. He had for many years been involved with the engineering, design and development of highly advanced technology. Technology used in the Phoenix Projects and later the Montauk Project that involved time travel. While this man was speaking to me about these subjects and when I was able to pick my jaw up off the floor I did manage to ask him about where their present level of technology is today. He went into great detail to tell me that the stuff that we see on T.V. and in the movies that we think is fiction is not even close to the reality of where the technology is. My jaw dropped again. I ' m thinking about Star Wars, and Star Trek now. He also confirmed the governments and the corporate worlds involvement with aliens and our deriving technology form them. He said that what we see out here in view is about 75 to 100 years behind what the nebulous "They" have to use on us.


    I asked him about all of the information in this book, including railroad ownership of all the odd sections and some even sections of land in this country, and what the government planned to do with it if the leases were not renewed by June 17. 1993 or December 31, 1995 (which they have not been as of t h i s up date November
    10, 1994). He told me that my dates were, in his words, real dates to look out for things to really start happening, he said that the government had purposely not done anything about the true ownership of the lands being held in trust for the operation of the United States Military Railroad System, and that they had just been letting everything ride and "yes", they did plan to take the land back from whom ever might be occupying the land at the conclusion of the leases".


    That is what this book is, the "meat". Get ready to have the meal of your life!






    Sincerely,








    Alex Christopher

  4. #4
    THE ORIGINS OF MISINFORMATION





    The methods of recording the events of the past for posterity and the edification of future generations have changed over the millennia. Thousands of years ago knowledge of past events was passed on from generation to generation in the form of stories, related by fathers to sons and to others willing to listen.


    The origin of the word "History" comes from that practice of narration in that each legend so recited would be "his story", but the advent of writing changed the method of recital.


    Historians became relatively passive, relating their story just once, leaving the efforts of learning to the reader.


    The spoken, or narrated story changed down through the ages and the telling, mutating into far more than the realities of the original exploits of the principal players in the drama into legends extolling the super human characteristics of the heroes of the saga, but also at the same time they would degenerate into nothing more than mere legends.


    But transcribe "his-story" into writing thereafter cannot be changed, or can it?


    Aside from the origins of the word which describes the discipline, there is also a related and unwritten law: History' has always been written by the winners.
    Contrary to popular belief, it is neither a legal requirement nor a fact that the winner always writes a true account of history, If the victor is corrupted, or has interests to protect from the public, for example: why the war was created in the first place, he is in a position, being the winner, to make sure that the unsuspecting public never gets to know.


    How? He simply writes and rewrites the history books, or causes the history books to be re-written, and everyone knows that the history books are correct, aren't they?


    Wars have been fought down through the millennia, and almost always, when over, the victor always gets to write down the results. Where the "true" accounts of the "magnificent exploits" of the victorious are applauded and extolled to the world (whatever comprised "The World" at that time), the comments and observations of the vanquished have been ( i f not outright destroyed) suppressed, and consigned to a dusty, second rate status of "archives (written by nobodies)", thereafter to slowly decompose into the mists of antiquity and (hopefully) never again reach the light of day.


    The victor is therefore exalted as the one who had "right" (and inevitably, God as well) on his side, and the vanquished become in posterity, if not criminals, then simply mis-informed non-entities who fought for a lost and often evil cause. If anyone should doubt that, then consider how history would be written today (in either Japanese for the U.S. side of the Atlantic and the Pacific, or German for the European and North African theatre) should the "nasty other side" have won the second world war! What then would become of the British "Stiff upper lip, old chap" or the "American Way of Life", or any of the other colloquial cliches which are abused in describing this "wonderful?" Current way of life?


    If the ownership of control of the Power and/or Lands and/or ideals (and "ideals" usually disguises want of either power or land, or both) have not been decided by the Act of War, then such "coups" have usually been accomplished in other ways.


    (1). Assassination has always been a good, clean way. Simply k ill the incumbent leader; this method has a time honored history.


    (2). A more insidious method (but still effective) is the usurping of the authority and power by one or more individual(s) who. while appearing to be loyal to the master, manage, through one means or another, take away his power. This method can be broken down into several sub-methods.

    1

    (a). Cause the incumbent leader to "fall from grace" (this most likely in the case of a politician), but, in this instance, make sure you are yourself popular in the public eye, in order to be able to take over, or:


    (b). Wait until the King is incapacitated by some debilitating illness and unable to take care of his kingdom (or estate), then surreptitiously take it out from under him, or;


    (c). Wait until just after the King dies, (even if prematurely) then.




    (i). Place the heir on the throne while making sure he has no ability or opportunity to exercise any power until you have exerted enough influence over the inexperienced new monarch to get him to leave everything in your control, then you kill him; or


    (ii). Employ method number one against the heirs and descendants of the King. That is kill the heir, then place someone else, a close relative, perhaps, on the throne, but be sure that the new King is someone who is (a) popular with the masses (such a member of a family which used to be in control), and (b) someone whom you can directly, or indirectly control, and have h i m appear to be in control, but, in reality, control everything directly yourself.


    (3). As a side thought, the "Wars" do not have to be wars which involve armies, tanks, ships and aircraft and weapons of mass destruction, unless they are for a "major cause", they can also be minor "wars" or "conflicts", or "police actions", or "peace-keeping efforts" of a political or economic nature.


    Where we are not dealing with the likes of the King or a Country, there are other ways which deal, more specifically, with individuals or corporations, but most of the methods adopted against the individual or companies embody, at least in principle, a rough approximation ( i f not direct copy) of, those outlined above.


    Of course, there are more subtle and ingenious ways to wrest control of assets from others, but there is not enough space in this book to address all the finer details of that particular craft, only those which pertain to the main subjects and object of t h i s book.


    This book will address the events relative to the time period from Biblical time but (predominantly the 1700's and
    1800's) before the American Civil War; then the events of the Martial Law period of the Civil War, and then the developments after the Civil War Martial Law period up to the present day and all the hidden secrets that 1 have been able to uncover and the possible or probable events of the future and all the intertwining connections.


    It is the intention of the author, to present the real facts pertaining to the true history of the development of the state of affairs that have not only unfolded into the United States of America but how it reaches into the other countries of the world.


    Many hundreds of books including school text books and other fictional or non-fictional books on the History of The United Slates have been written by many well renowned and famous historians, and it is not the intent of this author to malign or disparage their efforts in any way.


    Other writers have attempted to "educate" the general public with other literary efforts, which, while the authors claim many years of dedicated and diligent research, either failed to conduct such research, or, in the worst cases, relied upon gossip and "research" of persons who not only had a complete lack of knowledge regarding the subject matter, but had little if any knowledge as to how to properly use a library. It therefore stands to reason that such authors can and could not hope to achieve their claimed elevated status as revelers of the real truth owing to the fallacious nature of their methods of research and inquiry.


    Still other "writers" claim to have gleaned their immense knowledge of the subject matter through intimate friends "on the inside" of corporations and/or the activities which form the primary subject matter of their "books". While this, on the outside, may offer some means of finding out things otherwise impossible to discover, and even may seem to be the only way to get to the bottom of the "problem", it also should be realized that those "friends" have, not only their own interests, job, and families to protect, but, in some cases, matters of national security, and therefore are not going to give over vital or even truthful information for fear of reprisal or worse!. Where the

    2

    informant is perhaps an executive of this corporation, even then, contrary' to popular belief, executives are not always privy to the real truth, and are often manipulated by the deliberate dissemination of misinformation and, in some matters, kept entirely "in the dark" by their superiors.


    While in some circumstance it is necessary to rely on the efforts of some of the true historians of the past in gaining source material for a pending publication, the author also must be very careful in selecting truly relevant historical material, and therefore must adopt several rules regarding his sources, namely;


    (a). If it is necessary to rely on historical authors, choose well known and respected authors, whose books are well and truly corroborated by other respected historians, or (b). while they are an interesting source of information, no newspaper or magazine article can be relied upon for, or regarded as the true version of concrete historic fact. This should be an obvious choice, yet so many disregard it. While some newspaper articles in the more respected newspapers are quite truthful, factual and beyond reproach, it is generally accepted that they are, at best a dramatic embellishment.


    The other notable type of article as presented is by the proverbial supermarket tabloid, and can only be described as an entirely fictional account of a non-existent event, such as shown by the headlines, "Man dies in love-pact with 47 cows", or "Mink Coat comes alive at dance and bites owner to death", or the ever popular stories of the latest antics of the Hollywood superstars which are presented by such magazines in such a way as to cause the subject of such pseudo-libel to have little or no legal recourse, while affording said tabloid the luxury of cashing in on the gossip hungry people who buy such supermarket newspapers and magazines.


    And yet some of these above mentioned less than thorough researchers rely on the likes of these newspaper stories. fictions and gossips as "historic fact".


    Of the more respectable and irrefutable newspaper articles, the majority, such as those written at or about the turn of the twentieth century which deal with such subject matter as the persons of the Rockefellers, or J.P. Morgan, the Lehman Brothers. Thomas Edison, Marconi Etc., or which trumpet the achievements of the government of the day. as shall be shown in subsequent pages, can only be relied upon to furnish proof of the existence of such people or the government, and to furnish a reasonable assumption that the purported actions of those people did take place, and not as a true and correct record as to what those people or governments did or why or when they did it.


    In both Corporate and government circles, the "news" is nothing more than the information those particular
    "leaders" wished to be made public at that time. In short, Propaganda.


    If you, the reader, should doubt that statement, consider the way that the media has been used to document the actions of the government since the American Korean War. sorry, the Korean "Police Action", and every other "war" or "conflict" since then. How many of the true facts emerged into the realms of the general public?


    A true and correct account of history cannot be achieved by viewing today's result of prior actions, and then attempting to deduce what possible singular action it was which achieved that particular result. Although this may be relatively accurate for the short term, it becomes hopelessly inaccurate in the long term.


    I might view a building and, from its form, function, architecture and design, and who visits it and why. I might deduce that it is a MacDonalds (hamburger business?), built around 5 years ago, obviously a thriving business in the area and doing well after 5 years. 1 might delve a little deeper into the mystery and also consult with a local individual and find out that it is actually a franchise which is 5 years old. but that the headquarters of the company. that is the parent company is about 20 years old, that and the "M" of the Golden Arches obviously is the scriptic design of the "M" of MacDonalds. But go to the intersection of Lakewood and Florence Boulevard in Downey (90241) in California and view the 1950s style structure which is one of the surviving buildings of the original chain started in San Bernadino in California, and you will see in the buildings' design where the famous Golden Arches came from.


    For a true history of the formation and development of the United States of America, and the so-called American industrial revolution, there are several areas in which to research which offer a wealth of information, the following are just a few:

    3

    1. Congressional Records, Library of Congress, and official Historical Societies.
    2. Law libraries and the libraries of various universities which are recognized as being among the best in teaching law and its practice.
    3. Specialist historical publications by authors recognized by their peers (betters, not equals).
    4. The records of lineage and achievements of such legally recognizable entities as the National Historical
    Society, the Mayflower Society etc.
    5. Family record, of those families involved from the beginning in the areas of interest.


    All of the above are extremely useful in finding the bones of the truth, but the meat of the proof must be found elsewhere.


    There is one area which is available to all, and all can view it at anytime. The information sought in this area, is, when acquired, legally admissible in to any Court in the land, as against, for example, library records (which do not constitute legally admissible evidence). In order to tap into this wealth of knowledge and proof, the researcher must have at least a better than rudimentary knowledge of the subject matter (acquired through the use of all the research areas mentioned in clauses 1-5 above), and an ability to ferret out the real historical facts from the fictional propaganda.


    The sequence of research, in the case of the famous MacDonalds, in order to find out exactly when and where the company was formed, is to go first to the Head Office to ask when and where. Then, to make sure, go to the County Court House of the particular State and County, and research the Books of Corporations and find the actual document of Incorporation which must, by law, be filed in that courthouse. If you cannot then find it, there are four possibilities:


    (a). They were mistaken (or worse) at head office;
    (b). The documentation for MacDonalds is not in the index, either intentionally or inadvertently omitted:
    (c). The corporation is not called MacDonalds at all. but another name, in which case go back to the Head Office,
    or:
    (d). The records have been removed (either by authority or stolen) or destroyed, or both.


    Then to find out what they did, look at the books of Deeds (not just real estate deeds, every "deed" or "action" or "event") recorded in that courthouse under the true name of the corporation and in every other County Courthouse in which that corporation conducts or conducted its business.


    Any way you look at it, to get at the real truth and to create an accurate history of what happened, you must "get to the bottom of it" and go to the courthouse to find the truth.


    The "bones" of this book have been created from the sources as outlined in Clauses 1 through 5 above.


    Where and when possible, and more particularly concerning the time period encompassing the early development of the United States of America to the present day, the "meat" on those bones has been provided from the real historic archives of the United States of America, namely the County and Municipal Courthouses and other similarly oriented depositories which present the legally admissible documentary proof of the main objective of this book, which is, simply stated, that:
    This is chiefly an attempt to try to set the "record" of history straight, by showing you, the reader: (1). How History has been written by the winners.
    (2). That History is Still, today, being written by the "winners" (Usurpers).
    (3). That the History which the population has been taught in the schools is not the true History as reflected and proven in the Legal Record Books.
    (4). That History is, unfortunately, still being repeated!











    4

  5. #5
    WHO ARE THE REAL ISRAELITES?




    Although we are supposed to be l i v i n g in an enlightened world, and in many ways we are, when it comes to understanding who or where the Twelve Tribes of Israel are in the world today, we find only a limited amount of information, and much of it is conjecture.


    The following information, along with the migration map will be helpful in shedding more light and understanding on this most important and timely subject.


    We are endeavoring to show that the Twelve Tribes of Israel in the world today are none other than the peoples which comprise the Anglo-Saxon, Celtic, Germanic, Scandinavian and kindred peoples. Since they are scattered throughout the world, it is difficult to have an accurate estimate of how many Israelites (real Israelites) there are living at this time, but there are some who estimate that there are between six and seven hundred million. The promise which is stated in the scriptures made some 3800 years ago to Abraham, Isaac and Isaac's sons (the Sax- sons) as recorded in the book of Genesis, has come to pass. The promise was reiterated specifically to Jacob, who was given the name "Israel".


    The first time that Abraham was told that his progeny would be a blessing to all nations of the world, and would be a great host of people, is found in the Twelfth chapter of Genesis, but for this study we will consider chapter twenty-two where the Lord appears the second time to Abraham to repeat and confirm what we call today the "Abrahamic Covenant."


    Consider verses fifteen through eighteen which state: "And the Angel of the Lord called unto Abraham out of heaven the second time and said, "By myself have I sworn, saith the lord, that in blessing I will bless thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the seashore; and in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed, because thou hast obeyed my voice."


    For many centuries the peoples which comprise "Anglo-Saxondom" have practiced some kind of faith to God. They are found in every nation and people in the world, and they have also been a blessing in other ways to the have-not nations of the world.


    Most Christians are aware that the Israelites were carried into captivity, but many know little about the details. A short synopsis of this story is found in second Kings, chapter eighteen. There we read of this deportation of Israel and, a few years later, most of Judah. In approximately 730 B.C. Shalmaneser (king of Assyria) invaded Israel, and we read in verses 11 and 12: '"and the King of Assyria did carry away Israel unto Assyria, and put them in Halah and in Harbor by the river of Gozan, and in the cities of the Medes, because they obeyed not the voice of the Lord their God. but transgressed his covenant."


    In verse 13, it states that seven years later the Assyrian army came up against the remaining cities of Judah and took them. Only Jerusalem remained under King Hezekiah's control.


    Eventually the city of Jerusalem was also destroyed as the people continued to struggle. In the year 596 B.C., Nebuchadnezzar, King of Babylon, came and besieged Jerusalem, and took the inhabitants approximately 22,000 into what we call the Babylonian Captivity.


    This is a short history in a nutshell, so to speak, of Israel's deportation and subsequent captivity. However, the important thing that we need to remember is that, when almost the entire population of all twelve tribes of Israel were taken captive by the armies of Assyria, they were placed in the area of the Caucasus Mountains to the North of their Homeland. There they remained for approximately one hundred years, and became known as Caucasians, most of these people had fair skin, blonde, or reddish-blond or light-brown hair and light blue or blue-green eyes. The name Caucasian has remained as part of their identity ever since that time. Most people have no idea whatsoever of the connection between the Caucasians and the Israelites of Bible history and prophecy. Refer to the chapter about England, France and the Holy Grail.






    5

    In fact, the great majority of the peoples of "Anglo-Saxondom" today have little, if any, idea as to why they happen to be called Caucasians. When a person seeks employment it is not unusual to find the question asked as to whether they are of Caucasian descent. Most people answer "yes" without thinking of the historic reason for this designation.


    Secular history records, that the twelve tribes were never really lost, but had just taken on a different name. The map shows the different routes taken by the Israelites when they left the area of the Caucasus mountains and migrated over into Europe during the subsequent years. They were not known as "Israelites" during this trek Westward, but by the various names as shown on the map. Later, as they settled in various parts of Europe, they took on the names by which we know the countries today. Collectively, we call them the "Western Christian nations". As the movement west continued, we find that a representative number of the twelve tribes gathered here on this North American Continent.


    The prophets Isaiah and Micah prophesied that in the last days a great and mighty nation would arise. It would be a prosperous nation, and be called Jacob, i.e. Israel, and this great prosperous nation and it's people would honor God. Today millions of people from other cultures and races are seeking to migrate to America and Canada to have a share in our materia! prosperity.


    The prophet Hosea prophecies about the future restoration of Israel, which has now been fulfilled for the most part. You need to realize that the Caucasian race (the peoples which comprise Anglo-Saxondom) are the Israelites talked about in the Bible, We are the real Jewish race.


    The above information is one of the best kept secrets of our time. The people that are in control and are trying to take over the world do not want a certain part of the population of this country and many others to know that they are the chosen people not the ones that are in old Israel trying to reestablish the home front there. The lost tribes, the "chosen people", are found en masse in the United States. They are the light-haired, blue or blue-green-eyed people.


    In the year of 1992 in a little town above Bonners Ferry, Idaho, there was a family by the name of Weaver that was ripped apart and was used as an example. This family were members of a new group of people that call themselves "The New Identity Movement"; these people know that they are the true descendants of the seeds of Abraham, but the controlling Jews have taken over our government and they go nuts when their "claimed position" is threatened. What the nebulous "they" did was that they sent in federal troops to make an example of this family. The fact that the root of the whole fiasco was over religious belief was never on the news, to my knowledge. Randy Weaver and his family were very outspoken about their beliefs and this was their downfall. Randy Weaver lost his wife Vicki and a son in this show of power over the people. The "Khazar-Jews" that are controlling our government have plans and will stop at nothing to wipe out the true seeds of Abraham. They have been in our government for sometime now and have written laws to protect themselves and laws such as the Emergency Executive Orders (as outlined in the chapter on F.E.M.A) to force the "chosen race" into concentration camps and kill them by what ever means they choose. Its the plan for another holy war. Another Inquisition i s the one being done from the Catholic Church, because they (Khazar-Jews) still control it too. They have been trying to wipe out the royal seed, the "chosen ones" for along time. The Khazar-Jews are also behind the Illuminati and all of their dastardly plans to control the world hand in hand with the Catholic Church, the "Great Scarlet Whore".


    ARE MOST JEWS DESCENDANT OF ABRAHAM OR THE KHAZARS?


    The greatest source of pride for Jews is their belief that they are the "blood descendants of Abraham". Out of that conviction has come not only "identity", but deep "confirmation" through the ages; the "confirmation" results from a deliberate re-structuring of history.


    Modern scholars have, however, begun to question whether all who consider themselves Jews are in fact Jews at all. There is mounting evidence that the great majority of Jews today (the Ashkenazim or Eastern European Jews) are not the offspring of Abraham, but descendants of the ancient Central European nation of Khazaria, converted to Judaism in 740 A.D.




    6

    Khazaria's conversion to a Judaism is unquestioned. What remains in doubt is what became of the roughly two million Khazarians in the centuries following conversion? Did they dissolve into the nations of Central Europe? Or did they remain relatively intact, migrating to such countries as Poland. Lithuania, and Russia, laying the foundation for the massive "Jewish" populations Eastern Europe the source of most Jews living in Russian and the United States today?


    To begin to unravel this question we will look at the Khazars in the Encyclopedia Judaica. the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, the Jewish Encyclopedia and the Encyclopedia Britannica. The Thirteenth Tribe, the exhaustively researched study of the Khazars by the eminent modern Jewish writer, Arthur Koestler, provides us not only with vital background information, but conclusions about the final destiny of the Khazars (which the encyclopedias omit). Who were the Khazars? Where had they come from?


    The country of the Khazars, a people of Turkish stock, occupied a strategic key position at the vital gateway between the Black Sea and the Caspian, where the great eastern powers of the period confronted each other. It acted as a buffer protecting Byzantium against invasions by the barbarian tribesmen of the northern steppes Bulgars, Magyars, Pechenegs. etc. and later the Vikings and the Russians. Of even more importance both from the point of view of Byzantine diplomacy and of European history, is the fact that the Khazar armies effectively blocked the Arab avalanche in its most devastating early stages, and thus prevented the Muslim conquest of Eastern Europe.


    The Khazars, according to the Encyclopedia Judaica, may have been the descendants of Attila the Hun. Like other Turkish peoples they manifested the strongest warlike traits yet were often gifted with commercial and artistic genius. At the peak of their prosperity and power they exacted tribute from no fewer than 30 nations of Central Europe over whom they held undisputed dominion.


    During the 8th century Khazaria found itself embarrassed. The other nations surrounding it were adopting to more advanced monotheistic religions of Byzantine Christianity or Islam, while Khazaria languished in the primitive superstitions of a nation of nomads and warriors. It was time for a new religion. In 740 A.D. the Khagan summoned representatives of Christianity, Islam and Judaism to his presence, each being provided with the opportunity to state its case; in the end Judaism was accepted as Khazaria's new religion, probably because it carried no obligation for military alliances, as did Byazantine Christianity and Islam.


    For over 400 years well into the 13th Century Judaism thrived as the state religion of several million Khazars. The Khazars, whose most educated guess as to who might be their founding father would have been Attila the Hun, came to believe they were descendants, not of the "Golden Horde," but of Abraham. The Khazars studied Hebrew, venerated the Talmud and Torah, yearned for the coming of Messiah, and actually hoped to soon retake Jerusalem from the Moslems and return to "the land of their forefathers."


    The Norsemen, or "Rus," (forefathers of modern Russians), gradually gained the upper hand while Khazaria declined. The Rus made an alliance with Khazaria's traditional ally, Byzantium, and together in 1016 A.D. they treacherously invaded and conquered Khazaria, bringing to an end the autonomy of one of the most powerful and strategic nations of the ancient world.


    In the following century the fabric of Khazarian life was further rent by invasions of the "Kumans," a wild, barbaric horde from the steppes of Asia. Yet, far worse was the full scale invasion in 1245 of the terrible Mongol hordes led by Genghis Khan. Before the terror of Genghis Khan, not only the Khazars, but most inhabitants of Central Europe fled to the west. Yet the Khazars. traditionally a nation of nomads, had been migrating west and northwest for centuries even before the earlier invasions of the Rus. By the time of the Mongols, Khazar communities were well established in Hungary and the Ukraine, in the Balkans. Southern Russia, in Slavic lands, in Lithuania, hut most of all, Poland.


    With the first awakenings of civilization in Poland, beginning with the founding go the first Piast dynasty in 926
    A.D., the Khazars, because of their commercial background as artisans, middlemen and traders, were especially welcome as settlers. It was not long before one Polish city contained five synagogues, while many towns had at least two. In fact, complaints began to come before the magistrates that Khazar synagogues, because of their height and opulence, were putting Christian edifices to shame. Legislation was demanded to limit them in size and


    7





    number. Even as late as the 15th and 16th centuries, Khazars continued to arrive and prosper in Poland, making
    Poland the "new Khazaria" to roughly a half million displaced Khazars.


    It was well into the 17th century before the racial isolation of the Khazar communities in Poland, Lithuania and Russia was significantly altered by contact with authentic descendants of Abraham form the West. During the Moslem conquests and after the Jewish exodus from Babylon in the 11t h century, most "true" Jews had settled in the lands surrounding the Mediterranean, especially Spain. Only relatively small numbers of such Jews inhabited Northern Europe. Despite claims by Jewish historians that mass migrations of authentic Jews moved east into Khazar territories as a result of such calamities as the Crusades, the Black Death and the Inquisition, Koestler thoroughly documents the absence of any historic basis for such alleged movements concerning genuine Jewish populations in the German Rhineland before and after the first Crusade.


    Ultimately, the first widespread contact between Khazars and Jews of the west occurred as a result of the anti- Semitic Chmelnicky massacres in Poland of 1648-49. A wave of Khazar migration began out of Poland to the west a migration which continued almost three centuries until the second World War. It is out of that migration, beginning mid-point in the 17th century, that the principle Jewish settlements of Europe, the United States and Israel have been formed.

  6. #6
    YIDDISH: THE LANGUAGE OF KHAZARS


    Curiously, a study of Yiddish, the language of the Polish Khazars, also confirms the absence of authentic Jewry in Poland before the mid-17th Century. Yiddish, of course, began as the Jewish "lingua franca" language of commerce. It combined Hebrew with the East-Middle German spoken by the German bourgeoisie class which dominated Polish culture during the period in which Yiddish was formed. The fact of the matter is that if authentic Jews had been in Poland in the time of Yiddish's evolution during and after the 15th Century, then words of the West German dialect spoken by Jews of the West would also be found in Yiddish. Yet, according to scholars, Yiddish is untainted by West German influence. In contrast to thousands of Hebrew, East German and Slavic words in Yiddish, there is not a West German word to be found proving that authentic Jews had no part in the cultural life which produced Yiddish.


    If Jews from the West had been unable to influence Yiddish which in the period of its formation was a linguistic "free-for-all" inviting the contributions of anyone, is it credible that they would have made any significant contribution to the gene-pool of the Polish Khazars? Hardly. It cannot be denied that from the day Khazaria was converted to Judaism Jews world-wide had been vaguely aware of a Jewish state to the East, and some may even have visited and intermarried. Yet such infinitesimal commingling of genuine Jewish blood in the veins of hundreds of thousands of Khazars would not have compared to the much more frequent inbreeding which must have inevitably occurred between the Khazars and the Hungarians. Russians and Poles who surrounded them.


    THE CRUEL HOAX


    We have the strongest evidence, then, from historic and linguistic sources, that the Ashkenazi-Khazarian population of Eastern Europe, (the source of most of the people that call themselves "Jews" but are not), if not
    100 percent Gentile before the mid-17th Century, were very near to it.


    For a very long time now, the elders of this group of so-called "Jews" have been telling the children to marry into the gentile people in order to soften or delete the facial features; this has been happening for a very long time in order to "infiltrate" the gentile without much notice of what they really are - controlling Khazars at heart. With this in mind, the Jewish claim that a l l of Eastern Europe contains at least some of the blood of Abraham becomes spurious; the crudest attempt to preserve the Askenazim from being as "Gentile" as the verdict of history decrees them to be. Rejecting history, Khazar-Jewish scholars scramble for even the smallest claim to the patrimony of Abraham, since it is essential not only to the "self-esteem" of Eastern European "Jewry," but to legitimize the present Jewish claim to Palestine - a claim which has been most insistently made by those of Khazar origin.


    The most any Eastern European "Jew" can claim with confidence is that his forefathers were converted to Judaism out of Paganism. The story of the Khazar Empire, as it slowly emerges from the past, begins to look like the most cruel hoax which history has ever perpetrated.



    10

    Yet if this black joke is on the Jews, it is almost as much on American fundamentalists. Most Jewish settlers in Palestine during the first half of this century were Ashkenazim. Yet Christians have defended them as "God's chosen people" hogwash, whose zeal in ex-propriating the native Palestinians they viewed as the laudable- predestined role of regaining the land promised to their fore fathers.


    The truth is, the majority of these Jews who pioneered Palestine, high-handedly expelling Arabs from their homes were no more the descendants of Abraham.


    While Christians have totally accepted the racial and territorial claims of the Ashkenazim, it is intriguing that most of their fellow Israelites, the Sephardic, and Oriental Jews, have not. In modern Israel there is a racial memory which persists a primal resentment of those aggressive, red-haired Jews from the north. In fact, antipathy between Ashkenazi and Sephardic-Oriental is so intense that it is an exception if they intermarry; racial slurs, discrimination, and even violence between them is increasingly common. Nevertheless, both Jews and U.S. Evangelicals are reluctant to accept the historic, racial basis from such aversion, preferring to believe all Jews are, by definition, the children of Abraham. What is the spiritual and prophetic significance of the inbreeding of the Khazars into the stem of Judah? Does it threaten the Biblical promise of God's ultimate restoration of the Jewish nation?


    Consider, for example, the Sephardic Jew the Jew most likely to inherit the actual genes of Abraham. Although we would like to believe he is untainted by Gentile admixture, again, the evidence suggests otherwise. Why is it that Jews living in Holland, Morocco, Italy or Turkey often resemble the inhabitants of their host country more than Jews living in other parts of the world? It is because, despite Rabbinic scriptures, Jews have intermarried with their host nations during the dispersion, just as they did in biblical times.


    During the past two thousand years, the beautiful daughters of Rebekah have been seduced or wooed by Gentile men. Jewish boys covet fair-haired, blue-eyed gentile girls. Today in America 40 percent of Jewish young men marry outside their race. Is this only a recent phenomena? Of course not. Intermarriage of such magnitude is indeed not unique to our time, but not the fact of intermarriage in Israel an indulgence by peasant or potentate from the beginning.


    THE ZIONIST EXPLANATION


    Just as there arc two different parts of Christianity, Catholic and Protestant, which have fought bitterly during the history of the world, there are likewise two parts of what is known as Judaism, the Orthodox Jewish Religion, and the Zionist Judaism by the Politics of Race. The Zionist Judaism today is not only made up of Kharzars/Jews but you will also find so-called Christians supporting their cause. Our government, Senate, House of Representative and Presidency is almost 100% Zionist/Kharzar. controlled that is why we are having some outrageous Zionist slanted laws pasted by these people that we have put in power with our vote of trust, so they could stab us in the back. This is how some people such as former President Wilson and the Rev. Jerry Falwell could claim to be both Zionists and Christians. That sounds l i k e a warped mine or double jeopardy.


    WHAT HAVE THE ZIONIST BEEN DOING


    In April, 1917, after being re-elected for a second term on the campaign slogan. "He dept. us out of war!", and after the agreement was made with Britain to set up political Zionist socialist democratic state. Wilson declared war on Germany. George Bush Campaigned on the theme, "Read my lips, no new taxes." He did all in his power to get all sorts of new taxes through Congress.


    In 1939 Admiral Sir Barry Domvile, Director of British Naval Intelligence during the pre-W.W.II era, and some of his associates, concluded that there was sufficient evidence to prove that the leaders of what he called World Jewry, and what we now identify as Political Zionism, were the "secret Power" behind the drive for a New World Order. They became convinced long before W.W.II that these Zionist were using their tremendous wealth to purchase sufficient power so as to influence international affairs in such a way as to bring nations into conflict with each other. These Zionists planned to establish a "Messianic Age" so that World Zionism with a central government in Palestine, could enforce their totalitarian ideology upon the entire world. To achieve their goals, they would control both Zionism and the leaders of Communism and Fascism (Hitler). They would control both Socialism and Corporate Capitalism through their control of international banking, oil and politics. Their intent
    11

    was to bring about a "One World Government" which they intended to control as they had controlled the former independent nations of the Soviet Union with their agent Lenin after October, 1917. It is through the wars generated from behind the scenes that the Zionists intend to establish what George Bush called the New World Order.


    It could never have been suspected that the concepts of Political Zionism would come to control the thrust of liberal as well as so-called fundamental Christianity. It is through this convert Zionist activity, that Christians are being deceived into believing that the New World Order to be set up in Jerusalem , is the will of God on the Earth. What garbage!


    They intend to use Christian ministries and their Zionist Political Action Committees to get our Senate and
    Congress, as well as all the Presidents, to adopt their objectives as their own.


    Zionist believe in the Jewish race (Kharzars) rather than the Jewish Religion. A far wiser generation than ours rejected the idea of abandoning American Sovereignty to a Zionist World Government.


    In spite of all the propaganda to the contrary over the past 50 years, there was never any intention on Hitler's part to attack and occupy the United States or make us a part of his Third Reich. Hitler did not want war with the United States and our country was under no threat, militarily or economically, from even a Nazi conquered Europe.


    The word Holocaust is not a German word at all it is Zionist-Yiddish and in Yiddish it means "a burnt sacrifice to a god." It is puzzling as to why what happened to the Jews in Hitler's Germany should be called a burned sacrifice to a god, knowing that there was no such intent on the part of Hitler to sacrifice these Jewish people to Almighty God. The Zionist Jews cooperated with Hitler's top people to deliberately annihilate the Orthodox Jews of Poland and Germany. The sacrifice of these orthodox religious Jews by the Zionist-Kharzars Jews was in literal fact a holocaust—a burnt sacrifice or offering to their god who ever that might be. my God does not require such hair-brain stuff, does yours?


    The European poor and uneducated Orthodox Jews were betrayed into Hitler's Concentration Camps by these Zionist-Kharzar (that call themselves Jews but are not). These Zionist-Kharzar, are now going back to Palestine after 1000 years, that are actually the ones who engineered what has become to be known as The Holocaust?


    The current high ranking Israeli Official, Rudolf Kastner, as being a collaborator with the Nazis and says that Zionist Kastner was directly responsible for the slaughter of one million Hungarian Orthodox Jews. Hitler's great Holocaust, to the extent that Jews were tortured, starved and murdered, was actually the elimination of the Orthodox Jews by the Zionist-Kharzar (which are not Jew) Jew. The Holocaust was just another Zionist operation.


    America's involvement in World War II had little to do with any threat against America, or any ego trip by Hitler and his National Socialists who needed to expand their agricultural land and economic base in order to sustain their failing socialist system. It had to do with providing the Zionists with land in Palestine form which the eventual New World Order would be directed.


    The Zionists needed a "holocaust" in order to finally get the world to justify giving them a national identity in
    Palestine from which to bring about their program of the New World Order.


    The majority of the Jews who died in Hitler's camps did so after being betrayed by the Zionist-Kharzars Jews which are not Jews in the United States Department of State. Roosevelt and Churchill knew what was going on. The next thing on the Zionist world agenda was the establishment of the United Nations which would then, as its first Official Act. declare that Palestine would belong to the Zionist Jews who wanted to migrate there. The Zionist did not care if it cost the lives of hundreds of thousands of Jews to bring it about? To quote a popular Zionist leader Rabbi Israel Miller:


    "I know that I don't have to say this, but in bringing everybody under the Zionist Banner, we never forget that our goals are the safety and security of Israel, foremost. Our goal will be realized in the Yiddishkeit, in a Jewish life being lived in every place in the word; our goals will have to be realized, not merely by what we impel others to

    12

    do. And here in this country it means frequently working through the President's Conference, or it might be in unison with other groups that feel as we do. But that too is part of what we think Zionism means and what our challenge is."


    How do you like the idea of bringing everybody under the Zionist Banner? Did you know that this is the goal of every Zionist from Henry Kissinger on down? How do you l i k e the idea of a Jewish life-style in every place in the world or being impelled by them to do what they want? I am not presenting you with the work of obscure Jewish radicals, but the caliber of men who influence Presidents and Congress. These are the Zionists who operate over
    100 Political Action Committees, and ultimately elect almost every U. S. Senator and a majority of the Congress. These are the Zionists who convince our President and your Congress that the safety and security of Israel is their foremost objective. To that end, they either borrow or tax Christian America to the tune of 4 billion per year just for Israeli foreign aid. How is the Zionist goal of the Judaization of the world being brought about? Quite simply. it is being done by Christian ministers, from the most well known TV evangelists down to the preacher in your home town who is a covert Zionist or who, through deliberate abysmal ignorance s t i l l thinks that the anti-Christ Zionist is one of God's Chosen People. They are really the active instigators for the Lucifer Rebellion for Jehovah.


    Are you beginning to see why it is vital for you to understand the various genealogies of the peoples of the earth in respect to what the Bible has to say about them? How are you going to understand the game if you cannot identify The Players? If you do not understand what little that is out lined in this book, how are you going to stand against sophisticated Zionist ministers who point you to glaringly obvious anti-Christ peoples and insist that they have a legal, historical, or theological right to the land of Palestine that they stole by force, and whose Ashkenaz (Khazar) forefather never owned in the first place?


    THE NEW WORLD ORDER WITH ITS CAPITAL IN JERUSALEM


    The Zionist New World Order has been designed to put all nations of the world under a system of world law. You heard President Bush mention this "world Law" in his recent speeches to the American people. This world law will be an "Admiralty Law" (which they have already instituted in this country, just about all common law is gone), under which our B i l l of Rights w ill be abolished. You will cease to be citizens of the united states of America, but persons, subjects, or individuals and treated in the same status and venue as those who are harassed by the Internal Revenue Service. Inc., which is a covert application of Admiralty Law under implied or actual contract that you volunteer your self into unknowingly.


    WHO HAVE SOME OF THE ZIONIST TRADERS BEEN?


    To start w ith go to your library and take down several biographies of FDR, and scan the names in the index. What do you see? Do you notice the disproportionally high percentage of Jewish names of those among his associates, advisors, and appointees? Why do you suppose they are in those positions? Is it because they are the brightest and most capable? Of course not! They are the sayanim, the volunteer Zionist helpers. Roosevelt liked to call them his "brain-trust." One of the most important books on FDR, is The Roosevelt Record, by Elizabeth Dillling published in 1939. Roosevelt knew what he was doing.


    You should also do some research into the background of Eleanor Roosevelt. There is a 45 year old Congressional Report on their investigation into un-American propaganda activities being carried on during the period just before and during W.W.II. It is three volumes with 2.166 pages in it. It is known as Appendix-Part IX and is a collector's item worth about S500. In this Congressional Report, it lists the names of subversive Americans, and the various Communist Front Groups that they belong to. Your Congress proved that she belonged to twenty different ones. Research intelligence data published since 1944 establish that Eleanor was a member of at least
    100 such groups during the tree terms that FDR was President. She an intimate associate of the founders of the Communist Party in the Unite States almost form the beginning! She was furious with the exposure of her communist activities, and had the Chief Investigator for the House Committee on Un-American Activities. Mr. Robert Stripling, drafted into the Army when he was qualified to be exempt. One of Eleanor Roosevelt's close associates and confidants was a Mrs. Royale Davis of Chicago in those days. Mrs. Davis was the mother of Nancy Davis Reagan. Ronald Reagan, the synthetic conservative of today, was a supporter of Roosevelt's so-called New Deal. The "great communicator" was a long-time President of the cited subversive Screen Actors Guild. Hence if you will examine those appointees, associates, and State Department employees of the Reagan Administration, you will find those hidden Zionists, the Jews of the 5th column helping in Israel's goal of a New World Order.

    1 3

    Some Americans are aware that the major Zionist prize to come out of the WWII, was the United Nations. Thus the Zionists were one step closer to the New World Order spoken so highly of by President Bush in the past few months. Not known to most Americans is the second greatest prize of World War II. the oil rich fields of the Middle East, especially Saudi Arabia. It was supposed in the years before WWII, that whoever controlled that area, would control the world oil, and hence the world. We have come full circle, for President Roosevelt's last world conference was in Iran's city of Teheran. He met there with Churchill and Stalin in November 1943. The itinerary of this meeting was the agreements between them regarding the division of the world right in the middle of the greatest oil fields known in those days. The whole region, we now call the Middle East, that is the area from the Red Sea, the Black Sea, the Caspian Sea, the Mediterranean Sea and the Persian Gulf is one vast oil basin. Of course, today the largest oil field is on the Alaskan North slope, and there is enough oil there to supply America's needs for a thousand years at present and anticipated consumption.


    America has no need whatever for Middle East oil today, and in fact there is enough oil in Alaska to make America the richest and mo st powerful nation in the world. That, however, is not in the plans for those who want to set the New World Order in place.


    IT IS TIME FOR THE COMMON AMERICAN TO GET UPSET AND INVOLVED


    Why are you sitting there idle? Why aren't you jumping up and down in the streets? Why aren't you talking to everyone you meet, not only to preserve our nation and our way of life, but at least making an effort to save the thousands of American servicemen who have no idea these days that they are being deliberately sacrificed in battles for the Glory of Israel and the New World Order? All wars in this world are holy wars there are really no enemies, except the Zionist-Kharzar-Jews to the common people. If they were not here on earth creating trouble between notions the people of earth would live in peace.

  7. #7
    ENGLAND, FRANCE AND THE HOLY GRAIL






    King Arthur was a misty figure of myth and legend, recent archaeological investigations at traditional Arthur sites have revealed what is now call "Arthurian Fact". A powerful Romano-British war lord did apparently reside atop Cadbury Hill, the traditional site of Camelot. Cadbury H ill was the center of an anti-Saxon defensive network in southwest England.


    King Arthur is also associated in myth and legend with an early Christian community in southwest England, and with something called "The Holy Grail." There was found to be support for an early Christian community at Glastonbury, and even some evidence of a plausible "Holy Grail" as a religious treasure guarded originally by Joseph of Arimathaea.


    Arthur perished at the Battle of Camlann and was buried in Avalon. He handed over his command to
    Constantine, but the Saxon dark clouds closed over him and the spark of civilization that was Camelot.


    Then we jump 500 odd years to the year 1099 A.D. when Godfroi de Bouillon emerged from relative obscurity in southern France to become King of Jerusalem. His place of origin, the Pyrenees and the regions of Languedoc and Province, was unique in all of Christendom. The civilization there was relatively advanced. It was wealthy. It wasn't quite Christian. The knight-poets of the area, the troubadours, created a literature based, of all things, on King Arthur and the Holy Grail. Although a favorite troubadour is Wolfram von Eschemback. who was Bavarian and might better be called by the proper German term minnesinger. The great majority of troubadours who wrote and sang Grail Romances were French, from the regions of Province and Languedoc. The best known are Chretien de Troyes. who wrote the first known Grail Romance, and Robert de Boron. There were many others, mostly all French.


    De Bouillon's dynasty created the Knights Templar, and this order of chivalry was woven into the Grail Romances. They were portrayed as guardians of the Grail, as Arthur had been. The Templars immediately gained great prestige, and wealth to match.


    There is a thread of connection. But what of the 500 odd year gap separating King Arthur from Godfroi de
    Bouillon?


    Obviously, de Bouillon's troubadours conceived a connection between King Arthur and southern France. Thai mysterious object, the Holy Grail, links Arthur with the de Bouillon's and the Templars.


    The modern French village of Rennes-le-Chateau nestles in the eastern foothills of the Pyrenees near the confluence of the Aude. Blanque and Sale rivers. It is only about 2 kilometers, a bit more than a mile, from the larger town of Blanchefort. This larger town was in the past the family seat of Bertrand de Blachefort, a Grand Master of the Knights Templar.


    Naturally, because of all the traditional stories about Templar treasure, local legends have hinted that something of great worth had long been hidden near the village of Rennes-le-Chateau and the town of Blanchefort.


    After all the centuries, it appears that something was found after all.


    In 1891, the obscure and impoverished village priest of Rennes-le-Chateau. Berenger Sauniere. began the job of making repairs and renovations to his village church. He discovered that his church had been built on the foundations of an older medieval one. Most of this older structure had been destroyed, but the altar-stone remained. It was supported by two pillars. One of these columns proved to be hollow.


    Inside the hollow pillar Cure Sauniere found four pieces of parchment. Two pages were genealogies. Two others were a long and complicated message in code.




    15

    The genealogies dated from 1244 and 1644. The first date is significant. It is the year that the last Cathar stronghold, Montsegur, surrendered and when the remnants of the Cathars and de Bouillon's descendants and relatives went into hiding.


    The two pages of code had been written in the late 1700's by a former village priest of Rennes-le-Chateau. This priest was also the personal confessor to the Blanchefort family. This coded message has exercised the imaginations of a number of French investigators. Some of it has apparently been deciphered, but even 50 the text does not always make much sense.


    Shepherds, no temptation. That Poussin, Teniers, hold the key; Peace 681. By the Cross and this Morse of God. I complete or destroy this demon of the Guardian at noon. Blue apples.


    Another passage reads:


    To Dagobert II, King, and to Sion belongs this treasure and he is there dead.


    The mention of Dagobert II is important and ties in with the two pages of genealogies found along with the message. These genealogies preserved the lineage of Dagobert II through his son. Sigisbert IV, up to Godfroi de Bouillon and on into the 1700's.


    The significance of the coded message and the genealogies, Berenger Sauniere was able to make some sense of them. What he learned, and what he leaked out to the world, changed his life in a number of ways. Sauniere immediately took the documents to his superior, the bishop of Carassonne. Then the bishop just as quickly instructed him to take the documents to Abbe Bieil, Director General of the Seminary of Saint-Supice in Paris.


    After his visit to Paris. Sauniere returned to Rennes-le-Chateau. but he returned as an amazingly changed man. This formerly impoverished village priest began to acquire or at least to spend vast sums of money. He spent it in peculiar ways.


    He built a small medieval replica castle in which to house his rapidly expanding library of books. He called it the "Tour Magdala", the Tower of the Magdalene.


    Then he built himself a large country manor which he called V illa Bethania in honor of Mary of Bethany.


    It has been estimated that Suniere spent several million dollars between 1891 and 1917. Not all of it was spent on private libraries and manors. He paid for the building of a modern road to Rennes-le-Chateau. and he supplied his village with a running water system.


    His faith underwent a transformation along with his finances. It changed from orthodox Catholicism to some other belief which, though just as strong perhaps, he kept hidden for the rest of his life. He continued with the restoration of the village church which had been interrupted by his discoveries and his Parisian visit, but he restored the church strangely. Over the new door he placed this inscription in Latin:


    Terribilis est Locus Iste


    It means: "This place is terrible".


    Inside the church he placed a statue of the demon Asmodeu - "custodian of secrete, guardian of hidden treasures and according to ancient Judaic legend, the builder of Solomon's Temple."


    Sauniere's social life changed. Along with his inexplicable wealth, he acquired the friendship of Archduke Johann von Hapsburg (cousin of the Austrian Emperor. Franz-Joseph), of the French Secretary of State. He also apparently acquired a mistress. Marie Denarnaud, who inherited all of Sauniere's wealth and properties. She also claimed to know his secret.




    16

    Marie Denarnaud died on January 29, 1953. She announced that she would reveal Sauniere's secret on her deathbed, but she suffered a sudden stroke, lay in a near-coma for 10 days before her death, incapable of speech, and the secret died with her.


    The strange life of Berenger Sauniere and the odd church and Tour Magdala at Rennes-le-chateau piqued the curiosity of a number of French investigators during the 1950s. It soon became clear that someone had deposited a series of bewildering and tantalizing documents in these libraries, but most particularly in the Bibliotheque Nationale where they were certain to be stumbled upon by serious researchers. Most of these documents had to do with Godfroi de Bouillon, the Merovingians, Cathars. Templars or with the troubadours. These documents included genealogies, squibs of historical observation, clippings from obscure publications, and long dissertations about Cathar religion. Invariably, although they were deposited in the Bibliotheque Nationale, and sometimes recently during the 1950s, their origin was a mystery.


    All were vaguely relevant to the "de Bouillon dynasty", none made much sense individually, but taken together they told, and fleshed out, a remarkable story. It slowly dawned upon the researchers that someone was way ahead of them. Someone knew the secret about Rennes-le-Chateau and had left a series of clues for researchers to discover, and it did not take too long before everyone began to realize that just a mere "someone" could not have deposited all of these documents. The mass of material was both too great and too varied to be attributed to any one individual. Then, how had so many documents been accepted by the Bibliotheque Nationale without proper author-publisher data? How had such documents been so speedily transferred onto microfiche minus the standard catalogue data?


    The only possible answer seemed to be a well-organized and well-funded secret society with high-level contacts in the French ministry of culture. It was quite obvious that this secret society wanted the story of Rennes-le-Chateau to come out and was leading the researchers by a cat-and-mouse game of coy and carefully-timed revelations to get the story out. In the beginning, soon after Marie Denarnaud's death, most of the curious journalists and writers had been content to assume that Sauniere's wealth had somehow derived from some sort of very tangible treasure that he'd found, probably a hoard of Templar gold and silver.


    But it gradually became clear that the treasure was some sort of secret information, not metallic wealth, and that this secret knowledge concerned nothing less than the essence of Western history. The Dossiers secrets gradually led investigators to a reconstruction of a fantastic underground history, and led them according to a time-table. Whatever the organization was behind it all, it wanted the story told, but wanted the information released over a number of years. It seemed that the researchers, and the general public, were being prepared for some momentous future revelation by increasing exposure to "mini-revelations" that were more digestible.


    It started becoming apparent that the Cathars and Albigensians possessed some secret truth or doctrine that amounted to a human treasure. And that, somehow, Godfroi de Bouillon's bloodline was this treasure, incarnate, and had been guarded by the Templars. Various objects called collectively the "Holy Grail" provided proof absolute of this lineage's extraordinary origin and worth. This proof, likewise, had been guarded by the Templars. Contact with this secret truth was restricted to a chosen few. But once they did come into contact with it, and once the proofs of it were seen, they could never again accept orthodox religion whether Roman Christian. Judaism or Islam. The secret was something that transcended all of these "truths".


    At least one small part of the great secret, but by no means all of it, has been disclosed by several French investigators. It is simple, Jesus had apparently been married to Mary Magdalene, they had children, and these children married into the bloodline that resulted in Godfroi de Bouillon.


    The legacy of Jesus had not ended on the cross. The descendants and Jesus both survived after his Crucifixion, to form a "Holy" bloodline. That has merged into the lineage of the first kings of France, the so- called Merovingian Dynasty. Godfroi de Bouillon was a Merovingian. Jesus ascended into a higher frequency and understanding and s t i l l lives today in another plane of reality. Refer to chapter "The Apotheosis Project".


    The mystery of Rennes-le-Chateau. Sauiere had found proof of this divine lineage among the genealogies. It threatened Christian dogma and orthodoxy, and placed the Roman Catholic Church ( t h e Scarlet Whore) in the position of being the oppressor of Christ's descendants and the destroyer of the truth that Jesus taught and the

    17

    Catholic Churches attempted annihilation of his descendants the Israelites. In short the Christian religion is a fabrication and an enslaver of the people because they have been deprived the truth. This is the way one small group can control ignorant humans. Sauniere had obtained his wealth by blackmailing the Vatican. Sauniere had tapped into the real power of the de Bouillon bloodline, a power that no longer seemed so mysterious. Because of h i s discovery. Berenger Sauniere just accidentally became initiated into the secrets that was ordinarily revealed only to a relative few. He also tapped into the underground of secret societies which replaced the Knights Templar. His faith was transformed, he acquired instant wealth, and he acquired friends and enemies in high places.


    If the Merovingian lineage was really related to Jesus, but there remained the tantalizing suggestion that the de Bouillon bloodline had not been exterminated by the Inquisition as the church had planned to do. The lineage had apparently survived the Albigensian Crusade, the fall of Montsegur and the destruction of the Knights Templar. One of the genealogies that Sauniere found traced the de Bouillon lin e up to 1644, or 400 years exactly after the surrender of Montsegur. The "Holy" Merovingian lineage had survived. The Dossiers secrets leaked hints that it had survived until today and was busy molding Western history behind the scenes.


    Who were these Merovingians? Maybe more important, what were they? Godfroi de Bouillon's "Holy" lineage did not depend only upon intermarriage with the descendants of Jesus. Jesus was only a part of the divine claim, one episode in a very long history.


    What might be called "establishment history" can easily tell us what the Merovingians were, at least, on the surface. They were the Sicambrian Franks, a somewhat mixed Celtic-Teutonic tribe that during most of the Roman Empire had lived east of the Rhine in present-day Germany. They were far from being savages, although they were pagans. They had long been in contact with Rome, some of the leaders had adopted Roman dress. Some had become Roman citizens, and there were even Sicambrian consuls in the history of the Roman Empire. Many of the Franks served in the Imperial Army.


    When Roman power began to collapse during the late 300's and early 400's A.D.. these Sicambrians moved westward across the Rhine and occupied Roman Gaul. This was not a "barbarian invasion" such as the Angles. Saxons and Jutes were launching from further north, for the Sicambrina Franks were not barbarians. They moved into the Roman power vacuum and filled it. This was just before the time of Arthur in Britain. When the Sicambrian Franks reached the Channel about 400 A.D., they probably established contact with the Romano-Britons in the generation of Ambrosius and Uther Pendragon. In fact, archeology proves this to be the case. Shards of Mediterranean wine amphorae have been recovered from most Arthurian sites, including Tintagel. the traditional place of Arthur's birth. Excavation has demonstrated a lively trade across the Channel between Somerset-Cornwall and Brittany in the 5th Century. It was trade between the "Arthurians" and the Sicambrian Franks.


    An alliance between the two peoples was almost inevitable. They played the same role. While the "Arthurians" preserved what was left of Roman civilization in Britain, the Sicambrian Franks did the same thing in Gaul.


    One Sicambrian King was named Merovee. About 470 A.D. something noteworthy happened during Merovee's rule. The Sicambrian l i n e was somehow enhanced in prestige from this time. The dynasty was called Merovingian afterwards in honor of this King Merovee who reigned about the time of King Arthur's birth.


    The Sicambrian Franks, or Merovingians, were peculiar in several respects. Not the least of their peculiarities was that they claimed to be Jewish! They claimed to represent the majority of the Tribe of Benjamin!


    The tribe of Benjamin was one of the Twelve Tribes of Israel and was in some way special. This tribe was also powerful. God was somehow in the Tribe of Benjamin. In Deuteronomy 33, Moses says of the Tribe of Benjamin: "The beloved of the Lord shall dwell in safety by him; and the Lord shall cover him all the day long, and he shall dwell between his shoulders."








    18

  8. #8
    The Tribe of Benjamin held the land that included Jerusalem, as in spelled out in Joshua 18: "Zelah, Eleph and Jebusi. which is Jerusalem, Gibeath and Kirjath; fourteen cities with their villages. This is the inheritance of the children of Benjamin according to their families."


    But it came to pass that most of the Benjamites left Palestine, and this was because of a civil war among the Israelites. The Tribe of Benjamin came into conflict with the other eleven Tribes because the Benjamites were apparently allied with the "Sons of Belial" and would not attempt to impose Israelite laws and customs upon them. This war is covered in Judges 21 in the Bible. The result was that most of the Benjamites left Palestine, or were expelled by the victorious eleven Tribes.


    The "Sons of Belial" with whom the Benjamites were allied, or against whom they refused to go to war in order to enforce Israelite customs, were none other than the Phoenicians of Tyre and Sidon, the "red headed" ones who were "proto-Celts". It is possible that the Benjamites were related to these coastal people. They certainly had some affinity with them, and refused to go to war against them.


    At the same time, the Benjamites had a very great holding in Palestine, a tract including the major Israelite cities and Jerusalem. The mere fact that they were able to consider a war against all the other Tribes must mean that the Tribe called the Benjamites must have been the most powerful single tribe in the Israelite confederacy as well as being somehow "different."


    The Old Testament has been doctored to reflect the cohesion and greatness of the Hebrews, just as the New
    Testament has been doctored to distort certain embarrassing relationships.


    The Tribe of Benjamin, which had some special divine dispensation and significant geographical holdings, may not have been within the "Semitic mainstream" at all. They may have had closer genetic relationship to the "Sons of Belial" whom they refused to fight. If so, the later editors of the Old Testament could not allow this to come out. The most special Hebrew tribe, and the most powerful one. was not descended from Abraham at all? Was not a part of the Hebrew mainstream that would later become "Jewish"?


    Whatever the truth of such speculations, the Benjamites seem to have been virtually exterminated in the war. The majority of the survivors took ship for Greece. Only a few stayed behind. This emigratio is itself a powerful argument that the Benjamites and the coastal Phoenicians must have had close relations. The Israelites were inland herdsmen, not seamen. The refugee Benjamites must have sailed to Greece on Phoenician ships. But why wouldn't the Phoenician just have enslaved the remnants of a defeated inland tribe? Why should the Phoenicians have carried them to safety instead?


    The answer can only be a close and sympathetic affinity between the Benjamites and the Phoenicians, and very probably a blood-relationship.


    At any rate, the Benjamites arrived in Greece, in a region called Arcadia. It was their refuge for some generations. Then, they joined the general westward migrations of people in Europe. They followed the major rivers westward, like the Danube, and finally ended up along the Rhine at the close of the Roman Empire. They moved west across the Rhine when Roman power finally crumbled and reached Brittany and the English Channel.


    And there, of course, they came into contact with people who had also, long before, been partly Phoenician/Carthagenian themselves. People who had undertaken an even longer migration westward by sea. People who were, in a way, long-lost relations, and they became allies. Aside from the matter of a distant Middle Eastern kinship, the Romano-British Celts and the Sicambrian Franks faced the same military foes.


    The Sicambrian Franks, or Merovingians, did not forget their past Jewish history as the Tribe of Benjamin. Merovingian geographical place-names and personal names were sometimes Jewish. In the 6th Century a brother of King Clothair II was named Samson, while Miron "LeLevite" was a count. "Sion" and "Levi" were Merovingian towns in France. Scholars have even traced Merovingian "Salic Law" back to Judaic law. There was a very great "Jewish" component among the Sicambrian Franks/Merovingians and, because they practiced polygamy (another Medrovingian peculiarity) they left a great number of offspring. These aristocratic Merovingian children married into almost all the noble families of Europe during the 5th, 6th and 7th

    19

    Centuries. This has prompted more than one historian to suggest that the foundation of European nobility is
    Jewish. (Israelite).


    In addition to being "Jewish", or partly so, the Merovingians claimed an ancient descent from God. This is even hinted in the Biblical allotments to Benjamin, as already quoted. In token of this descent, the Merovingians were believed to bear some physical mark, though different writers disagree on what this was. But most believe it was some sort of red cross like birthmark, either on the chest or on the back. In any case, a red cross "pattee" became the Templar insignia.


    Several symbols were associated with the Merovingians. They brought the fleur-de-lis into France where it became associated, off and on, with the French state and with French royalty. The present flag of the Canadian province of Quebec has four fleur-de-lis separated by a white cross, this symbol is a stylized lily and there is evidence that it was originally a Jewish symbol. Not only are lilies frequently mentioned in the songs of David, but Jewish coins depicted lilies that look very much l i k e fleur-de-lis.


    The Merovingians are also associated with bees and, of all things, with toads. Clovis was the most famous Merovingian king. His father was Childeric I. In Childeric's grave were found 300 small gold bee figures. What these bees symbolized is not known, but it is known that Napolean appropriated them for his imperial robe when he crowned himself Emperor of the Franks in 1804.


    Clovis himself merged the symbolism of fleur-de-lis and toads. In a tapestry that was once in Reims cathedral but which has now been removed to the Reims museum. Clovis is shown wearing a yellow surcoat decorated with three toads. At Orleans a bas-relief showing a battle between French and Germans has the French represented by two flags: one flag with three toads, the other with three fleur-de-lis.


    A lot more could be written about curious things attached to the Merovingian lore, but enough has been given so that some sense can be made of a note found by researchers among the Dossiers secrets:


    One day the descendants of Benjamin left their county; certain remained; two thousand years later Godfroi VI (De Bouillon) became king of Jerusalem and founded the order of Sion.


    This is typical of a lot of the material on the Dossiers secrets and it would at First seem to connect two totally unrelated matters, the Tribe of Benjamin and a rather obscure 11th Century French nobleman, and to connect them in a nonsensical way.


    At the end of the 400s A.D. the Roman empire was crumbling in the west. The Christian church represented what was left of civilized knowledge, administrative know how and literacy. But the Church was a spiritual power, not a military one. To a greater or lesser extent at many different times, the Church was threatened with utter extinction by influxes of pagan barbarians. To survive, the Church sought out some cohesive military and social structure with which it could ally itself. The Merovingian kingships in Gaul were that power, the heirs of Rome. Although they were pagans, they were at least semi-civilized ones. To some degree they appreciated civilization and the Church's role in preserving what was left of it. That being so. they could be converted. And the Church set out to do just that.


    Clovis was the Merovingian king who became converted to Christianity. The kingdom of the Franks became convened with him. Clovis ruled between 481 and 511 A.D. and was thus probably a contemporary of King Arthur. He was baptized in 4% A.D. by St. Remy. This baptism was considered to mark the birth of a new and reconstituted kind of Roman Empire, a sort of "Christian Roman Empire" in which the Church would have spiritual control and much administrative influence, and in which Clovis and the Merovingians would have military and secular responsibilities. In theory, this was to be a perpetual pact between the Church and the Merovingians.


    It lasted, in name, for about 300 years. The problem was that, after Clovis. the Merovingian monarchies seemed to decline in v i t a l i t y and in competence. With rare exceptions, they didn't prove to be the bold warriors that the Church so urgently needed. The last Merovingians were called "enfeebled kings", and they were. Real power passed from the kings to the Mayors of the Palace, the ancestors of Charlemagne.



    20

    The enfeebled Merovingian kings were a definite liability for the Church and for European civilization. Very vital Islamic armies invaded Spain and threatened to pour over the Pyrenees into France itself. In this desperate situation, the Church turned more and more to the Mayors of the Palace and ignored the Merovingian kings, it was Charles Martel, not the Merovingian monarch, who won the Battle of Poitiers in
    732 A.D. and stopped the Moorish invasion of France. In 754 A.D. his son, Pepin III, was anointed King of the Franks, and established the Carolingian dynasty which replaced the enfeebled Merovingian one in the eyes of Rome. In the year 800 A.D., Charles the Great, Charlemagne, was crowned as Holy Roman Emperor, and the Church had broken its "perpetual pact" with Clovis and the Merovingian lineage.


    Meantime, steps had been taken to dispose of the Merovingian kings and potential heirs. The last real Merovingian ruler, Dagobert I I , was assassinated by a Carolingian Mayor of the Palace. It was thought that Dagobert's son and heir, Sigisbert IV, had died as well.


    But it seems that the young boy was taken to safety in the south of France to liv e among his mother's noble family, and Counts of Razes.


    Briefly, and leaving out unsuccessful attempts to re-establish the Merovingian kingship, various exiles and banishment's and some close calls evading the Moors, this lineage survived and prospered in the foothills of the Pyrenees. It multiplied and inter-married with other noble houses in France, England and Scotland. But the secret of Merovingian decent was not revealed to everyone.


    Eventually, this bloodline culminated in Godfroi De Bouillon and the Kingship Jerusalem.


    The "power center" of the bloodline was southern France, even though it established branches in many places. The family seat of the Counts of Razes was called Rhedae in the early middle ages. It later became known as Rennes-le-Chateau. Where Berenger Sauniere found the hidden genealogies that changed his life.


    The Merovingians had always claimed a divine origin, or, at least, had always claimed a supernatural one because of this "sea-beast" who was an ancient ancestor.


    But in the early "Dark Ages", this claim to "divinity" became much more immediately relevant to the people of the times, and especially to the Church.


    We will recall that something noteworthy happened during the reign of Merovee which justified some sort of
    "new reckoning" and a new dynastic name for the line of Sicambrian kings.


    Researchers led by clues have concluded that an infusion of "Holy Blood" occurred during the rule of Merovee, and infusion of blood from the lineage of Jesus himself. It was this that justified a new dynastic name and it was this that gave the Merovingian kingship such enormous prestige among those who knew of it. It was secret knowledge reserved for those who reached very high positions in Church and State, and it was the reason for the Church's perpetual pact with Clovis, which was betrayed by Rome.


    The Church's subsequent energetic attempts to destroy this bloodline, and to deny that it ever existed, were motivated by guilt over the broken pact and motivated by fear of popular reaction if people ever learned the truth. Then, too, the Church itself was gradually transforming its character, l i k e any other bureaucratic organization. The bishop of Rome, who had once been no more powerful than any other bishop, was attempting to assert spiritual authority over all of Christendom. The bishop of Rome was, in fact, slowly becoming the Pope and a complicated spiritual dogma was being created to justify this process. The existence of any flesh and blood descendants of Jesus the Christ would undermine Papal authority. Like any other large and powerful bureaucracy, the Papacy fought for its survival.


    But...were there any descendants of Jesus?


    This is such a shocking question for most modern Christians that it will have to be dealt with at some length, and in easy stages. It is first easier to ask if Jesus was married.




    21

    The Bible never explicitly commits itself as to the marital status of Jesus, but there is a lot of circumstantial evidence that Jesus must have been married. First of all, marriage was very much an expected role for any Jewish male of Jesus' time. It was an absolutely necessary condition for being a Rabbi ("teacher"). "The Jewish Mishnaic Law is quite explicit on the subject: 'An unmarried man may not be a teacher'". Charles Davis, " a respected contemporary theological scholar", says:


    Granted the cultural background as witnessed it is highly improbable that Jesus was not married well before the beginning of h i s public ministry. If he had insisted upon celibacy, it would have caused a stir, a reaction which would have left some trace. So. the lack of mention of Jesus's marriage in the Gospels is a strong statement not against, but for the hypothesis of marriage, because any practice of advocacy of voluntary celibacy would in the Jewish context of the time have been so unusual as to have attracted much comment and attention.


    The Gospel of John does, in fact, describe a marriage early in Jesus' ministry and it is apparently Jesus' own. It is the wedding at Cana. Inexplicably, somehow the mother of Jesus is also present at this wedding and she tells him to replenish the wine. This would be the function of a hostess. This is the well-known miracle when Jesus changed the water into wine. Neither Jesus nor Mary seem to be mere guests. "There is further evidence that the wedding at Cana is in fact Jesus' own. Immediately after the miracle has been performed, the
    'governor of the feast' a kind of major-domo or master of ceremonies tastes the newly produced wine ............................called
    the bridegroom, and saith unto him. every man at the beginning doth set forth good wine; and when men have well drunk, then that which is worse: but thou has kept the good wine until now.' For those who want to check
    the Gospels, the relevant passage is John 2:9-10.


    There are really too many Mary's in the life of Jesus. In addition to the Virgin Mary, h i s mother, Mary from Magdala, Mary "Magdalen", and Mary of Bethany, the sister of Martha and Lazarus. there are also

    Both Mary Magdalene and Mary of Bethany seem to be related to Jesus closely, but in strange
    Gospels (Mark and Matthew) the Magdalene isn't mentioned until late in the accounts, while
    ways. In in Luke
    two she
    features early when Jesus is still preaching in Galilee... and she apparently accompanies him to Judea. "This in
    itself strongly suggests that she was married to someone. In the Palestine of Jesus' time it would have been unthinkable for an unmarried woman to have traveled unaccompanied and, even more so. to travel unaccompanied with a religious leader and in his entourage her special relationship with Jesus and her proximity to him would have rendered both of them subject to suspicions, if not charges of adultery.


    What was this special relationship? It is never quite spelled out in the Gospels. But. First of all, it was to Mary Magdalene that Jesus first reveals his Resurrection, and she is present at all of the significant events of Jesus' adult ministry. The unnamed woman who anoints Jesus has always been associated with Mary Magdalene. If
    this is so, then Mary Magdalene is revealed as a woman of means because the cost of the anointing ointment is
    stressed. "Throughout the Gospels Jesus treats the Magdalene in a unique well have induced jealousy in the other disciples." and preferential manner.. which may


    Mary of Bethany was also a woman of means. Apparently Jesus and his entire entourage stayed at the home of Martha, Lazarus and Mary toward the final days. In Luke (10:38-42) there's a reference that would seem to indicate that Jesus is the husband of Mary. Mary's sister, Martha, complains:


    Now it came to pass, as they went, that he entered into a certain village: and a certain woman named Martha received h i m into her house.


    And she had a sister called Mary, which also sat at Jesus' feet and heard the word.


    But Martha was cumbered much about serving, and came to him. and said. Lord, dost thou not care that my sister hath left me to serve alone? Bid here therefore that she help me.


    And Jesus answered and said unto her. Martha, Martha, thou art careful and troubled about many things:




    22

    But one thing is needful: and Mary hath chosen that good part, which shall not be taken away from her.


    Apparently, then, Jesus could bid Mary to help Martha, as a husband but does not.


    There is a similar suggestion in the Gospel of John that Jesus is married to this Mary of Bethany. When Jesus arrives in Bethany, Lazarus is thought to be dead and Martha rushes out of the house to tell him hut Mary does not come out with her. Why not? Because, in the Jewish custom, she would have been sitting Shiveh (mourning) for Lazarus and by Judaic law of the time a woman sitting Shiveh could not leave the house except at the bidding of her husband.


    Jesus could not have been married to two women at once. He could not have been married to Mary
    Magdalene and Mary of Bethany at the same time.


    But there is a possibility that these two women with the same name, and with apparent wealth, were the same person. There is a direct inference of this in John 12:1-3:
    Then Jesus six days before the Passover came to Bethany where Lazarus was which had been dead, whom he raised from the dead. There they made him supper; and Martha served: but Lazarus was one of them that sat at the table with him. Then took Mary a pound of ointment of spikenardvery costly, and anointed the feet of Jesus, and wiped his feet with her hair; and the house was filled with
    the odor of the ointment.


    This Mary who anoints Jesus is clearly intended to be Martha's sister, Mary of Bethany, yet Mary Magdalene is also associated with the anointing of Jesus.


    Both of these Mary's are devoted disciples. Yet. in three Gospels Mary Magdalene is listed among those present at the Crucifixion while in the same three Gospels Mary of Bethany is not mentioned as being there. But surely such a devoted disciple would have been there. The perplexity is resolved if Mary Magdalene and Mary of Bethany are the same person. Both were there, in the same person.


    Could these women who. in the Gospels, appear in three different contexts in fact be a single person? The medieval Church certainly regarded them as such, and so did popular tradition. Many Biblical scholars today concur.


    There is. then, evidence that Jesus was married. And that he was married to Mary (Magdalene) and Mary (of
    Bethany) who were the same person.


    Biblical geography gives support to this. Cana, where the wedding took place, is only a few miles from
    Magdala which was Mary Magdalene's home town. Both Cana and Magdala are in Galilee, and are
    neighboring places. After this wedding. Mary Magdalene joins Jesus' entourage and travels with him to Judea.
    Was Mary's family so wealthy that it boasted two residences, one in Magdala and a town house in a wealthy suburb of Jerusalem? Apparently. And this supposition will lead to interesting speculations.


    It appears that the role and importance of Mary have been distorted by later editors of the New Testament. And confused. The profusion of Mary's appears to have been a way of disguising the fact that Jesus had a very special relationship with "Mary" which aroused the jealousy of the male disciples and which threatened the "patriarchal" orientation of the later Church. The male disciples' discomfort with Mary comes out often enough in the Gospels and doesn't need to be stressed here. It is well known and was even used as a major theme in the musical Jesus Christ Superstar


    Mary is also believed to have been a Benjamite. In subsequent legends, it is said that she was of royal lineage.


    A marriage between Jesus and Mary would, if Mary had been a Royal Benjamite, have been of very great dynastic importance.







    23

  9. #9
    Israel's first king, Saul, was a Bcnjamite. David, of the Tribe of Judah, not only deposed Saul but also appropriated his capital of Jerusalem. David therefore deprived the Benjamites of the kingship and of their major city. A dynastic marriage between a descendant of David's royal line and a descendant of Saul's would not only reconcile the Jewish kingship but establish a double claim to it. It becomes understandable, in this context, that Mary, if she was a royal Benjamite descendant, could undertake the anointing of Jesus it was a ritual reconciliation, a passing of the usurped kingship to her husband.


    If they were married, it is likely that they had children. If the marriage were, in fact, a dynastic alliance, children would have become a responsibility. Rabbis were expected to have children.


    There are strong traditions that Mary Magdalene fled to southern France immediately after the Crucifixion. "As early as the fourth century legends describe the Magdalene fleeing the Holy Land and being set ashore near Marseilles where, for the matter, her purported relics are s t i l l venerated. According to medieval legends, she carried with her the Marseilles the Holy Grail."


    Not far from Marseilles is the shrine of "Les Saintes Maries" where these relics supposedly reside. Gypsy rumors and pilgrimages support the other popular traditions. Katherine Esty writes in The Gypsies, Wanders in Time:


    Pilgrimage are nothing new to the Gypsies, of course. For the last seventy-five years, though, the Gypsy- pilgrimage has been to Les Saintes Marie's. There is a widely known Gypsy legend which explains both the name of the village and why it is a pilgrimage spot. According to legend, after the death of Jesus, the Jews gathered together all those closest to Jesus, forced them into a small boat without oars, sails, food or water and pushed them out to sea. Death seemed certain for this pious crew but gentle winds pushed them westwards until they approached the shores of the Rhone delta. Black Sara, queen of the local tribe of Gypsies, swam out to guide them in. The Mary's converted her to their Christianity at once and she spent the rest of her life helping the saints. Traditionally the pilgrimage centered around the showing of the relics, the bones of the Marv.


    Joseph of Arimathaea is supposed to have been in this group and it is said that he accompanied Mary to southern France.


    Once there, she conveniently connected up with the Merovingians and with the "de Bouillon Dynasty" that seemed to originate in southern France. It is assumed that, sooner or later, the children of Jesus and "Mary" married into the Merovingian lineage. This infusion of "Holy Blood" happened during Merovee's rule and justified the "new reckoning" and the dynastic name. The Merovingian line eventually led to Godfroi de Bouillon and the Kingship of Jerusalem.


    But what about Glastonbury's claims to Joseph of Arimathaea and the Holy Grail? And what about the connection between King Arthur and the Holy Grail?


    "Mary" arrived in southern France sometime around 35 A.D. if she fled, or was expelled, immediately after the Crucifixion. But the Merovingians didn't cross the Rhine until about 300 years later, and when the Sicambrian Franks did eventually cross over the river into modern France they occupied the north across to Brittany, not the south. Where was the "Holy Blood" during this period of more than 300 years? How did the "Holy Bloodline" in the south eventually make contact with the Sicambrians/Merovingians in the north?


    Archaeological research in Cornwall and Sommerset place some great warlord just where the traditions insisted that Arthur was, in Camelot atop Cadbury Hill.


    Mary Magdalene and Joseph of Arimathaea may have arrived first near Marseilles in southern France, but there is no reason to assume that they stayed there. They may have lived there for some time before moving on to Glastonbury. Marseilles was even then a major port and in close contact with Rome. It would not have been a good permanent refuge. But Marseilles was a major city along the route leading further north along the Rhone, and then west, toward Britain. If Joseph of Arimathaea and Mary stopped at Marseilles on their way to Glastonbury, both bodies of popular legend, the French and the English, would be satisfied.




    24

    The idea that Mary Magdalene traveled on to Glastonbury with Joseph of Arimathaea's stubborn connection with the Holy Grail. The medieval Grail Romances of the troubadours agree that, somehow, he was a guardian of it.


    Assuming that Mary was the wife of Jesus, would make a plausible "Holy Grail" herself. She would have been, in a very literal sense, "a vessel of the Holy Blood". Her womb would have been such a "vessel", her children would have been the Holy Blood itself. And, by extension, this Holy Bloodline was itself the Holy Grail.


    If Joseph of Arimathaea arrived in Glastonbury with Mary and was her companion and guardian, then he would be a guardian of the Holy Grail. The Grail Romances of the troubadours mysteriously connect Joseph of Arimathaea with the Grail lineage.


    In the Gospels he is described as a rich man who was a secret disciple of Jesus. He supplied the shroud in which the body of Jesus was wrapped. I was Joseph of Arimathaea who obtained the body of Jesus from Pointius Pilate. And he owned the land with the tomb in which Jesus was buried.


    The ownership of a private tomb indicates great wealth, the fact that he could obtain the body of Jesus from Pilate indicates not only great influence, but something else. Joseph of Arimathaea must have been a relative of Jesus in order to have claimed the body from the Roman authorities.


    Then, there is the matter of the tomb. Was Jesus put into the same tomb, and resurrected from the same tomb, as the one in which Lazurus was buried and raised? It seems so from the Gospels because this is the only tomb mentioned during the final days before the Crucifixion and after it. This tomb was a cave whose entrance could be closed by a stone rolled in front of it. Lazarus was laid in it. Jesus was laid in it. At least, the descriptions of this cave tomb are the same for both Jesus and Lazarus.


    If this deduction is correct, then the cave tomb was the property of Joseph of Arimathaea. and this cave tomb was on the property at Bethany, at the house of Martha, Lazarus and Mary. The same house where Jesus and his entourage had been offered extended hospitality. Joseph of Arimathaea must have been the owner of this house in Bethany with its cave tomb. He must have been the father of Martha, Lazarus and Mary. He must also have been the father-in-law of Jesus.


    He was wealthy enough to have had at least two residences: a country place in the cool mountains around Magdala. where one daughter. Mary, had been born: and a "town house" in the capital, in the wealthy Jerusalem suburb of Bethany, more convenient for business. Maybe the country place was not in Magdala itself, but in the nearby town of Cana. Jesus seems to have been accommodated at both places, and possibly married in the Cana residence.


    Is there any evidence to support such speculations? Yes, there is. Joseph was "of Arimathaea". Where was that? According to the Biblical authorities who composed the "Helps to the Study of the Bible" found as an appendix to the standard Oxford Press edition of King James version, the derivation of "Arimathaea" is not known, but it was the same place as "Ramah". Ramah means a "high place" and it is listed as one of the "fourteen cities with their villages" that was allotted to the Tribe of Benjamin. Part of this passage has already been quoted (Joshua 18:21-28). Joseph of Arimathaea was, therefore, a Benjamite. And, if Mary was his daughter, she was of Benjamite descent too. This gives some substance and support to those "other traditions".


    Research leads us to believe that Joseph was of the Phoenician and "proto-Celtic" stock. At least some of them joined the long westward migration of the Celtiberians and "Celts" and ended up in Wales, Cornwall and Somerset.


    Which is to say that they ended up around Glastonbury. But they did this long before Joseph arrived. One could say. in fact, that some powerful Celtic families of Ancient Britain were Joseph's long lost relations.


    There has long been a popular tradition that Joseph was a wealthy t i n merchant with business connections in southwest England. There is no evidence for this, no proof, but it is known that the Phoenicians and their Carthagenian colonial offspring were involved in this trade.


    25

    There is a persistent legend in the little Dorset town of Priddy that Jesus came with Joseph on a boyhood visit. Jesus was supposed to have been 12 years old at the time. Priddy is about 10 miles from Glastonbury, slightly to the northeast, and i t s location is easily visible from the Tor.


    Nothing is known of Jesus' boyhood. It is at least possible that he was "adopted" by Joseph of Arimathaea at an early age, and it is possible that he was betrothed to Mary at an early age in a dynastic arrangement. Jesus, Mary and Joseph of Arimathaea all lived in close proximity during the early years of Jesus' life. It would have been perfectly possible for Joseph to have made a business trip to Britain in Jesus' youth and to have taken the boy with him.


    In any case, these connections, if they existed, explain why Joseph of Arimathaea would likely have chosen Glastonbury as a refuge. Not only was it on the fringe of the Roman Empire and as far away from Palestine as one could get in the civilized world, he may have had friends and associates there in the tin trade, people who happened also to be distantly related to him. If Mary was his daughter, it explains his traditional and legendary associations with her, and with the "Holy Grail" as one of its custodians and guardians.


    This line of "Holy Blood" would surely have married into the royalty of Roman Britain. There's a hint that this did happen. One of the kings of Gwynedd was known as Math Mathonwy. "Math means "treasure".


    If the "Holy Blood" came to Glastonbury, then it had more than 400 years in which to multiply and marry into the Romano-Celtic royalty. It doubtless figured in most of the Celtic genealogies, in one way or another, after four centuries of intermixture. But it apparently culminated around King Arthur.


    The Glastonbury sojourn of three or four centuries adequately explains what happened to the "Holy bloodline" up to the advent of the Merovingians. It puts King Arthur in his proper perspective. He, too, was a guardian of the lineage until the Battle of Camlann.


    When Arthur failed, the French connection took over. By Arthur's time, or a couple of generation before him. the Franks had crossed northern France and had reached the channel. The Franks and Arthurians came into contact, as we know from archaeological evidence of trade, and they became natural allies not only because they faced the same military foes, but because they were distantly related. They both possessed an ancient and royal Benjamite legacy that could be rejoined after many centuries and many migrations.


    An Alternate Plan


    The plan was that once the Merovingian dynasty was installed on the throne of the kingdom of Jerusalem, the Merovingian dynasty could sanction and even encourage hints about its true ancestry. This would explain why the Grail romances appeared precisely when and where they did, and why they were so explicitly associated with the Knights Templar. Once its position in Palestine was consolidated, the "royal tradition" descended from Godfroi and Baudouin would probably have divulged its origins. The king of Jerusalem would then have taken precedence over all the monarchies of Europe, and the patriarch of Jerusalem would have supplanted the Pope. Displacing Rome, Jerusalem would then have become the true capital of Christendom, and perhaps of much more than Christendom.


    Circumstances, of course, were always messing up the plans. The Frankish kingdom of Jerusalem never consolidated its position. It never attained the strength and internal security it needed to survive, still less to assert its supremacy over the crowns of Europe and the Catholic Church. The grandiose plans foundered, and with the loss of the Holy land in 1291 it collapsed completely. The Merovingians were once again without a crown.


    In the centuries that followed the Merovingians attempted to regain their heritage, but these attempts were confined to Europe. Among their many plan to regain their heritage was through Merovingian and dynastic intermarriages.


    In order to reestablish themselves, therefore, the Merovingians were obliged to resort to many conventional procedures. On at least three occasions these procedures came frustratingly close to success and were thwarted


    26

    only by miscalculation, by force of circumstance, or by the unforeseen. In the sixteenth century, the house of Guise very nearly managed to seize the French throne. Their last ditch plan was made in the eighteenth century, with the Merovingian bloodline intermarriage with the Hapsburgs, the house of Lorraine had actually acquired the throne of Austria, the Holy Roman Empire. When Marie Antoinette, daughter of Francois de Lorraine, became queen of France, the throne of France, too, was only a generation away from succeeding with their re-establishment of their heritage. The plan was by the Austrian and French union in marriage that they could establish dominion over all of Europe and then the French Revolution intervened to try and destroy centuries of plans. Did it succeed?




    Godfrey of Bouillon, Raymond IV, Bohemund of Tarent, and

    Tancred of Hauteville were the leaders of the First Crusade. The greatest of these was Godfrey, who later ruled Jerusalem.


  10. #10
    THE KNIGHTS TEMPLAR




    By the end of the 11th Century the Christian crusaders had wrested much of the Holy Land from the Islamic Saracens and, in the year 1099 A.D., a French nobleman by the name of Godfroi De Bouillon became the King of Jerusalem, The ascension of de Bouillon's line to the throne of Jerusalem has somewhat puzzled later historians. De Bouillon knew what was going to happen before he left Europe on the Crusade. He gave up his lands and titles in Europe. He allied himself and the fortunes of his House to Palestine. The newly-created Kingdom of Jerusalem was accounted equal to the most illustrious European royalty.


    Nineteen years later, the second King of Jerusalem, Baudoin, established the famous Order of the Temple, better known as the "Knights Templar".


    The Knights Templar have loomed more mysteriously in history than even the curious elevation of Godfroi de
    Bouillion to the throne of Jerusalem.


    At first, there were only nine knights of the Temple and for nine years no other recruits were admitted. The mandate of these knights was to protect pilgrims on all the roads of the Holy Land. Aside from the fact that their numbers were wholly inadequate to perform such a task, there is no record of the Knights Templar actually protecting any pilgrims in Palestine.


    Yet within a very short time the new Order had gained enormous prestige in Europe. Saint Bernard spoke highly of the Templars and a papal decree made them answerable only to the pope and independent of all secular authority.


    Although individual knights of the Order were sworn to poverty and to a strict code of behavior drafted by Saint Bernard himself, the Knights Templar immediately began to amass great wealth. And almost as quickly individual Templars, at least, began to acquire a reputation for overbearing arrogance that conflicted with their supposed code of behaviors.


    "According to tradition, their quarters were built on the foundations of the ancient Temple of Solomon, and from this the fledgling Order derived its name." Some suggested that the Templars were not established to protect pilgrims in the Holy Land, but to form an e l ite guard for the Kings of Jerusalem, and to be a fighting arm of that mysterious power that Godfroi's line apparently wielded. It has also been supposed that the Templars' almost instant wealth derived from some treasure that might have been discovered in the Temple of Solomon.


    It appeared that the Knights Templar very quickly accumulated financial resources that enabled them to become the bankers of their age. This was only the outside appearance tho because they were only carrying out the desires of the de Bouillon bloodline in establishing the first banks. A royal family always has front men to do their bidding while they stay anonymous and this was the case with the Knights Templar, they were the front men. They built protected warehouses all over Europe in which merchants could store their goods in safety. They loaned money and they revived the ancient practice of issuing and honoring letters of credit, cheques, so that merchants could avoid carrying large amounts of bulky and tempting money around with them. Whether or not the Templars did much for pilgrim traffic in the Holy Land, it is certain that they encouraged the growth of trade and commerce in Europe.


    Historians agree that the rise of the merchant class in Europe was the beginning of the end of the feudal system. This puts the Templars in an ironic position. They were the idealized apex of chivalry, the unique ideal of feudalism. Yet their banking and warehousing activities were not only far removed from appropriate "knightly" activities, but assisted the growth of a non-feudal class which eventually undermined feudalism itself.


    Feudalism was an agricultural social structure based on the control of land. Trade and commerce, however, are essentially urban activities and largely unconnected with the control of land and an organization based on




    31

    agriculture. The rise of the merchant class in Europe also marked the rise of the cities. The revival of trade and commerce spelled the end of the "Dark Ages" and the start of the Renaissance and the modern world.


    Because the Templars were independent of all secular authority, they could pursue their banking and warehousing throughout Europe, irrespective of the wishes of the local noble who thought he controlled things. The Templars betrayed the very class they supposedly represented, at least in an economic and political sense.


    The dukes and counts and kings who complained about them saw the situation clearly enough. It is difficult not to conclude that the Templars were somehow intended to fulfill this role. As nobles and knights themselves, the possessions and titles of potential Templar recruits were feudal, and involved control of land By giving up such titles and possessions. Templars not only became unorthodox within the scheme of feudal chivalry as a knightly organization, but could individually work without too many second thoughts to undermine their own class.


    The Templars did not ignore the possibilities of sea-borne trade. They had their own fleet, based in La
    Rochelle. Maritime activities of the Templars have an important bearing on later events.


    The Order had an aura of mystery and sanctity about it that has never been adequately explained. A Bavarian poet-knight and author of Parizival. makes the Templars guardians of the Holy Grail.


    The Templars were believed to be custodians of some great treasure, or of some momentous secret, that subtly altered the orthodoxy of their professed Christianity. Although they are zealous warriors on the battlefields of the Holy Land against geopolitical foes of de Bouillon's clan, they apparently also at the same time established peaceful contact with both Jewish and Moslem savants in Palestine and in Moorish Spain.


    Being unorthodox in an economic and political sense in Europe, they were also apparently unorthodox in matters of religion. It was not long before the initial aura of sanctity was transformed, among the already financially disgruntled nobility, into suspicions of heresy.


    Templars may also have been involved in financing the astonishing and short-lived phenomenon of Gothic cathedral-building. The brief profusion of Gothic-style "Notre Dames" were constructed only during the two centuries of Templar ascendency. Gothic architecture, except for mock-antique constructions, disappeared with the Templars. Just as the Templars' wealth is a mystery, to some people and the financing of huge cathedrals by small towns remains an enigma.


    Gothic architecture contained secret messages in stone, keys to ancient religious and spiritual knowledge. There is evidence to suggest that the "Our Lady" of the Gothic cathedrals was not the Virgin Mary, but another Mary.


    In the year 1187 A.D., after less than a century of Christian rule, Jerusalem and much of the Holy Land was recovered by the Moslems. The dynasty established by Godfroi de Bouillon lost much of its prestige along with its throne.Godfroi de Bouillon had sprung from an obscure bloodline which arose in the south of France. In the Pyrenees. During the 10th to 12th Centuries this area in the south of present-day France was the center of a unique culture. It was unique in several ways. First of all, compared to most of Europe at the time, the civilization of Languedoc and Provence was advanced in the arts and sciences. There was much contact with the neighboring Moors across the Pyrenees, and much contact with the Jewish savants who lived among these Moors. Noble French families in the south inter-married across the Pyrenees.


    The civilization in the south of France was advanced in terms of trade and economics, again because of close contact with the Moors who controlled much of the Mediterranean and a l l of the trade routes to the Far East.


    The most profound way in which this southern French civilization differed from the rest of Europe was religious. It does not seem as if this civilization was really "Christian" at all in the way that term was understood then and is understood now. The civilization was Christian, its religion was a heresy.






    32

    The religion was called "Catharism" or the "Albigensian heresy" after the town of Albi, which was a particular centre of this aberrant religion.


    It is difficult to tell what Catharism really was, because a l l the accounts of it come from enemies of the religion. The Cathars themselves, and their own writings, were systematically destroyed by the victorious Roman Church.


    At the "grassroots" or "village level" of participation, Catharism seems to have been vaguely Christian, or at least molded on the Christian model. There were Cathar churches operating in competition with Catholic ones. By about 1200 A.D., most of the population of Languedoc and Provence patronized Cathar churches in preference to Catholic ones. There were Roman churches in southern France where a mass had not been said in several generations.


    On the simplest level, the popularity of Catharism is easy to explain. The Roman clergy was corrupt and suffered by comparison with the Cathar "parfaits" or "perfected ones" who passed for Cathar clergy. Saint Bernard, who travelled to Languedoc to preach against these heretics in 1145 A.D., was impressed by them: "No sermons are more Christian than theirs, and their morals are pure", he wrote.


    By "Christian", the good saint must have meant Christian in spirit, because the Albigensians certainly were not Christian in dogma according to the tenets of the Roman Church. Indeed, there are some who suspect that Saint Bernard was extremely impressed with the Cathars and became one. in secret.


    Cathar "Christianity" rejected the idea of the death and crucifixion of Jesus. Catharism seems to have rejected the propriety of this sacrifice, and perhaps even the notion of salvation, as these concepts were understood by Roman Catholics of the 13th Century and modern Christians of all sects nowadays. Instead, the Cathars stressed the reality of "unconditional love" and the still-existing l i v i n g legacy of love bequeathed by Jesus as one, and perhaps the latest, manifestation of God's boundless love. It seems as though some of the Cathars, and certainly some of the higher-ranking Templars were able to accept Mohammed within this context, not as a living example of God's love incarnate as Jesus was viewed, but as a legitimate messenger speaking and writing about God's love.


    As "Christians", these Gathers therefore rejected the cross, the Roman Catholic "crucifix", as a proper symbol to focus meditation upon, or worship of. the love that Christ was and remained. Instead, one important Gather symbol was the dove. It represented for them then, as it does for us today, the idea of "peace" or. more accurately the more subtle concept of "grace", that state of being in God's love. After the first crusades, when European Gathers in the entourage of Godfroi de Bouillon established some contact with the Sufi mystics of Islam, the symbolism of the dove sometimes became linked conographically with the Islamic mystical idea of baraka, which also means "grace" and with the idea that a person could be a "vessel of grace".


    Another common Cathar symbol was the serpent or dragon. This probably represented the much-maligned "Serpent of Wisdom" in the Biblical Garden of Eden. The Cathars apparently believed that love without knowledge was a potential hazard to the individual and to others around him. Unguided. ignorant love could be a menace and. from the Cathar point of view, the truth of this perspective was self-evident in the behavior of their enemies, the followers of the Pope and the practitioners of the Inquisition. In the name of love and Christ, the Inquisition of the Roman Church justified hideous cruelties inflicted on an estimated three million human beings between 1200 A.D. and 1800 A.D.


    Therefore the Cathars venerated knowledge, or wisdom, and symbolized it through the serpent or dragon. The Cathars were therefore gnostics (from the Greek gnosis ="knowledge"). Note that the dragon symbolism runs through the whole story of the Grail. King Arthur's banner was the Red Dragon of Wales. Arthur's father was Uther Pendragon - or "uther, the Chief Dragon".


    These Cathar symbols became important after the Albigensian Crusade and the dispersal of Cathar heretics and Templars. Obliged to profess outward orthodoxy, but secretly preserving their heresy and knowledge, the underground heretics or far flung refugees had to devise some means of recognizing each other. The heretical families therefore often adopted names based on Cathar symbols as a means of mutual recognition.



    33

    Family names based on secret Cathar symbolism crop up repeatedly, as we shall see, in the story of transatlantic voyages of discovery and exploration. Christopher Columbus is a Latinization of the Italian "Colon" = "Dove", and there is evidence that Columbus was a member of that Cathar-lslamic-Jewish amalgam that crystallized around the de Bouillon power complex in the Pyrenees and the Albigensian heresy that could, and did, bind together the intellectuals of the three great Western religions.


    In further research you will find an Englishman who adopts the name of Francis Drake (from the Latin draco+dragon), is a pirate specializing in predation upon Spanish Catholic treasure armadas, is knighted by the Queen for his services, and the English Crown seems to be financially involved in h i s freebooting adventures. We may suspect that something besides mere piracy was going on.


    The Cathers were unorthodox in another important respect. They repudiated the idea of priests as intermediaries between God and man. The Albigensians had no priest.


    The Cathars had religious, or "spiritual" leaders. These people were vowed to honesty, poverty, chastity and, apparently, vegetarianism. And they practiced it. Catharism attracted the majority of the population of southern France.


    At the higher levels of initiation it has been disputed that the Cathars were Christian at all. Runicman says that they were Buddhists, while others insist that they were Sufis, that they only used "Christian" words, phrases an parables to ease communication with the simple peasants who had been exposed to Christianity for generations.


    The Treasure


    In addition to all of these departures from European society elsewhere, the Cathar civilization of southern France was supposed to have another distinction. It was believed that they possessed some great treasure, or some great secret, of a religious sort. The exact nature of the Cathar secret has been much debated, but the knowledgeable minnesinger. The Templar guarded Holy Grail reposed in the castle of "Munsalvaesch". which most scholars agree was the Cathar citadel of Montsegur.


    Of all of these departures from European orthodoxy, perhaps the truly fatal one was wealth. The prosperous civilization of southern France excited the greed of the northern French barons. So long as Godfroi de Bouillon's line held a kingdom in the Holy Land perhaps one should say The Kingdom, since it was Jerusalem the prestige (plus the swords of the Templars) protected Godfroi's descendant and his "constituency" in the Pyrenees. But when Jerusalem was lost, hostile forces rapidly converged on Languedoc and Provence. Wealth, probably, was the major motivator, but Cathar and Templar heiresses were the pretexts.


    In 1209 A.D., northern armies invaded the south in response to the Pope's call for a Crusade against the
    Albigensian heretics. This was only 22 years after Godfroi's clan lost Jerusalem.


    A protracted war of unparalleled ferocity raged for a third of a century until the last Cathar stronghold. Montsegur, fell in March of 1244. The Cathars were crushed. The heretics, died at flaming stakes or on the torture-racks of the victors. The Roman Church invented the Inquisition at this time, to interrogate the Cathars by particularly hideous means, and the object of the Inquisition was not only to find the depth of their unorthodox ways, but to find the location of their secret. But the victors did not find the treasure of the Albigensians. Tradition says that it was taken out of doomed Montsegur by four knights a few days before the citadel fell. None of the tormented parfaits revealed where it had been taken, and it is said that those who could still speak after the tortures of the Inquisition sang as they burned at their stakes. The soul of Esclarmonde de Foix ascended from the smoke in the form of a dove so it is said.


    For a time, their sheer power military, political and economic prevented any overt moves against the Templars, even though many had participated in the defence of southern France and even though many had died at Montsegur. But on Friday. October 13. 1307, King Philippe of France ordered simultaneous raids on Templar castles, priories and warehouses in his domain. Again, the Templars apparent wealth and a desire to break their power was the motivation, their various unorthodoxies the excuse. By 1312, King Philippe had pressured

    34

  11. #11
    Pope Clement V into disbanding the Templars. In 1314, the last Grand Master of the Knights Templar, Jacques de Molay, was roasted to death over a slow fire by order of the king and pope.


    Templar apparent wealth eluded the king. In addition to their own reputed treasure, it was widely believed that the Cathar treasure of secret had been passed on to the Templars after the fall of Montsegur.


    The Templar fleet put to sea from its port of La Rochelle a few hours before King Philippe's dawn raids of October 13, 1307. It has never been heard from since. It is a reasonable conjecture that this fleet carried the Templar treasures to safety, and perhaps the treasure of the Cathars as well.


    The Templars who survived King Philippes sudden strike against the Order dispersed to various countries outside of France. They were welcomed in many places. It is known that some fled to Scotland where they found refuge at Rosslyn, the family seat of the powerful Saint-Clairs. And s t i l l others fled to Portugal.


    When the pope officially disbanded the Order in 1 3 1 2 A.D., those Templars in Scotland, Germany, Scandinavia and other corners of Europe went underground. Some joined the Teutonic Knights and fought in Eastern Europe against the Mongols and Tartars. Others apparently formed secret societies which continued whatever concealed doctrine the Templars may have had. It has been asserted by a number of scholars that the Freemasons, the Rosicrucians and the llluminati of Bavaria were offshoots of the Knights Templar.


    What was the legacy of de Bouillon's dynastic ambitions? Of the Templars' supposed sanctity and mysterious prestige? Of the Cathars's supposed treasure and religious secret?


    The Templar-inspired secret societies have also endured to the present day. The Masons, and the Rosicrucians, are still with us. And all professor know a secret truth. We take this with a grain of salt and endure the Shriners' Parades. We express gratitude for Shriner contributions to hospitals. We may be a bit puzzled at their wealth, but shrug and explain it away by assuming that they're wealthy businessmen. But why would wealthy businessmen, and therefore presumably relatively intelligent and responsible ones, be attracted to such nonsense? Might there not be a whisper of something else to it all, something concealed from the rest of us?


    What were all these "secrets"....... the secret of Godfroi de Bouillon's power and elevation to kingship, the secret treasures of the Templars and Cathars?


    During the late 1950's and early 1960's there was a gang of books published about this period. They were almost all written and published in France.


    Many of them seemed to hint that something extremely important had happened. That a "turning point" in human history had somehow happened, but that the significance of it had escaped the notice of establishment historians.


    It seems as though a unique lineage of humanity was almost, but not quite, re-established on earth. This same dynasty had occupied other thrones, in many times and in many places. Scions of the dynasty had ruled before, and some still do. The importance of those 200-odd years was that this lineage had a chance of rising to extreme prominence at a time that was on the brink of becoming "the modern world". Had the dynasty been successful, our world would have been much different. Perhaps much better.


    Later in this book you are going to find out what happened to their plans and how it failed. And why it failed. How its enemies closed in. It was defeated and basically driven i n t o obscurity.


    The long process of rebirth and re-establishment began with the fall of Montsegur and the dispersion of the
    Templars. They are nothing if not persistent. They had "started again" many times.


    Before we can understand exactly what this lineage is, we must follow their efforts, their triumphs and their defeats, because this struggle is what they are, their "reason for being", their purpose.






    35

    More than troubadour romances and esoteric cults survived from the wreck of Godfroi de Bouillon's bid for power. Even in defeat, and during the desperate business of reconstruction as hunted refugees, de Bouillon's dynasty and its faithful guardians molded much of our own modern world. They inspired the "Age of Discovery" and have been behind our progress since then.


    Leaving aside, for a moment, the matter of the more mysterious Templar secrets and the more esoteric religious treasures supposedly possessed by Cathar and Albigensian, might it be possible to come to grips with the identity of somewhat more mundane secret treasures held by these people?


    It is more than possible, because similar secret treasures have come into the hands of modern experts.


    The Templars had been involved in trade and commerce. On land, they b u i l t protected warehouses and indulged in banking. But the Templars also had a fleet of ships, and it is likely that they were also engaged in maritime trade. The prime requirement for maritime commerce, after seaworthy ships, is accurate charts


    Not long after the Templar dispersal, very accurate and inexplicable sea-charts began to appear all over Europe. These maps were far superior to the Ptolemaic maps studied by academic ecclesiastics in the monasteries and fledgling universities. Most of the maps covered the area of the Mediterranean and the European Atlantic coast. They covered the areas crucial to European sea-commerce.


    De Bouillon established the Templars and his dynasties wealth was used by the Templars and, had his Kingdom of Jerusalem survived, its economic well being would have depended upon trade, not upon agriculture. Palestine was as arid in the 12th Century as it is today. And. just as it is today, Palestine is a crossroads of three continents: Europe, Asia and Africa. A natural centre of commerce and conflict between continental powers.


    If the Templars were guardians of de Bouillon's line, one of their prime duties must have been to safeguard information that could control trade on both land and sea.


    Even after the fall of Jerusalem, and the "regrouping" of the family in Provence and Laguedoc. the Templars must have still played this role until the surrender of the last Cathar stronghold in 1244 A.D. Wealth characterized the civilization of southern France, and it was wealth derived in large measure from trade. As the real "power centre" of what might be called "the de Bouillon dynasty", it is unlikely that the Templars would have neglected the well-being of Languedoc and Provence. Cathar wealth prompted the war against them, their heresies merely provided the moral excuse.


    It is likely that even after the fall of the last Cathar fortress, the Templars would have kept their geographic knowledge to themselves for the sake of de Bouillon survivors. So long as they remained a cohesive force, and so long as they remained a recognized Order under the Papacy, the Templars represented a core of strength around which the "de Bouillon dynasty", whatever it was, might regroup and begin reestablishment.


    But with the dawn raids of 1307 and the final dissolution of 1312, the game was up, as far as any rapid reconstruction was concerned. The Templar core was destroyed. Recouping the de Bouillon fortunes would be a long business. Policy decision was apparently made. Since the treasure of geographical knowledge relating to European lands and waters was of limited use to the surviving Templars and refugee de Bouillons, the precious charts would be released to the "general Public" to assist mercantile development.


    The Opinicus de Canestris portolan chart of 1335 is one of many that have survived to the present day. The surviving map show so many similarities, and such inexplicable accuracy, that modern scholars are of the opinion that there must have been only a few original maps, perhaps only one, from which hundreds of copies were made.


    When the maps were released to the public these newly discovered maps caused quite a stir and was the subject of both intense scholarly examination and excited popular press stories because it showed the American continents very accurately.






    36

    From the point of view of the surviving Templars who were still guardians of the de Bouillons, the strange new lands shown on the edges of such maps would have held the hope of a refuge. And the de Bouillons were in desperate need of a refuge for themselves and for their secret that the Roman Church sought so avidly and with such cruelty.


    The new lands on the edges of the old maps represented hope in what must have been the darkest hour in the long history of the lineage.


    But if the European and Mediterranean portions of the maps had proved accurate, why should the rest of the maps be any less accurate?


    There was only one way to find out. Explore. Verify that the new lands existed. Establish a refuge.


    Many of the Templars fled to Portugal, Spain; while others fled to Scotland. Is it mere coincidence that voyages of exploration on the Atlantic almost immediately set out from these two places? Is it mere coincidence that Prince Henry "The Navigator", who began Portugal's and Europe's "Age of Discovery" was the Grand Master of the Knights of Christ, the new Portuguese name for the old Knights Templar?


    There is absolutely no doubt that the royalty of Portugal possessed maps already showing geographical facts that would be "discovered". The maps showed geography very literally "at the ends of the earth" before the supposed "discoverers" ever arrived to confirm the truth of the charts. One of Magellan's officers wrote about the historic voyage to "discover" the passage at the tip of South America.


    We don't know all that was in Columbus' mind, but we know some of it. He insisted to the scholars of the Spanish examining commission that he "might find some very beneficial land or continent" some 750 leagues (about 3000 miles) to the westward. He did exactly that, and at exactly that distance westward. Is that mere coincidence? Or did Columbus, too, come into possession of a chart? Or could Columbus have been a Templar that was sworn to protect the Grail?


    One thing was for sure Columbus knew something. We may never know exactly how much. Or how he found out about it. But is it mere coincidence that his flag-ship, the famous Santa Maria, bore, Templar crosses on her sails when Columbus set sail from Palos? Is it mere coincidence that his voyage was financed, not by the sale of Isabella's jewelry as so commonly thought, but by a mysterious consortium of wealthy men which included Jews and other heretics? And is it only coincidence that Columbus weighed anchor on August 3,
    1492 just a few hours before the deadline for all Jews to be out of Spain?


    We will recall that the "de Bouillon Dynasty" in southern France had close connections with the Jewish and Moslem savants of Moorish Spain. As did the Templars. It seems significant that the Moors were finally expelled from Spain only in 1492, the year of Columbus' voyage. Did he take some of the mixed Cathar- Jewish-Moslem-Templar refugees with him? Was that why the venture was financed by "heretical" money?


    In general, the entire "Age of Discovery" exhibits a curious characteristic. The early explorers show inordinate representation by heretics. Protestants and other sorts of religious dissidents and/or refugees from Roman Catholicism. And, inexplicably, these dissidents and heretics often sailed with charters granted by supposedly orthodox Catholic monarches. And. in some cases, by undoubtedly orthodox ones who were, simultaneously, conducting religious wars of great ferocity against co-religionaries of the explorers themselves.


    In fact, it can be said that the entire early exploration and colonization of the Americas bears the unmistakable stamp of a religious refugee movement.


    The "Pilgrim Fathers" of American history are too familiar to need much elaboration. They were Protestants fleeing from religious oppression.


    But recent research has shown a similar phenomenon elsewhere. Many of the "Spanish" discovers and conquistadors turn out to have been a mixture of Cathar-Jewish-Moslem refugees from Andalusia, the Pyrenees fringe area again, after the region was finally acquired by Catholic royalty from the Moors in 1492.



    37

    In the north, we find Protestants, like de Monts, prominent among explorers and colonizers for the Catholic king of France. And religious wars raged at the time.


    It seems simple enough. Although the Cathars and the Templars had been crushed, and although the de Bouilons were underground, they s t il l somehow weilded some sort of power that the Catholic establishment feared. And. in spite of the persecutions, this power steadily drew supporters. In short, whatever the "de Bouillon dynasty" represented, it could not be completely eradicated. It could only be pushed out of sight, pushed underground, so that orthodoxy "appeared to be served". But not really. There was some sort of secret, and it gave some sort of power.


    Enough, perhaps, to negotiate (or "blackmail"?) a deal with the Roman church and various Catholic monarches. It must have gone something like this: the heretics would, as far as possible, simply leave Europe; they would pay for the exploration of the new lands, take a rather small percentage of any profits of exploitation while leaving the lion's share to the European monarch. The heretics would represent the politics or nationality of their country of origin. But, in return, they would be granted a measure of religious tolerance in the new lands. It was agreed by both parties that it would be "business as usual" in Europe itself, which meant continued ferocious religious wars, the heretics not being w i l l i n g to change, and the Church wanting uniform orthodoxy and absolute control. And, as both parties realized, all the dissidents and heretics couldn't emigrate. There were too many. The stay-at-homes who couldn't or wouldn't leave would just continue to slug it out with the Inquisition.


    There seem to have been local variations of the deal. In some places, and at some times, the heretics apparently agreed to maintain "outward and visible" orthodoxy or, at least, to keep a "low profile".


    It must be understood that there was no mercy or goodwill in this compromise. It was a sort of situation that developed as the result of a balance of power.


    In south of Europe, things did not go so well for the "de Bouillon dynasty." The monarchies of Spain and Portugal became well and truly Catholic. The Church gained control of these countries with a grip that is only now beginning to slacken. And the Church gained a foothold, and then virtual control, in the overseas colonies of these countries. The Inquisition raged in tropical America, just as it did in Europe. In fact, some of the Cathar-Jewish-Moslem refugees who had once fled from Andalusia to Mexico as "Spanish" conquistadors after 1492, later found themselves in trouble with the inquisition, again, in Mexico itself. Many died at flaming stakes or on the torture-racks of the victors. Those who were not prepared to recant their secret Cathar. or Jewish or Moslem tenets fled further. Into the southwestern U.S. And they remained what they always had been, whether in Andalusia or on the coastal plains of France or in North Africa. Herdsmen. As they had been also in Mexico. They began the cowboy tradition of the southwestern U.S.


    As "cow-pokes", they continued to "poke" cows with the long poles still used in Spain, France and North Africa to herd cattle. The same long poles which, in times of war, were the lances of the Pyrenees Cathar- Jewish-Moslem knight-herdsman levies that fought beside the Templars for the lineage of Godfroi de Bouillon. In time, they adopted Catholicism peacefully, along with the American Indian lariat, but they were still called "cow-pokes", even when Anglo-Saxon Protestants from the northeast adopted the trade. They are familiar to us. From endless episodes of Bonanza and Gunsmoke. Just as familiar as King Arthur, from the film and musical of Camelot.


    The "de Bouillon dynasty" fared better. The Church never gained the same sort of authority in the north as it did in the tropics. Not even in the French possessions of North America. There was never any Inquisition in the north.


    Wicca suffered. Witchcraft. The women suffered. Not much, as similar things are accounted in Europe, but they suffered. Wicca. the old fertility religion of Europe, may have been somehow incorporated in the Cathar beliefs of southern France and was destroyed by the Inquisitors. Disguised, even among refugees, it apparently got transplanted to the New World, where, ironically, it was just as ruthlessly persecuted by the spiritual decedents of the Cathars. the Massachusetts Puritans. But it did not suffer much, as things were accounted in Europe. Some 3 million women died in Europe, as witches, so it has been estimated, between
    1244 A.D. and 1750 A.D.


    38

    At least, the Inquisition and the intolerance did not rage in North America as it did in Europe and in the tropics of America.


    It is known that the Templars fled to Scotland, too. after the dissolution of 1312, and it is known that some found refuge.



    A note from the author;
    I am always looking for more and new information about the history that has put us into this pot of hot water that we find ourselves in. The following information I have had for over a year but was not able to use it until the summer of 1995


    As you know the truth is flying our of the wood work at an incredible rate these days and this is just another example of that truth that adds one more important missing piece to the puzzle.


    This puzzle piece puts forth knowledge I was looking for about why the worlds three leading families would dare employ the progeny of Gengis Kahn and Attila the Hun, to bring about a new kingdom.


    During the Crusades some forty thousand Templar Knights went into battle against the Mongols but a fog swept over the protectors as they began to attack. As the fog cleared several thousand of the Templars were missing and remaining Knights were dazed, blinded and confused. The Mongols slaughtered all of the survivors of the "fog".


    Nothing stood between the Mongols and the Atlantic Ocean but the Horde withdrew to assist other armies in a campaign against China. Before withdrawing the Mongols forced secret treaties of surrender with the Vatican. Hapsberg relatives and ancestors of the House of Orange and the House of Hess. The natural "middle-men" between the Mongols and the European powers was a tribe known as the Khazars.


    The secret treaties of surrender are still in effect and never expired.




    After the Mongols withdrew the Vatican declared war on the weakened Templars and directed the Khazars in solidifying the banking systems at later dates. The Nazi's beliefs are an extension of this manipulations.


    As you read on in this book I want you to remember the mastenous fog that killed the Knights. That almost sounds like chemical or biological warfare being used almost 700 years ago, who would have had that kind of capability that long ago? Who would stand to gain most from the treaty in the future as a new world power?
    Who would not want to see a group or race of people establish their kingdom of freedom? Who would want to

    make sure that people remained enslaved and controlled? I am sure that this race of people are finish the sentence. You decide for yourself. You finish the blanks.


    39

  12. #12
    A SAILOR STORY






    It was brought to my attention some time back that Christopher Columbus may have been on a more urgent and important mission when he set sail across the Atlantic.


    There is no proof that Christopher Columbus was born in Genoa in 1451, the son of Cominico and Susanna. There is no guarantee at all that this Christopher Columbus, if he ever existed, was the one who crossed the Atlantic in 1492.


    In by passing a few years to come to 1476 let us take a look at our traditional Christopher Columbus as he would have been twenty-five years of age in this year and he was supposed to have been an accomplished mariner within the Mediterranean world. In 1476 he was part of a trading convoy of five vessels bound from Genoa to Flanders and England. This little merchant fleet had hardly cleared the Straits of Gibraltar when it was attacked by pirate vessels.


    History does reveal that Christopher Columbus found himself in the water, hanging on to a piece of ship wreckage, and he swim some six miles to the coast of Portugal.


    Lucky for us he made it. Christopher emerged as the man who dragged himself ashore on the Portuguese beach. It was at this point that his life became documented and rose to fame in Portugal and Spain. When he reached the beach, he became the Christopher Columbus that we have all learned of in our history books. After his rise to fame he started telling of his birth in Genoese, his boyhood, youth and maritime experiences. In later years his son's Diego and Fernando wrote a book about their father, but Christopher only told them to write what he wanted the world to know about the created Christopher Columbus.


    In all the information on Columbus there is but one brief mention of Genoa and nothing suggesting that he was born there. Further, in Genoa itself there is no record of Christopher Columbus the mariner.


    Who was the man who dragged himself ashore on the Portuguese beach in September of 1476? History does not know.


    Understandable obscurity is deepened by the name of the pirate who attacked this merchant fleet. He was a fairly well known swashbuckler of the era and went by the name Coullon. Coullon is the French analog for Columbus, and both mean "Dove."


    In short, the Columbus of Genoa was pirated by a Columbus of France and only one man swam ashore to make history. Was this man our traditional Columbus of Genoa, or was he the Columbus who was a French pirate and master navigator on the Atlantic, and man of proven nerve and daring?




    The French pirate disappeared completely from the stage of history in September 1476, and Christopher
    Columbus "of Genoa" makes his entrance at the same time.


    Columbus was hired by Rene' d'Anjou, in the year 1472, to sail to Tunis and capture the Aragonese Galleass, the Ferrandina. That is, Columbus was hired to pirate this vessel in the struggle between the Angevins and the Aragonese for the control of Naples. Before 1472, our traditional Columbus of history had never claimed to have been master of a vessel. This piracy, then, was Columbus's First claimed voyage as a full captain. Would an obscure merchant captain be commissioned to do a job of piracy on his very first voyage as sole master of a vessel? A king like Ren' d'Anjou who was a redoubtable and knowledgeable fighting man himself would have entrusted such a mission to someone experienced in the task at hand, piracy. Then, is it not more likely that French Rene' d'Anjou would have favored an established French pirate than a Genoese?


    In 1473, Columbus made a voyage to Chios, one of the Aegean Islands. Chios was a garrison of the Knights of St. John of Jerusalem, that "brother-Order" of knighthood created by the de Bouillon dynasty along with the



    41

    Templars. It is also a fact that, according to the story of the Holy Grail, Anjou was a center where some of the Holy Blood settled immediately after evacuation from Arthur's Britain. The secret of the Holy Grail was preserved in Anjou as in very few other places.


    Columbus also made a voyage in 1473 to an outpost of the Knights of St. John, and the previous year had pirated a ship o behalf of Rene' d'Anjou. Both incidents are at least associated with the complexities of the Holy Grail story. Both seem anomalous within the context of the traditional story of Christopher Columbus.


    Was the Christopher Columbus "of Genoa" a new alias created fro a daring French pirate who was chosen to undertake a desperate and complicated mission? Is the Columbus of Genoa a total myth for all practical purposes?


    The Holy Grail was supposedly spirited out of doomed Montsegur two days before the surrender by four chosen knights, in 1244. Did the Holy Blood survive the Albigensian Crusade? Were operatives working on behalf of the survivors 230 years later? Was Columbus such an operative?


    It has been discovered that there was a family named Columbus did settle in the French town of Calvi and left significantly more documentation of their existence than the Columbus's of Genoa. And there is more documentation about the French pirate Columbus than about our Genoese Columbus.


    Why did he undertake the 1492 voyage across the Atlantic? It is hinted, that he was commissioned to find a refuge for Jews, Moors and Cathar heretics who were all associated with what might be called the "Holy Grail Dynasty".


    As a master mariner, Columbus above all men would not have undertaken such a voyage, even for a noble cause, without knowing that there was land within reach of European caravels of the time.


    Columbus must have known for certain that there was land to the west, that it was within the reach of the ships of his day, and he must have known as well as any other expert of his day that this land could not be the Indies or Asia. But. this new western land which could not be Asia could be a haven for religious refugees if only Columbus were successful in extracting certain concessions from Spain.


    Columbus partly countered objections to his truly impossible project by saying that he "might discover some very beneficial island or continent about 750 leagues to the west" where the ships could re-provision in order to continue the voyage to "Asia." Columbus discovered precisely this, and precisely that distance westward. Is that a happy coincidence, or did he know that some vast unknown land lay that distance away from Iberia? Legal documents suggest strongly that he knew about this unknown land. In the agreements signed on April
    17th, 1492, (The Capitulo) and on April 30th, 1492, (The Titulo) the strange fact is that more attention is
    given to the rulership and jurisdiction of problematical lands that might be discovered en route than to a division of spoils from wealthy Asia. It was crucial for Columbus to extract a guarantee of his own rulership and jurisdiction over any new lands discovered before reaching "Asia" if he knew it was there and needed to control it for an urgent reason.


    Because so many facts have been swept under the carpet of history that it has become unsightly with lumps, even a scholar is compelled to admit that nothing is quite so straightforward as it seemed about Columbus. It is even conceded that Columbus very possibly came from a Jewish family.


    Revelations of this sort, even partly endorsed by some may seem like more than enough shock for the average reader to absorb about someone so familiar. Columbus may have been Jewish? At the same time, Jewish readers can accept that easily and with satisfaction, and may not be inclined to go any further: "Of course, it's only right that someone as famous as Columbus was Jewish! We knew it all along!"


    For the non-Jewish and Jewish-Parisian readers alike, there are yet more curious facts and mysterious associations swirling around the life of Columbus.


    Columbus was part of a noble conspiracy to discover a haven for religious refugees of the heretical "Holy
    Grail Dynasty" of belief. And, whereas it is true that some of these heretics came originally from a Jewish

    42

    background, others and the majority of them seem to have come from Cathar "Christian" and Islamic backgrounds. This "Grail Religion" was a body of supposed fact and associated beliefs and loyalties which could truly convert someone from previous orthodoxy of one of the three great Western religions; it did not mirror the polite farce of "converses" to Spanish style Roman Catholicism that some Jews and Moslems professed openly while secretly practicing another faith.


    Since it is known that some of the Grail Dynasty heretics came originally from Jewish backgrounds, there would not be cause for surprise if Columbus happened to come from a Jewish background too. But that does not necessarily mean that he was a Jew any longer in any meaningful, modern or orthodox sense, anymore than he was the good Roman Catholic he professed to be. He had come into contact with a complex but very plausible body of fact and traditional lore that compelled h i m to transcend his original Jewish, Christian or Islamic parochialism in more universal and cosmopolitan view of human development and human destiny. He may well have represented a neo-Catharism similar to the contemporary "Jews for Jesus" movement which has caused so much consternation within the modern North American Jewish community.


    By 1479 Columbus was back in Portugal working as a Lisbon bookseller and map-maker. In that same year he married Dona Felipa Perestrello Moniz, and this must stand as yet another anomalous fact in Columbus's life. This girl was not a nobility in Portuguese society, but a member of what might be termed the middle-rank nobility. Her father, a decade in his grave in 1479, had been Perestrello, one of the "re-discoverers" of the Maderira Islands who had been made governor of Porto Santo.


    Scarcely two years before, Columbus had come ashore supposedly destitute and, in any case, claiming no noble title. One cannot really expect that he and Bartolome made so much money in the book selling and map-making business, or that Columbus made so much money by shipping out on trading vessels, that their wealth could overcome their lack of social status. Portuguese of the 15th century were no less obsessed with lineage and nobility than other Europeans. How, then, could a presumably poor or. at best, "middle class" Benoese castaway manage to marry into the Perestrello aristocracy so quickly or at a l l ?


    Columbus at least possessed a regal appearance. He was of greater than average height, well built, with pale blue eyes and blond hair and an aquiline nose. His complexion is not what we normally expect of Mediterranean Jews, or Sephardic Jews, who came into Liberia from Palestine during the Diaspora. Some people said that Columbus's hair, blond in his youth, had a distinct reddish tinge.


    If appearance means anything at all, the description of Columbus at least suggests a Celtic or Nordic genetic heritage, not a south European one.


    In recalling your attention to the fact that the Cathars were defeated, their parfaits tortured and burned alive. The Holy Grail itself was taken to safety by four knights just two days before the Stronghold of Montsegur surrendered. If the Holy Grail as being a bloodline descended from Jesus, this means, that one or more children representing the most direct descent from Jesus were evacuated from Montsegur and taken to some place of relative safety.


    If the bloodline survived, according to tradition, the Templars were sworn to defend it above all else.


    Many Templars participated in the defense of Province during the 35-year Albigensian Crusade, and although many died at Montsegur, they still retained a European organization of great military strength and equal wealth. No combination of monarchies.


    The blow fell on October 13, 1307. when King Philippe IV of France ordered simultaneous raids on all the Templar priories in his country. Hundreds of knights were captured, including the Grand Master of the Order. Jacques de Molay. They were a l l tortured, sometimes for months and years continually, in order to extract from them the secret of the Holy Grail and its whereabouts. The Grand Master. Jacques de Molay, was given special attention and suffered for years. It is said that none of the Templars revealed the desired information.


    The Knights Templar, officially disbanded, dispersed all over Europe as hunted men. For the fighting men all over Europe, these refugee knights s t i l l commanded immense respect, and they were welcomed in many places and given sanctuary as heroes.


    43

    In some places, however, the Templars were welcomed and did not have to cloak themselves with too much secrecy. Portugal was such a place. The Knights Templar retained something of a cohesive organization there and merely changed their name to "The Order of the Knights of Christ." and they found royal support to which the Church could only turn a blind eye. First, King Alfonso IV of Portugal became the Grand master of the "new" Knights of Christ.


    The destruction and dispersal of the Knights Templar had at least three direct and important repercussions in Europe, of which the most visible and least important was an upsurge in "piracy." When King Philippe ordered the dawn raids on October 13, 1307, the Templar fleet based at La Rochelle somehow got advance warning. The entire fleet set sail, escaped Philippe's net, and has never been heard from since. This fleet very possibly carried some of the Holy Blood to safety or, at least, that's a geographically reasonable speculation since La Rochelle is a port on the extensive Garonne estuary, and the Garonne River wends its way deep into the Pytenees. If descendants of Jesus were evacuated from Montsegur in March of 1244 they probably hid in numerous secret Pyrenees caverns for months or even years, and some troubadour poetry refers to this. True safety meant being taken out of France eventually, and even out of Europe ultimately. The Garonne River was the obvious route to reach the Templar fleet at La Rochelle. with a sanctuary at the town and fortress of Angouleme which may have been used as a haven for two or three generations. So long as the Templars remained a cohesive and independent Order, there was hope that the de Bouillon lineage could successfully hide secretly in Europe and begin the process of recouping its fortunes. But with the dawn raids in 1307, and the effective destruction of the Templar core, the only recourse was evacuation. So, the Templar fleet set sail a few hours before the raids, and it is not irresponsible to suggest that at least some of these Templar vessels carried "The Holy Grail" because guarding it was the task of the Templars.


    Many different vessels were used as the Holy Blood's navy, to strike back at the hated Roman Catholic Church and the monarchies and countries loyal to it. An upsurge in European piracy begins from this time and the pattern of it suggests that many pirates were not mere freebooters who would attack anyone, but very curious "pirates" who confined their attentions to Vatican and loyal Catholic shipping. Later, of course, Captain Drake ("dragon" would elevate "piracy" to big business, but he preyed only upon Spanish-Catholic ships once the Inquisition had been established in the New World.


    Everyone knows that the proper pirate flag is the "Jolly Roger," a black flag with the "Skull and crossbones" in white. What most people do not know, however, is that this same "skull and crossbones" is carved on many Templar and Freemason gravestones. It is nothing more or less than the old Templar "cross pattee" rendered in human skeletal material with the knobs of the leg bones being the "pattees" of the Templar cross. The message of the "skull and crossbones" is abundantly clear: a "neo-Templar" vow to oppose the Roman Catholic Church to the death, and thus the symbolism of human bones on both the flag and the Templar and Freemason gravestones.




    44

  13. #13
    IN SEARCH OF THE NEW JERUSALEM THE NEW WORLD





    Assuming for the moment that Columbus was part of a great conspiracy to create not just a mere refuge across the Atlantic but an entire "New World" free of religious intolerance, an "New Jerusalem", we can then begin to appreciate the complexity of the conspiracy's problems.


    The transatlantic navigation of both north and south was borne out in Columbus's 1492 voyage. Passage to
    America was both swift and pleasant, but the return trip to Europe was a nightmare to negotiate.


    We can not begin to understand the truly daunting dilemma that confronted the conspiracy. Even though the Holy Grail underground possessed some ships and "pirate" captains to sail them, their resources were insufficient to colonize the new lands independently. Even if they did so. the secret would inevitably leak out because of increased transatlantic traffic. Their colonies would become prey for any and all European powers which wished to conquer them. The Grail Dynasty was beyond the pale of European society, and underground organization that was represented by no nation and protected by no law.


    If the new lands were to be colonized, the discovery of them and claim to them must be the acknowledged work of some established European national state strong enough to support and defend its claim to the new territories. The catch was that all suitable European nation-states were officially Roman Catholic in terms of religion; and therefore officially enemies of the Grail dynasty.


    Even if Columbus could extract a legal agreement form the target nation that nicely balanced greed and independence, the nation sponsoring the voyage would get the lion's share of the wealth that could be extracted from the new lands, while Columbus would demand hereditary powers of vice royalty and absolute governorship in the discovered territories. European monarchs would get the majority of the gold, but the conspiracy would secure a vast new world for the heretics and dissidents to colonize. Refer to the chapter on the "Virginia Company".


    The risk to find the "New Jerusalem " had to be taken sometime in the late 15th century. The new lands across the Atlantic would be discovered anyway by expeditions of European nations. They would claim it as a matter of course and fall under the inevitable domination of the Roman Catholic Church automatically. Columbus, if he could only extract legal guarantees of governorship and practical politic control of the new lands, might prevent this. The underground Grail conspiracy entirely devoted to founding a New Jerusalem of tolerance for all faiths, then the late 15th century was the time to gamble on Columbus's project.


    Meanwhile, any sympathy for the Templars and for any underground Grail Dynasty could be dangerous. Any obvious and provable association with Templar secrets and the Grail Dynasty would be dangerous.


    Portugal could get away with African explorations and the Templar map that inspired them could be passed off as data derived from a Zanj captain. But duplicating this success with Columbus and the New World might seem too much of a good thing. It might well kindle the suspicions of the Inquisition. It would certainly excite the greed and envy of other European states. There would be nothing to prevent the Pope calling for a new Crusade, like the Albigensian one, and envious and much more power kingdoms than Portugal would be only too glad to participate.


    Portugal's apparent apathy about its territories in Northeastern North America had another, and long-term, effect. Other European states felt more or less free to explore the area and eventually to plant colonies there; the English, the Dutch, the French and the Scottish. As history knows well, many of these earliest colonists were heretics and descendants fleeing from the Roman Catholic persecution. The "Pilgrims" of Massachusetts are just one example, but one of national importance to the United States. "New Holland" became a haven for Dutch Protestants. New- France became a haven for Huguenots. Is all this a coincidence? In the 16th century, Portugal became a powerful nation rivaled in European affairs only by Spain. Portugal could have colonized and defended her North American possessions legally confirmed by the Treaty of Tordesillas and could have excluded the Dutch, English



    45

    and French, just as Spain proved capable of excluding other European powers in central and South America on her side of the Line of Demarcation.


    It is also possible that Portugal agreed not to assert any claims to this region because of a 14th-century agreement with the dispersed Templars and the Grail dynasty they guarded. Perhaps Portugal turned a blind eye toward this heretic's haven in return for the maps and geographic knowledge that catapulted Portugal into an age of wealth and empire. It is at least possible that the religious and political freedoms that North Americans value so highly today were made possible by a pact between King Alfonso IV of Portugal and Templars, and that these freedoms derive essentially form the Holy Grail.


    Columbus found the time between 1485 and 1492 to have an affair with the Marquise de Moya, reputedly the most beautiful woman in Spain who was, indisputably, married to the richest man in Spain. There are the inevitable rumors also that Columbus had an affair with Isabella as well.


    These affairs were tolerated, with suspicion, only because the people involved possessed the financial acumen that Spanish royalty needed and lacked. Columbus, aside from his imposing physique and rakish personality, must have possessed, as an "open secret," some claim to, or high-level association with, royalty of a caliber that the Spanish nobility and royalty of the era could not match. Otherwise, so many noble and wealthy women would have not dared to share a bed with him such that their relationships were known well enough to have come down to historians. There was only one lineage of royalty that could fit this pattern; the royalty of the Kingdom of Jerusalem. The royalty of the Western World.


    If we are truly dealing with an underground representing the most illustrious royalty of Europe, and the most critical threat to the Vatican, then "the best defense is a good offense". The Grail Dynasty yet survives and that Christopher Columbus not only serves it, but has powerful allies in high places all over Europe.


    It is even possible that the Roman Catholic Church, and even the fanatics of its Inquisition, may have backed off in the face of Columbus's confidence with his choice of financial backers and mistresses. Columbus in Spain was serving notice that the Grail Dynasty was alive and well. It could not command the power to conform the Catholic Church in open conflict, but it was potent enough to scare the Vatican. In Columbus's time, offshoots of Catharism, more of less garbled, were again surfacing in the world. This would become known as the Protestants but later to be adulterated by the Catholic Church. This faith was emerging in northern France, Holland and Germany. Columbus may have been serving notice in Spain that he represented a formidable religious and politic group that the church had thought it had confidently destroyed during the Abigensian Crusade.


    Columbus had to achieve two things to achieve safety for the Grail group: official claim to the new lands by a powerful maritime European power and legal guarantees of his family's actual vice regal governorship of the new lands. Until he had accomplished that, the potential "New Jerusalem" could not exist. Columbus had to wait for six more years to obtain the guarantees that he thought would protect the New World against incursions of the Inquisition.


    Columbus met with Ferdinand and Isabella for the last and ultimately successful round of negotiations, in Santa
    Fe in an effort to acquire funds to support his quest for the search for the New Jerusalem.


    He had many demands that he felt that had to be met in order for his quest to be successful for all of the Grail dynasty.


    First, he wanted to be officially made a noble of Spain which would empower him to be call Don Cristobal Colon, and his heirs and successors forever were to have that title. Second, he was to be Admiral over all "islands and mainlands" that he might discover before reaching Asia, the same title to be held by his heirs and successors forever, which meant that he and his nominees would absolutely control all shipping to and from these hypothetical new lands. Third, he was to be Viceroy and governor General over all such lands, again powers to be hereditary or nominated bv Columbus's heirs and successors forever, and all officials of these new lands were to be appointed by the monarchs of Spain from a short list of three candidates submitted by Columbus and his heirs and successors; in short, Columbus and his heirs and nominees would absolutely control the government of any new lands forever. Fourth, he was to have the option of paying one-eight the costs of sending forth any ships to




    46

    "his domain." and receiving one-eight of the profits. Fifth, he was to retain, tax free, one-tenth of all the precious metals, jewels, spices and other valuable products which any new lands might produce.


    Columbus also asked the monarchs for several copies of a letter of credence confirming him as an official explorer representative of Spain. These letters were to have blank spaces so that Columbus could conveniently fill in the names of any Asiatic potentates he might encounter. He asked also for a Latin passport entitling him to cross the ocean to the region of India and at the same lime empowering him to take possession of. and govern, any islands and mainlands he might discover on the way as per the five demands out lined above.


    It is quite evident from a l l this that Columbus was much more concerned about the islands and mainlands he mighty reach en route to Asia than about what he would get out of wealthy Asia itself. What Columbus was really asking was nothing less man to be king of any new lands he might discover. These demands could make him and his dynasty more powerful than Aragon and Castile, more powerful than Ferdinand and Isabella. Columbus was not granted these articles and clauses that he demanded immediately by the monarchs. Three months or more were to elapse before the documents were actually signed, what urgent negotiations went on during this time no one really knows.


    On April 17, 1492, the monarchs signed the so-called Capitulations with Christopher Columbus, the all important document granting his demands. It this not a very strange title for an agreement between monarchs and a humble Genoses skipper?


    On April 30, 1492. Ferdinand and Isabella signed another document, the Titulo, which actually empowered Columbus with all the titles and rights he had demanded in return for what he had discovered. In the view of conventional history, the past perfect tense was used so that Ferdinand and Isabella could repudiate the deal if Columbus failed, but the past tense may have been important to Columbus. It was the only way that the concessions would be legally iron clad when he found the new lands that, we have strongly suggested, he knew existed and knew that he could reach. The only other way of writing such a contract would have been for the monarchs to have promised to grant Columbus's demands upon his successful return. Royal promises have often proved notoriously worthless. With the past tense wording of the Capitulations and the Titulo, however, Columbus had his demands legally wrapped up the instant he discovered any new lands.


    Simply. Columbus got his demands, and sailed off and discovered islands and mainlands for the Grail Dynasty and that history is fairly common. History tells us that there was a title wave of immigrants that left Europe for the New World.


    What happened after that is not common knowledge. Between 1493 about 1520, the identity of Columbus's discoveries remained in reasonable doubt. These 27 years or so represent a kind of mini Dark Age in European and American history.


    In 1506. the Bishop of Puerto Rico complained to the monarchs and the Vatican that ships were bringing mostly Jews as colonists. Four years later, in 1510, the Bishop of Cuba made exactly the same complaint to the same authorities; the ships brought mostly Jews and he adds, secret heretics. Thee official royal census for 1545 noted that 25 percent of Mexico City's population were admitted and openly practicing Jews; and this figure did not include secret Jews, heretics, converses or secret Muslims. If this was truly the case, then the majority of Mexico City's population must have been non-Catholic. This seems to have been true because, in 1527, the estimate was that there were more Jews than Catholics in Mexico City.


    Complaints of bishops and the other comments quoted in history refer mostly of Jews but also mention heretics and even Muslims. It is a minor mystery of history why Columbus, in preparation for his third voyage, in 1498, which was a mixed exploratory and colonizing expedition, requested and received three Arab speaking interpreters!


    There can be little doubt that the majority of dissidents emigrating to escape the Inquisition were Jews. A great many unconverted Jews had lived in Moorish Spain enjoying religious toleration. Tens of thousands of known, practicing Jews had to get out of Spain, somehow, by August 3, 1492, or profess outwardly credible Roman Catholic orthodoxy until some opportunity to leave presented itself This large population of Jews form Moorish


    47

    Spain doubtless greatly out numbered the surviving Cathar heretics of Jewish, Islamic and Christian origin. But that does not necessarily mean that the conspiratorial planning and negotiations which made the exodus of dissidents possible was primarily a Jewish achievement. The Conspiracy of which Columbus may have been a part had its origins in the Cathar heresy of the Pyrenees and had essentially been initiated by the fall of Montsegus in 1244. Although Jews were to become the dominant category of refugee fleeing Spain, the conspiracy itself was not primarily a Jewish one but a Cathar initiated one.


    In August 3, 1402, the Jews were expelled from Spain; it did not prevent them from settling in Spanish territories. This may have been merely an oversight on the part of the Church because Spain at that time had no territory outside of Iberia. Columbus had not yet discovered it. Yet it also may have been a deliberate oversight and. one might say. the Catholic Church more less expected religious dissidents to colonize the New World once it had been discovered. But around 1550 the church woke up and changed its attitude. Spain exported the inquisition along with colonists, and the Inquisition immediately set about the extermination of all Jews and heretics who would not convert. The Inquisition of sorts is coming again; refer to the chapter on F.E.M.A.


    Many dissidents converted and avoided the stake, but many refused and were burned alive. This happened in all the major cities of the New World. Some dissidents, however, rather than be burned or recant their faith, fled into the hinterland beyond the easy reach of the Inquisitors, and it is interesting to note that whatever skills these people had practiced before in Spain and Mexico, they reverted to their original ancient occupation. The Cathar Christians, Muslims originally form north Africa and Jews originally from Palestine had all be herdsman of cattle, horses and sheep. They used long poles to prod cattle in the desired direction, just as Berbers do today and as horsemen in France's "conargue" do today.


    These mixed religious refugees from the transplanted New World Inquisition became cowpokes and started the cowboy tradition of northern Mexico and the southwest United States. The first known European cattlemen in what is now Texas was Don Luis de Carvajal de la Cueva, of the same Carvajal family that once helped finance Columbus's 1492 voyage. Don Luis started his Texas ranch in 1592 as a practicing and unrepentant Jew. Unfortunately for Don Luis and his family, Texas wasn't far enough from the Inquisition. Almost all of the Carvajals were tracked down and burned alive in Mexico City between 1594 and 1597.


    All of the refugee cowpokes, and there were hundreds of Jewish and heretic and even Muslim families of them, did not perish in the flames of the Inquisition. Many, or even most, went further afield than Don Luis and found safety; to extreme northern Mexico, and especially into Arizona. California. Colorado and elsewhere. Eventually, they adopted the American Indian lariat, which was more efficient than their tradition poles, and they seem to have gradually become more or less orthodox Catholics. But they were still called cowpokes when newcomers from the Northeast English colonies trickled southwest to adopt the trade and the name lingered even when now independent Americans settled the west.


    The ancient Berber-Islamic, Jewish and Cathar heritage survives to this day, although it is well disguised. The cowboy's musical instrument is the guitar, a word deriving from Al Qu Tar, Arabic for a kind of lute. Although the lyrics of traditional cowboy songs gradually changed to English, the melodies of some have survived for over a thousand years, were originally Moorish or Jewish or Povencal tunes from the Pyrenees. A rodeo is an exhibition of herdsman skills and one event is a demonstration of virtuosos horsemanship around a complicated course.


    The Cathar heretics and hunted Jews would have shared a Columbus like view of the new lands. They sought a home where they realized that they would be few in number among native people with whom they must co-exist. They did not come for conquest and gold so that they could return to Spain and buy noble titles, which was the motivation of the worst conquistador exploiters. The cathar heretics and Jews could not return to Spain at all. Although participants of beneficiaries of the Columbus conspiracy may indeed have represented the majority of immigrants in the early days of New World colonization. They came as colonists, not as conquerors. Very few recanted their faith, and they were burned for it, but many of them fled into the unknown and unexplored interior of North America, and again colonization and co-existence was both their motive and their necessity. They did not push into the hinterland to conquer the people already there. On the contrary, as a mere sprinkling of Europeans among more numerous Indians, they established ranches among Apaches, Comanche, Payute and other native tribes and nations, and, somehow, for roughly 250-300 years this scattered population of European




    48

    Jews and heretics manage to survive among the very same Indians who had to be wiped out in fierce wars when the U.S. Cavalry came to conquer in the 1800's.


    Columbus seems to have been part of an ancient conspiracy whose long term goal is the progress and humanization of humanity. Although his key to the barrier of the Ocean Sea was snatched from Columbus's hand so that his New Jerusalem perished in the flames of the Inquisition five hundred years ago, it was but a temporary defeat in the continuing conflict. His great contribution was, and is that this key has taken the conspiracy momentous secret struggle to every shore. The contest is not against any specific church. It is essentially only against ignorance and intolerance. If the chance for a New Jerusalem perished in Columbus's time in the tropical New World that he discovered, it did not quite perish in other places. The seeds of the New Jerusalem are alive and well in this country still.



    49

  14. #14
    THE LOST FRENCH DAUPHIN






    LOUIS CHARLES BOURBON CAPET KING LOUIS XVI (1745-1793)
    Came to the French throne on May 10. 1774, four years after his marriage to Marie Antoinette, and reigned until his death at the hands of the French Revolution on January 21, 1793.


    MARIE ANTOINETTE DE LORRAINE D'AUTRICHE (HAPSBURG) QUEEN OF FRANCE (1755-1793)
    Brought the bloodline of the Merovingian Kings, through her father, Duke Francis I of the Holy Roman
    Empire and the House of Lorraine, back to the French side when she married King Louis XVI in 1770. In
    1785 their second son Louis Charles was born. Marie Antoinette was guillotined by the French
    Revolutionaries on October 16, 1793.


    LOUIS CHARLES BOURBON LOUIS XVII (1785-1860)
    Was born to the Queen and King of France on March 25, 1785.


    Maria Theresa, Empress of Austria and mother of the French Queen, died without seeing the birth of the Dauphin, an event for which she had longed. She had hoped that the production of an heir would solidify her daughter's position with the people of France.


    The death of her mother left Marie Antoinette alone against the world and even against herself. She found herself surrounded by selfish, frivolous friends, a weak and indifferent husband, and a world that watched her every action with suspicion. She was overcome with anxiety, and her only true friend, the Princess de Lamballe, could only weep with her.


    One evening in early December, in the year of 1780. Marie Antoinette and her companion Princess de Lamballe had gone to Paris to visit a man of great power and mastery by the name of Count Saint-Germain. Marie Antoinette, had asked Saint-Germain to perform an experiment.


    On this visit, the Count had taken the Queen and the Princess into an ornate study and seated the women in comfortable chairs. He sat down before them with a crystal ball. The Princess de Lamballe became absorbed in the crystal ball. Soon she was mesmerized by the sparkling crystal. The crystal ball was becoming clouded, and coming to life. Slowly the face of Princess Lamballe emerged in the mist, but it was the face of a dead woman. The mist about her began to glow blood red, and parts of her naked body floated to the surface.


    The Princess started screaming wildly, with gasps of horror. When confronted by the Queen, she refused to tell the Queen what it was that had frightened her.


    The Queen, pitying her companion, did not ask any further, but turned to Saint-Germain and asked for something consoling. His reply to her was that "the near future is like a sunset, it shows a dark night coming, with light for only a few years". Saint-Germain told the Queen that in one year from that day, the Dauphin will be born. The first of two son's to be born to Marie Antoinette.


    After Saint-Germain told the Queen of the prophecy that was to come to pass with the birth of an heir. He asked her to give some thought to some advice that he added to the prophecy.


    It was not really advice; it was a warning. "It may well bore and humiliate Your Majesty in your present mood. What 1 ask is that you make a short trip to Versailles after the Dauphin is born. Build a bridge between yourself and the nobility and another between yourself and the people. This would resolve and rescue everything.






    51

    Your country is threatened by danger both within and without- Its throne must be a living, lighting symbol; it must fight the greatest battle in history for the trust and love of its people. Your Majesty must give birth, not only to a Dauphin, but to a fuller idea of the kingdom, an idea that can survive the dangerous currents that have been building up since the time of the Sun King." Saint-Germain urged the Queen to heed his words. "Your Majesty is bold enough to take a stand against old prejudices, he told her, make war on the traditions of Versailles, and scorn the hate of the nobility just to gain a little freedom and light-hearted pleasure. Do the same thing, just once, for the good of the people. Try to understand and remedy their ills, acknowledge that they are in an untenable situation; thus you can make an alliance with them. No one can fight two enemies at once with any hope of success; you have to align yourself with one or the other to survive. If you do not wish to ally yourself with the past; make an alliance with the future. Let there be a bloodless revolution of long awaited reforms; these things will eventually come to pass with or without Your Majesty." Sadly, the Queen refused to take heed the words of Saint-Germain.


    As Saint-Germain had foretold, the Dauphin was born in 1781 on the very date he had predicted. Then in early summer of the year 1789, the first born male child of the royal family became ill and passed away, leaving the title of Dauphin to his younger brother that had been born in 1785. The Royal family suffered much at the hands of the Revolution for many years. The family had been moved out of the palace of Versailles, into Paris and then into prison at the Temple.


    King Louis XVI was a quiet, and not very strong-willed man. Contrary to popular rumors in history he had made France the most prosperous of all the European states prior to the Revolution. France held one-half of the money in circulation in all of Europe. In the period of 1720 to 1780, foreign trade was multiplied by four. One half of the wealth in France was in the hands of the middle class, and the "serfs" owned more land than anyone else. The King had abolished forced labor on public works in France and had outlawed the use of torture in interrogation. The King had founded hospitals, established schools, reformed the laws, built canals, drained the marshes to increase the quantity of arable land, and had constructed numerous bridges to ease the flow of goods inside the country. The benevolent King was fostering a rise of the middle class by encouraging a better and healthier society. This situation was intolerable to those who were in the layer just underneath the r u l i n g class, as the rising middle class began to assume power themselves. There was a conspiratorial group that intended to eliminate not only the King and the present ruling class but the middle class as well. The enemy of the conspiracy was always the middle class. The French Revolution was a fraud and hoax. The people were being manipulated for reasons not even made known to them.


    The invisible control behind the French Revolution was the Illuminati, only thirteen years in existence, yet powerful enough to cause a revolution in one of the major countries of the world. The Illuminati had laid down the plans for the Revolution years before, and had infiltrated another secret group, the Mason. France's galloping revolution was assisted in the decades previous to 1789 by the growth of the Masonic Brotherhood. "Freemasonry had come to France in 1725, but by 1772, the organization had split i n t o two groups, one of which became known as the Grand Orient Lodge of Freemasonry. The first Grand Master, the equivalent of president, of the Lodge was the Duc d' Orleans, also a member of the Uluminati. The Grand Orient Lodge spread quickly throughout the entirety of France so that by 1789 there were a total of 600 lodges all over France as compared to only 104 in 1772. Members of the Grand Orient were also active in government, as
    447 of the 605 members of the Estates General, France's parliament, were members. The plan of the Uluminati was to infiltrate the Masonic Order, convert it into a branch of the Uluminati, and then use its secrecy as the vehicle to overthrow the monarchy. The new head of the government would be the Duc d' Orleans. The strategy worked for awhile, but later the Duc suffered the ultimate penalty for his treason against the French government and he died on the guillotine.


    On January 21, 1793. the Revolution killed King Louis XVI. On July 1, 1793, "The Committee of Public Safety"; issued a decree with the following purport: that the son of Capet be separated from his mother, the Queen, and be delivered to an instructor, whom the general director of the committee shall appoint. "And so it came to past that the young Dauphin was separated from his family and put into the hands of Simon the cobbler and his cruel wife. The young Dauphins life became a living hell at the hands of these two cruel people. He was repeatedly beaten into unconscious states and cursed. He became physically and emotionally battered into silence. His only hope was to be freed from h i s prison.






    52

    On October 16, 1793 Marie Antoinette ascended the scaffold of the guillotine as her husband had done before, and so passed to her rest, from all the pains and humiliations of her last years. She left behind her son the Dauphin, and her daughter Theresa and her sister in-law Elizabeth.


    Now, King Louis XVII remained a l i v e but was a prisoner of the Temple. Only a c h i l d of eight years old. but he was still the legitimate king and there were many people that still called him the King of France. Priest in loyal Vendee, when they had finished the daily mass for the murdered king, prayed to God, for deliverance for the young captive at the Temple, the young king, Louis X V I I .


    The royal family had long had a champion or hero that was loved by all for his loyalty and bravery his name was Toulan and the Queen so honored this man with the beloved and honored title of Fide'le. Toulan, with the help of such loyalist's as the Marquis Jarjayes and a Doctor Naudin and Doctor Saunier, along with many other's had been for sometime trying to free the Royal family. Unfortunately all their plans to free the Queen and the children had failed. Time was running out and the plan was made to try and free the young King. These people were working also with the assistance and protection of a rich and noble patron, a true servant of the deceased king. The Prince de Cond'e. who furnished the rescuers with ample means, and is prepared to support to them any extent in their undertaking to free the young King. When the young King was freed he would find in Vendee a safe asylum with the prince, and lived there securely, surrounded by his faithful subjects. The immense difficulty, or impossibility, was the release of the young king from the Temple. But with Toulan's help the outcome was a success.


    Toulan had went a few days before the planned escape to see Doctor Naudin at the Hotel Dieu. in order to beg him to visit a sick boy. The Marquis Jarjyes had found a young boy to become the replacement of the young king. Doctor Naudin was needed to give his judgment on the patient. Naudin's decision determines the fate of the young King of France. The young child of perhaps ten years of age was to become the substitute for the young king in his prison cell. This poor, unfortunate boy, had pale, sunken cheeks, blue eyes, short fair hair, and a stupid, idiotic expression on his features. The child was suffering from an incurable form of scrofula, which would by and by consume his limbs, and convert him into an idiot. He was now deaf This child was the nephew of the Marquis of Jarjayes.


    Doctor Naudin had also visited the Temple to examine Simon and his wife who were becoming ill because of the atmosphere of the prison; the young king was also suffering from abuse and the environment. Simon and his wife were both told by the good doctor that if they did not leave the environment of the Temple that they would both die in a very short time. Toulan had been working with the doctor and had on this trip gone along with the doctor. He also confronted the Simons, to agree to help in the escape of the young king. They were bought out with the promise of a house in the country and 600 pieces of gold. They agreed and became Toulan allies in the prison from then until the young king was freed.


    The young king had requested toys to play with and the Public Safety Committee had agreed that he could have toys brought to his cell in the prison. The young king had requested a wooden hobby horse and Simon agreed to help fulfill his wishes.


    Doctor Naudin. who visited the young king every day, proposed that the youngster might not be all right in the head, and he has ordered, on this account, that his long thick hair should be cut off This way his head might
    be a little cooler. So Simons wife was to cut it off. That was probably the last service that she did for him
    This was done also because the c h i l d that was to be the replacement for the young king had short hair.


    The day before the Simons were to leave the Temple for their new post, Simon and Toulan went to a toy shop to pickup a hobby horse for the young king, and inside it was the replacement child. Upon obtaining the horse Toulan and Simon took it to the Temple and it was placed in the young kings cell. And latper that night the swap was made. The sick child was dressed in the kings cloths and put into h i s bed and the young king was dressed in peasant clothes and was hidden in the wash woman's basket in the bottom. The next morning Toulan came to the Temple to help the Simons to move their belongings out of the Temple to their new post. Among the belongings was one very large cloths basket that contained the young king. This happened on the
    19th of January, 1794. As King Louis XVII, was leaving the Temple, his sister Theresa, who was still living with her Aunt Elizabeth in the upper rooms of the Temple.




    53

    The carriage containing Simon's goods slowly made its way through the country to the custom-house near Porte Macon. Before the building stood a woman in the neat and tasteful costume of the washerwomen from the village of Vannes. which then, was the abode of the washerwomen of Paris. Toulan and Simon lifted the basket out of Simons carriage and placed into the open cart of the washerwoman. The washerwoman was really Marquis de Jarjayes in woman's clothing in disguise. From the Port of Macon they traveled to Vendee, under the safe care of Prince de Cond'e.


    The Prince de Cond'e was the protector and deliverer. The magnanimous prince had furnished the necessary money. The little King would remain concealed in one of his palaces t i l l the time should arrive to acknowledge the young king publicly.


    The young king had been in Vendee for two years, all of which was spent in concealment in the palace of Vendee. This laid a strong and firm foundation on which the superstructure of his life rested. He had excellent teachers given to him by the Prince and had learned much. The Prince de Conde informed the young king of his enemies, and told h i m it was not only people of the revolution but some of the royalists were his enemies. One of his enemies was the Count de Province, which was the brother of the young king's, father.


    He was told that Count de Province was his enemy, as he was the enemy of his mother. It is not the people who have made the revolution in France, it is the princes who have done it. The Count de Province, the Count d'Artois, and the Duke d'Orleans they are the chief revolutionists.


    Then the Prince told the young king that he must be taken to a place where no one can suspect where he would be. The place was called Mayence. This was a fortress on the Rhine that troops of the French republic had taken possession of. The young king was to become the nephew of a General Kleber.


    Given to the young King before he left the Prince de Cond'e palace was a set of documents which related to his flight from the prison that gave complete testimony by those who were engaged in assisting him, plus a detailed account of his flight, subscribed with the princes name, and stamped with h i s seal. He also had the testimony of the teachers who had instructed him about the palace of Chambord. The young king was given these papers, to deliver to General Kleber, who was to preserve the papers for him.


    Under the care of General Kleber. his new nephew, Louis, as he called him, was given instruction in the art of war, and taught the more familiar duties of a soldier's life.


    Years passed on the gloomy horizon of France before a new constellation arose. From the blood spotted, corpse strewn soil of the French Republic sprang an armed warrior, a solitary one. One to whom millions were soon to bow, and who, like the divinity of battles, was to control the destinies of nations and of princes. This one solitary man was General Bonaparte. The same young man who in the first bloody days of the French Revolution lead the storm at the Tuileries, and expressed h i s regret to his companion, that the king did not command his soldiers to mow down the canaille with grape shot.


    Bonaparte hungry for power and glory formed a strong fleet, and Bonaparte, as the commander of the many thousands who were to go to Egypt under him, called to his aid the most skillful, valiant, and renowned generals of the French army. It could not fail that one of the first and most eminent of these would be General Kleber, and, of course, his young adjutant and nephew Louis, (which was really King Louis XVII,) accompanied him.


    On the 19th of April, 1798, the French fleet left the harbor of Toulon, and sailed toward the East, for, as
    Bonaparte said, "Only in the Orient are great realms and great deeds in the Orient".


    Kleber was the second in command. He shared h i s perils, and his victories, with his nephew Louis, a youth of fourteen years, who. from his tall, slim figure, his gravity, and h i s ready understanding, would have passed for a youth of eighteen. Who. trained in the school of misfortune, belonged to those early matured natures which destiny has steeled, that they may courageously contend with and gain the victory over destruction.


    After many battles in Egypt, Bonaparte withdrew to Syria, taking with him Kleber and Kleber's young adjutant, the young Louis. The young king saw the horrors of war. He was there, the son of the kings of


    54

    France, when the army of the republic conquered the cities El Arish and Gaza; he took part by the side of
    Kleber in the storming of Jaffa.


    While in Egypt the young king took i l l due to the climate of the country and it was decided that he must return to Europe. So it was that the young king left Egypt and his companion General Kleber to return to Europe.


    On the 22nd of August. 1799, an hour after midnight, two French frigates left the harbor of Alexandria. On board one of them was Bonaparte, the emperor of the future, on the other was Louis Charles, the king of the past. Nameless and unknown, the descendant of the monarchs of France, with his sixteen years, returned to France. Upon his return to France. Louis was given a place to live by a man, by the name of Desaix. Young Louis now became known as General Desaix's young adjutant and that was his only rank and title. At the end of the year of 1800 the frigate l'Aigle, on its return from Egypt, brought a great packet for General Desaix. It contained many papers of value, many rolls of gold pieces, besides gems and pearls. But it also continued a sealed black document directed to the adjutant of General Desaix. This document contained the will of Kleber. commander in chief of the French army in Egypt. He had given it to General Menou. together with his papers and valuables, with the intimation that directly after his death they should all be sent to General Desaix in France. General Menou followed this instruction, for Kleber was dead. The murderous bullet of a Mameluke killed him on the 14th of June, 1800. His will was the last evidence of his love for his nephew Louis, whom he designated as his only heir, and Kleber was rich, through inherited wealth as well as the spoils of war.


    Louis Charles took no satisfaction, and it made no impression on him, when Desaix informed him that he was the possessor of a million francs. Desaix informed Louis Charles that he should deposit the gold with someone so that it would be safe. And he suggested Fouch'e. At this name, Louis became startled at the suggestion because Fouch'e was the chief of police. Fouch'e was a traitor, who gave his voice in the Convention for the death of King Louis XVI, the red republican, a man of blood and treachery. Louis did not want this man to become the guardian of his most valuable papers and property.


    Desaix explained to the young king that it was very important for h i m to take good care of what property that he had. Poor as he was in love and happiness, this million francs made him at least a free and independent man. Fouch'e received the young king exactly as Desaix had expected that he would. He showed himself in the light of a sympathetic protector; he was touched with the view of this youth, whose countenance was the evidence of his lineage, the l i v i n g picture of the unfortunate Louis XVI, whom Fouch'e had brought to the scaffold. Perhaps this man of blood and the guillotine had compunctions of conscience; perhaps he wanted to atone to the son for his injuries to the parents; perhaps he was planning to make of the son of the Bourbons a check to the ambitious consul of the republic.


    Fouch'e told Louis that he was a loyal subject, and promised to take all means to restore the young king to the throne of his fathers. He conjured Louis to trust him, and to enter upon no plan without asking his counsel. Fouch'e knew that Kleber was the keeper of Louis' very important papers, about who he really was. And that the deceased Klebers paper was a letter directed to Bonaparte, stating that he, Kleger, knew very well that the little Capet was still living, and imploring Bonaparte to restore the orphan to the throne of the Lilies.


    Fouch'e told Louis to always have his identity papers in a safe place at all time because his future depended on the truth that was sealed in these papers. Fouch'e gave Louis documents that would give him possession of his wealth. Fouch'e had deposited Louis' funds in the Bank of France, and told him that he could draw out money at any time by presenting these checks that he gave him by simply writing his name on them. Louis now needed another name. The new name given was to be Baron De Richemont. Fouch'e told Louis that he would have the necessary certificates and papers made out. at the Bank of France under the name of the Baron de Richemont.


    Soon after this Louis decided to leave France. At about this time the borders had become blocked so Fouch'e made arrangement with the wife of Bonaparte, Josephine to help Louis escape France again.


    Upon his meeting with Josephine Louis told her of his escape from prison and how he was taken to a solitary castle, and had remained there for several years, and from that time on he had always lived in foreign countries. He told her of his plans to go to America. There were ships sailing southward from Marseilles




    55

    everyday, and in one of these he decided to leave on his trek to America. Close to the date of February 16.
    1804 the young king, now Baron de Richemont (for a short period of time), left France for America.


    Young Louis stayed in England, and for a undetermined period of time was taken under the sheltering wing of
    Queen Charlotte Mecklenburg-Strelitz. wife and Queen of King George I I I .


    After Louis left France it was found that Bonaparte was in hot pursuit of the young king and had found out what his new name was. It was time for another name change this time it was the French word for "pay master", Paiesieur. Daniel was taken under the protective wing of the royal families trust alley the Royal Paymaster. George Paiesieur, who had escaped the Revolution. In those times people used their trade name as a last name. Louis took the name Daniel Paiesieur; the Anglicized version of which is known nowadays, through more imaginative, phonetic, and illiterate translation, as several names, such as Bayshore, Pasour, Paysour, Paseur, and more literally, as Payseur. The people just had a hard time understanding what the Frenchmen were t e l l i n g them that their name was because of the way the French roll their words. As history- has shown, the French name Paiesiur has been many times perverted into different spellings.


    Now the Crown Prince Louis, is disguised as Daniel Paiesieur while in England (with his English relatives), bought shares in the Virginia Company, and a covenant, under the Virginia Company. The King, gave him, a ship and enough supplies to enable h i m to sail to America, there to start a new life.


    He landed at what is now Boddie Island, in North Carolina. After a brief stay with the Boddie family, who were themselves relatives of the English Royal family. He and George, then traveled further inland, eventually settling just north of what is now the border between North and South Carolina, in the west end of the State.


    To disguise the facts as to who or where the Crown Prince really was, King George III, back dated a Land Grant to 1749 and gave it to Louis' trusted traveling companion only known as George (Paiesieur) Bashore.(now the "father" of the Crown Prince, "Daniel"). Excerpts from this land grant stated.


    "Granted... to George Bashore of Alsace, France... by His Majesty George II , of England. Ye parcel of land measuring 600 acres in ye district of Tryon in ye Province of Carolina and Anno Domini, 1749".


    This land grant executed by "King George II" back dated is very unique, as it is entirely out of sequence for the time period and the area (which is now known as Dallas. North Carolina). This one was in 1749, the others of that area were all done in the 1760s. King George I I I was not good at History or Geography. In 1749 the County of Tryon did not exist, and when it did exist it only lasted for eleven years. Tryon County North Carolina was not formed until 1768, eight years after the death of King George I I , and in 1779 it was divided into two Counties which were named Lincoln and Rutherford. It did exist at the time of King George III. however, when he was between 30 and 41 years of age, (having been on the English throne for eight years).


    The companion of the Crown Prince Louis, one George Bashore, who could not read or write English, died in
    1831, and, in his will, passed the 600 acre parcel on to his claimed to be "son", Daniel "Payseur". Daniel Payseur died in 1860, and in his will passed the same parcel on to his eldest son Adam, who, being childless upon his death, passed the parcel in his will to his nephew. Lewis Cass Payseur. the son of his brother, Jonas W. Payseur, and the grandson of Daniel. This same piece of land has been increased to over 3000 acres and is still considered to this day by the State of North Carolina to be "French Foreign soil".



    56

  15. #15

  16. #16
    THE BLOODLINE OF KINGS






    The leader of the first "Crusade" into the "Holy Lands" was Godfrey De Bouillon, and in that same chapter it was also mentioned that the original French Kings, or Kings of the Franks, as France was far back as the founder of the Merovingian Bloodline and Dynasty, King Merovee of 4 1 7 A.D.. It was not mentioned, however, that the same bloodline of French Kings is traceable from Godfrey De Bouillon up to the present dav.


    The Merovingian Dynasty, is so named after the King who is considered to be the founder, or first king of the bloodline, the Frankish (French of today) King Merovee. This bloodline survives to this day, and is traced from a common beginning, splits into two separate "lines" and re-combines later on.
    THE BEGINNING Merovee
    Frankish leader in 417 to die in 448


    Merovee
    "The Young". King of the Franks of Yssel from 448 to 458.


    Childeric 1
    Son of Merovee ("The Young"), and King of Franks of Yssel from 458 to his death in 481. The Frankish Capital City was at Tournai during his reign, from whence Childeric extended his territories to include Cologne, Mainz and Metz. Childerics grave was discovered at Tournai in 1653.


    Clovis I (456-511)
    King of the Franks from the death of his father. Childeric I in 481, baptized by St. Remi on December 24, 496 to consequently be officially recognized as King by the Roman Catholic church, and thereby be called the first of the "Holy Roman Emperors". Married to Clothilde, a Christian (Roman Catholic) who was niece of the king of Burgundy. Upon Clovis' death, his Kingdom was divided among his four sons;
    Thierry I King of Austria 511-534, from Clovis' first
    marriage to the pagan Evochilde; Clodimir, King of Orleans 511-524; Childebert, King of Paris 511-588


    Clotaire I (497-561)
    King of Soissons from 511 until 558 when he became King of the Franks. Clotaire I had six (6) wives, conquered the Thuringian Kingdom in 531, then the kingdom of Burgundy in 535, then consumed (by inheritance or annexation) Metz, Orleans and Paris to become sole ruler of the Franks from 558.


    Chilperic I
    King of Soissons, 561-584, and had two wives.


    Clotaire II
    King of the Franks 584-628. had 3 wives.


    Dagobert (602-638)
    King of Austria from 622, King of the Franks in 630, had five wives.


    Sigisbert III (629-656)
    King of Austria from 632. Married to Immachilde.









    6 1

    Dagobert II (651-679)
    After a prolinged exile in Ireland and England, assumed the title and position of King of Austria from 674. He was assassinated on December 23rd, 679 by one of his servants who was acting under the orders of the Mayor of the Palace. Pepin D'Heristal ("the Fat"). Dagobert II had a son (by his marriage to his second wife, Giselle de Razes) who was named Sigisbert (Sigisbert IV).


    "LINE 1". THE HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE


    With the assassination of Dagobert II (endorsed by the Roman Catholic church), the throne was usurped by Grimoald, but the real regal power was held by Pepin d'Heristal, the mayor of the palace, whose son, Charles Martel, inherited the position. Charles Martel never took over the throne, preferring to stay in control, while making sure that a member of the "royal family", seen to be the ruler. The privilege of the seizure of the throne fell to his (Martels) son, Pepin III, who deposed Childeric I I I in 751. Pepins seizure of the throne was officially endorsed by the Roman Catholic church in 754 when Pope Stephen II officially "anointed" him as King of the Holy Roman Empire. The deposed Childeric I I I was kept in a monastery at Sithiu, where he died in 755. leaving Pepin III, undisputed, on the throne. Pepin I I I died in October of 768.


    Charlemagne (Charles the Great/Charles I/Carolus Magnus) (742-814)


    Charlemagne and his brother, Carloman. became joint Kings of the Franks in 768, until the death of Carloman in 771, when Charlemage inherited the entire kingdom.


    Charlemagne is generally acknowledged as being the original founder of what has been later termed "The Carolingian Dyanasty" (from the latin for Charles - "Carolus"), but this honour was actually attributed to his grandfather, Charles Martel.


    Throughout the next twelve years Charlemagne made a name for himself as an excellent tactitian and warrior, and it was with this in mind (as well as the growing unrest in Byzantium) that the Pope (and, of course, the Roman Catholic church), in an effort to recruit the help of the divinely appointed "Protector of Rome (the Christian Church)", "annointed" Charlemagne and crowned him "Holy Roman Emperor" on Christmas day. A.D. 800.


    Charlemagne left a great portion of his wealth and land to the church (Roman catholic, of course), and died on
    January 28th, 814, leaving the rest of his empire to his last surviving son, Louis.


    (Ludwig) Louis 1 (778-840) ("the Pious")
    Succeeded to the throne of Aquitane in 781, was crowned Frankish co-emperor and heir on September 11, 813, and Holy Roman emperor on October 28, 816. He made out a will which, upon his death, would divide his empire between his sons. He then remarried after his first wife died and had another son, so he re-wrote his will in 829, dividing the empire s t i l l further. The fight between the brothers lasted three years after his death in 840.


    (Ludwig) Louis II (804-876)
    Upon the death of his father, Louis joined with one of his brothers, Charles I ("the Dald"), to fight another brother. Lothair I.


    The Treaty of Verdun, signed in 843, ended the conflict, and divided the lands which comprised the Holy Roman Empire of Charlemagne. Most of what is now France went to Charles I (823-877) (Karl I, "the Dald"), who was the first to rule the separate country of France, Lothair kept the land in between, from the North Sea to Italy (the Italian territory was soon therafter lost) part of the remaining kingdom was called "Lotharingia", later to be known as the Lorraine region of trance.


    The remaining brother (Louis I I ) gained all of the German Lands East of the Rhine river, which is now Germany, plus he retained the title of Holy Roman Emperor, thereafter becoming known as the founder of the German Kingdom.




    62

    Karl (Charles) III ("The Fat") (839- Jan. 13. 888)
    Received what remained of Lorraine from the split between himself and h i s two brothers (Karlmann and
    Ludwig) of the kingdom in 879, was crowned Holy Roman Emperor in 884.


    Arnulf (850- December 8. 899)
    Nephew of Karl (Charles I I I ) . King of the East Franks in 887, crowned Holy Roman emperor in 896


    Ludwig. ("The child") (893-November 24, 911)
    Reigned during the time of intense feuds between the nobles, being regarded upon cessation of hostilities as
    Feudal Overlord.


    Konrad I (876-Pecember 23. 918)
    Duke of Frankonia, interim ruler chosen by committee of nobles assembled at Forcheim. Franconia.


    Henry (Heinrich) I ("The Fowler") (876- July 2. 936)
    Duke of Saxony, son of Duke Otto I of Saxony. Founder of the Saxon Dynasty, acceeded to the throne on
    May 12, 919.


    Otto I ("The Great") (912-973)
    Succeeded his father (Henry I) in 936. In 951 crossed the Alps and declared himself King of Italy, but had to return to Germany to quell revolts. Pope John XII crowned him Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire (in his own words "Romanorum Imperator Augustuas") on February 2, 962.


    Otto II (955-983)
    Was the last of the Saxon Emperors when he was crowned King of the Germans at the age of three, upon the death of his father (Otto II). He spent most of his life in Italy, trying to restore the glory of the Roman Empire, while leaving his mother and grandmother at home to rule as Regents.


    Henry II (The Saint") (May 6. 973 - July 13. 1024)
    Also of the Saxon Dynasty, duke Henry IV of Bavaria, became Holy Roman Emperor on February 14, 1014.


    Konrad II (990- 1039)
    First of the Salian dynasty, succeeded to the German Kingship on September 8, 1024. became King of the Lombards in 1026, Crowned Holy Roman Emperor on March 26, 1027, inherited the Kingdom of Burgundy from Rudolphe III of the House of Welf, and was crowned King of Burgundy on February 2, 1033.


    Henry III(1017- 1056)
    Son of Konrad II, became King in 1039, and was crowned Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire in 1046.


    Henry V (1081 - 1125)
    Son of Henry IV, ruled from 1106.


    Lothaire II (1075- 1137)
    Of the Supplinburg House. Duke of Saxony and Holy Roman Emperor from June 4, 1133.


    Konrad III(1093-1152)
    Son of Duke Freidrick I of Swabia. Duke of Franconia and King of the Lombards, ruled from 1125.


    Frederick I ("Red Beard", or "Barbarossa") (1121 - 1190)
    Succeeded his father, Conrad I I I as King in 1152, becoming Holy Roman Emperor in 1155. He drowned while crossing a river during the third Crusade to the Holy Land.


    Henrv V (1165- 1197)
    One of the Luxembourg Dynasty, succeeded his father, Frederick I in 1190. Henry VI is noted for his claims on Sicily, thanks to h i s marriage to Constance of Sicily, and also as the Emperor who extorted the huge ransom




    63

    from the British Crown for the release of the English King Richard I (The Lionheart) from imprisonment under the Duke of Austria. Henry VI died suddenly at the age of 32.
    Frederick II (1194- 1250)
    Called "Stupor Mundi" the amazement of the World, belonged to the Hohenstaufen family, was the son of the
    Holy Roman Emperor Henry VI, and the grandson of Frederick I "Barbarossa".


    Frederick II was crowned King of the Germans at the age of 2, and King of I t a l y at 4. He became Holy
    Roman Emperor in 1215, and crowned himself King of Jerusalem in 1229.


    Konrad IV (April 25, 1228 - May 21. 12541
    Son of Frederick II, Duke of Swabia, King of Germany in February 1237.


    Then followed what has come to be known as "The Breat Interregnum" when Richard, Earl of Cornwall (January 5, 1209 - April 2, 1272) was elected King of Germany but could not gain acceptance from the German people, followed by Alfonso X "The Wise" November 23, 1220 April 4, 1284. whose election to the kingship was rejected by the Pope and abdicated in 1275. Alfonso was followed by;


    Rudolph I (May 1, 1218 - July 15. 1291)
    Count of Hapsburg. of the House of Hapsburg, Son of Count Albrecht IV of Hapsburg, Duke of Swabia, Duke of Austria from 1274 to 1282, Duke of Carinthia 1276- 1286.


    Adolph(l248 July2. 1298)
    Of the House of Nassau, succeeded on May 5, 1292, and was shortly thereafter deposed.


    Albrecht I (July 1248 - May 1, 1308)
    Of the House of Hapsburg, son of Rudolph I, succeeded to the throne on July 27, 1298 and was assassinated on May 1, 1308.


    Henry (Heinrich) VII (1269 - August 24, 1313)
    Of the House of Luxembourg, succeeded to the throne on November 27, 1308, Duke (Henry V) of
    Luxemburg, became King of the Lombards on January 6, 1311, Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire on June
    29, 1312.


    Frederick ("The Fair") (1286 - Jan 13, 1330)
    Son of Albrecht I and Duke of Austria, succeeded to the throne jointly with Ludwig (Louis V), as below on
    October 19, 1413 and relinquished it in 1326, leaving the throne to;


    Ludwig (Louis) IV "Bavarian" (April 1, 1282- Oct. 11, 1347)
    Of the House of Wittlesbach, son of Ludwig II of Bavaria, who became Holy Roman Emperor on January 17,
    1328.


    Karl (Charles) IV (Mav 14. 1316 - November 29. 1378)
    Of the House of Luxemburg, grandson of Henry VII. ruled in conflict with Ludwig IV (above) from July 11,
    1346, crowned Holy Roman Emperor on April 5, 1355.


    Wenzel (February 26, 1361 - August 16, 1419)
    Succeeded to the throne on November 29, 1378 to be shortly thereafter deposed on August 20, 1400.


    Ruprecht I (May 5, 1352 - May 18, 1410)
    Of the House of Wittlesbach, succeeded to the throne on August 21, 1400.


    Jodokus (or Jobst)(1351 - January 18, 1411)
    Of the House of Luxemburg, reigned briefly from October 1, 1410 to January 18, 1 4 1 1 in rivalry with his cousin;








    64

    Sigismund (August 10, 1397 - December 9, 1437)
    Son of Karl (Charles) IV, King (Zsigmond) of Hungary, King (Zikmund) of Bohemia in 1419, King of the
    Lombards in 1431, and Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire from May 31, 1433.


    Albrecht II (August 10, 1397 - October 27, 1439)
    Son-in-law of Sigismund, Archduke of Austria. King of Bohemia, Duke of Kuxemburg. King of Hungary, reigned from March 18, 1438 to October 27, 1439.


    Frederick III (Sept. 21, 1415 - Aug. 19, 1493)
    Grandson of Archkuke Leopold of Austria, was crowned on February 2, 1440. became King of the Lombards in 1452, and Holy Roman Emperor on March 19, 1452.


    Maximillian I (March 22, 1459 - January 12, 1519)
    Son of Frederick III, of the House of Hapsburg. succeeded his falher on August 19, 1493. Charles V (February 24, 1500 - September 21, 1558)
    Grandson of Maximillian I, son of P h i l l i p I of Spain, acted as deputy for his father until his succession to the throne on June 26, 1519, and reigned until his abdication as Holy Roman Emperor on September 1, 1556.


    Ferdinand I (March 10. 1503 - July 25. 1564)
    Brother of Charles V, succeeded the throne on September 1, 1556, Archduke of Austria, King of Hungary, King of the Romans.


    Maximillian II (July 31, 1527 - October 12, 1576)
    Son of Ferdinand I, Archduke of Austria. King of Hungary. King of the Romans.


    Rudolf II (July 18, 1552 - June 13, 1612)
    Son of Maximillian II. Archduke of Austria, King of Hungary.


    Matthias (February 24, 1557 - March 20, 1619)
    Brother to Rudolf II, Archduke of Austria, King of Hungary.


    Ferdinand II (July 9, 1578 - February 12, 1637)
    Cousin of Matthias, succeeded on August 20, 1619, Archduke of Austria, King of Hungary.


    Ferdinand III (July 13, 1608 - April 2, 1657)
    Son of Ferdinand II, Archduke of Austria, King of Hungary, King of the Romans.


    Leopold I (June 9, 1640 - May 5. 1705)
    Son of Ferdinand III, Archduke of Austria, King of Hungary, succeeded to the throne on July 18, 1658.


    Joseph I (July 26, 1678 - April 17, 1711)
    Son of Leopold I, Archduke of Austria, King of Hungary, King of the Romans.


    Charles VI (1685- 1740)
    Brother of Joseph I, became Holy Roman Emperor on April 17, 1711, and had no male heirs, so he made the European Rulers accept the idea that h i s eldest daughter Maria Theresa, could inherit the Hapsburg possessions upon his death. They agreed, but broke their promise when he died.


    Maria Theresa (1717-1780)
    Married Duke Francis Stephen of Lorraine, and bore h i m sixteen children, four of whom were to figure prominently in history. Two sons, Joseph and Leopold, and two daughters. Marie Antoinette, and Maria Louise(179l-1847).


    Maria Theresa thus brought the bloodline of the original Merovingian Dyansty (through the House of
    Lorraine, descendents of Godfroi ("Godfrey of Loraine") back into the fold of the Holy Roman Empire.


    65

    and back under the terms of the pact with the Roman Catholic Church made through the baptism of
    Clovis I on December 4, 496.


    Francis I(1708-1765)
    (Duke Francis Stephen of Lorraine)
    Was the husband of Maria Theresa, the descendant of the house of Lorraine, and the carrier of the Merovingian bloodline from Godfrey. All that was necessary was to have a son who himself had heirs. Sadly, this did not happen, leaving the bloodline to be carried through the eldest daughter, Marie Antoinette.


    Joseph II(1741-1790)
    Came to the throne in 1765 upon the death of his father, and was co-ruler "under" Maria Theresa until her death in 1780, whereupon he became sole ruler of not only the Empire, but the Hapsburg dominions as well. He died without heirs, despite two marriages, on February 20, 1790.


    Leopold II(1747-1792)
    Succeeded his brother (Joseph II) as Emperor on the death of his brother. Joseph II) on February 20, 1790. but remained only a short time until his own death, suddenly and also without heirs, on March 1, 1792.


    Francis II (1768-1835)
    A nephew of both Joseph II and Leopold I I , and the eldest son of the Grand Duke Leopold of Tuscany, was born in Florence on February 12, 1768. He had reigned as Holy Roman Emperor from 1792 to 1806, and was Emperor of Austria from 1804 to 1835.
    "LINE 2". FRANCE S1G1SBERT IV (676-758)
    Escaped from Pepin to the south, with the help of his mother, to sometime therafter acquired the titles of
    "Duke of Razes, and Count of Rhedae." The titles formerly held by his uncle. Bera I I .


    A series of Counts of Razes, followed Sigisbert IV, beginning with Sigisbert V born between 695 and 698 and died between 763 and 768, then Bera III 715-770, Guillaume. Bera IV 755-813, Argila 775-836, Bera V 794-
    860, Hilderic I died in 867 and Sigisbert IV died in either 884 or 885, who was the last Count of Razes of Merovingian descent, and was also known as "Prince Ursus". From Prince Ursus (Sigisbert VII), came Guillaume II who fled to England in 914 to escape the Viking raids, his son was Guillaume II, whose son was Arnaud, whose son was Bera IV, who died in 975, who also had a son. Sigisbert VII who died between 978 and 982. Sigisbert VII's son Hugues I 951-971, married a girl of Greek descent and they had two sons, the heir being Jean I who died in 1020, but not befor having a son, Hugues, who, in turn, had a son, Eustache born in 1010, before he died in 1015. Eustache I adopted the title of Count of Boulogne as a result of the death of Ernicule. his mothers second husband in 1041. The successor. Eustache I I , accompanied William the Conqueror to England in 1066, returning home triumphant to die in 1081.


    Eustach II had several children from his marriage to Ide d'Ardennes, one of whom was to carry the family "Torch" far and wide. He was Godfroi 1061-1100, his name, anglicised, being "Godfrey", Count of Bouillon, Duke of Lower Lorraine from King Henry IV in 1087, and finally as a result of the victories of the first of the Crusades, led by Peter the Hermit into the holy land, in 1099, King of Jerusalem. Upon his death in 1100, his brother, Baudoin, succeeded him as King of Jerusalem until he died in 1111.


    RE - COMBINING THE "BLOODLINES" The french Lineage


    Charles I ("The Bald") (823-877)
    One of the three sons of Louis II and grandsons of Charlemegne, who became, thanks to the Treaty of Verdun of 843. the first King of the newly independent France.


    Charles II ("The Fat") (839-888)
    Succeeded his father in 885, but was deposed by the Nobles in 887.





    66

    Charles III ("The Simple") (879-929)
    Succeeded his father, Charles II after a 5 year rule by the Nobles, in 893, but the nobles were too powerful for him and he was imprisoned and deposed in 923.


    Raoul (or Rodolphe)
    Duke of Burgundy. Succeeded on July 13, 923 and reigned until January 14, 936.


    Louis IV (d"Outremer) (921 - Sept. 10, 954)
    Son of Charles III ("The Simple"), of the Carolingina House, was recalled from exile in England and elected to the throne.


    Lothaire (941 - March 2, 986) Son of Louis IV.


    Louis V (967 - Oct 24, 996)
    Reigned alongside his father Lothaire from June. 979 until Lothaire's death in 986.


    Hugh Capet (938 - October 24, 996)
    Founder of the "Capetian Dyansty" which lasted until the death of Charles IV in 1328. Capet ruled France from his election to the throne, by the Nobles, in 987 until his death.


    Robcr II ("The Pious") (970 - 1031)
    Son of Hugues Capet, reigned from 996.


    Henry I (1008- 1060)
    Son of Robert I, reigned from 1031.


    P h i l i p II (1053- 1108)
    Son of Henry I, reigned from 1060.


    Louis VI (1081 - 1137)
    Son of Philippe I, reigned from 1108.


    Louis VII (1120- 1180)
    Son of Louis VI, reigned from 1137.


    Philip II (1165- 1223)
    Son of Louis VII, reigned from 1180.


    Louis VIII "The LionHeart" (1187 - 1226) Son of Louis VIII, reigned From 1223.


    Louis IX (1214-1270)
    Son of Louis VIII and the leader of two crusades 1248 and 1270, ascended to the throne at the age of 12 with his mother as Regent. Louis was canonised in 1297 by Pope Boniface V III.


    Philip III (1245 - 1285)
    Son of Louis X, reigned from 1270.


    Philip IV (1268- 1314)
    Son of Philip III, reigned from 1285.


    Louis X (1289- 1316)
    Son of Philips IV, reigned from 1314.




    67

    John Mean) 1 (November 13, 1316 - November 19, 1316)
    Never succeeded to the throne, obviously, but still was of the bloodline.


    Philip V (1293- 1322)
    Nephew of Charles IV, and of the Capetian House of Valois, reigned from 1328.


    John II (1319-1364)
    Son of P h i l i p VII, reigned from 1350 until his capture at the battle of Poitiers in 1356 and subsequent imprisonment at the hands of the English. The English released h i m in 1360. Whereafter he stayed to die in London in 1364.


    Charles V (1337 - 1380)
    Son of John II, he took over the government on his father's imprisonment in 1356 and the throne from 1364.


    Charles VI (1368- 1422)
    Son of Charles V, reigned from 1380 until his insanity took over in 1392.


    Charles VII (1403- 1461)
    Son of Charles VI, reigned from 1422.


    Louis XI (1423- 1483)
    Son of Charles VII, came to the throne in 1461.


    Charles VIII (1470-1498)
    Succeeded his father Louis XI as King in 1483.


    Louis Xll (1462- 1 5 I 5 )
    Son of Charles, the Duke of Orleans, and succeeded Charles V III, a distant cousin in 1498.


    Francis I (1494- 1547)
    Became King in 1515 upon the death of Louis XII (his cousin and father-in-law).


    Charles IX (1550- 1574)
    Came to the throne in 1560 upon the death of his brother. Francis II.


    Henry III (1550- 1589)
    Brother of Charles IX, reigned from 1574.


    Henry IV (1553- 1 6 1 0 )
    Son of Antione, Duke of Vendome, and of the House of Bourbon, reigned from 1589.


    Louis XIII (1601 -1643)
    Son of Henry IV, reigned from 1610.


    Louis XIV ("The Great", "The Sun King") (1638 - 1715) Son of Louis XIII, reigned from 1643.


    Louis XV (1710- 1774)
    Great-Grandson of Louis XIV, reigned from 1715 to 1774.
    THE BLOODLINE RE-MARRIED! Louis XVI (1754- 1793)
    Came to the French throne on May 10, 1774. four years after his marriage to Marie Antoinette. Reigned until
    his death at the hands of the French Revolutionaries on January 2 1 , 1793.






    68

    Marie Antoinette (1755 - 1793)
    Brought the bloodline l i n e back to the French side when she married the French King Louis XVI in 1770. Their son would be the continuance of the bloodline of the Merovingian Dynasty. In 1785 their son Louis was born. She was guillotined for "treason" by the French Revolutionaries on October 16, 1793.


    Louis XVII (1785- 1860)
    Refer to chapter The Lost French Dauphin

  17. #17

  18. #18
    THE CATHOLIC CHURCH




    Who created the Catholic Church? I have a really hard time believing that it was the disciples of Jesus. The church has never taught the true message that Jesus was teaching to the disciples and the masses of people.


    The only conclusion that makes any sense is that the Catholic Church is a duel church. We know that the Catholic Church has what is called a "White Pope" and a "Black Pope". In simple terms this must mean that there is the public and the hidden agendas of the church. The public view is in charge of false teachings, brainwashing and misleading of the people. The hidden agendas of the church that, "the good Catholic common folk" have no idea exist, under the outward cover" of the church, is all evil. Up until Jesus time in the ancient writings there is a flood of information on the Scribes and Pharisees. After Jesus left they quickly disappeared and the Holy Roman Catholic Church appeared, suddenly. Could it be that the Jewish Scribes and Pharisees are the ones that really created the Catholic Church just to control the people to prevent them from evolving with the teachings that Jesus brought to earth. It is now known from the angles that are communicating with man that Jesus disciples and some followers were able to do the same miracles that Jesus could do. There are even people that ascended the same as Jesus. Refer to the chapter on "The Apotheosis Project."


    No government, nor church can control people that are limitless and can manifest anything, food, water, clothing and shelter with a focused thought. That is why a corrupt church and government work well together because together they have for 2000 years systematically killed off everyone that they thought was remotely close to practicing Jesus' teachings l i k e the group known as the "Albigensians". It is the "Jewish Khazars" that are pushing the corruptness and complete annihilation of the 12 lost tribes the Gentiles as the Talmud refers to them. As for our United States government, the "Khazar Jews" have been systematically for the last 25 years scarfing up every position in congress. After studying the Talmud and the Kabbalah and the doctrines of the llluminati it is easy to understand why our government is writing laws of such "Atrocity Levels" to be used on the unsuspecting Anglo-American citizens.


    The "Christian" religions sprang (obviously) out of the life of Jesus, and from the subsequent activities of his disciples. From the times of the earliest writings that are today formed into the compendium colloquially known as the Bible, there were many forms of this so-called Christian religion, and they did not always agree with each other, even down to such fundamentals as to who (or what) Jesus really was, as well as to how their various religious rituals were to be practiced, and how their doctrines (and dogmas) were to be disseminated. The Romans sacked Jerusalem in A.D. 70, and most of the writings concerning these "Christian" religions were lost. What today survives to form the current Bible's New Testament was written, at the earliest, from between the years of 65 A.D. to around 100 A. D., about 32 to 67 years after the crucifixion. The majority of the "Christian" writings, or, at least the religious writings of the time which did survive, with the obvious exception of the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Nag Hammadi Scripts, ended up in the hands of the Roman Catholic church, and it made use of those writings to its greatest advantage.


    From its lowly start the Roman Catholic church grew and developed, influencing members of the Roman Senate and the rulers of other neighboring lands to such an extent that Rome itself gave over a significant part of Rome to the Church, which part of the old city is still to this day a separate and autonomous, tax free State within the boundaries of the City of Rome, in the country of Italy, called and known as Vatican City.


    Around 250 A.D.. the Roman Catholic Church emerged as the biggest and most powerful organized "Christian" religion. It began to infiltrate and destroy, or overcome, and absorb, the many and variegated "Christian" sects and religious organizations, and also began trying to eradicate some of the more ancient religious beliefs, mainly through the "re-education" of the proponents of such religions, or through the destruction or the confiscation and subsequent hiding of ancient "biblical texts" and other religious and historical manuscripts.


    In the fourth Century, Emperor Augustine (354-430) virtually re-wrote both the bible and the "laws" of the Roman Catholic church, and the basic tenets, doctrines and philosophies of the Roman Catholic Church still to this day reflect his beliefs, namely ( i ) that God is a being that is outside of each human being, (ii) that only the



    70

    Grace of God could change a person's sinful ways, and that only certain people would be chosen by God to be given that particular dispensation, and that ( iii) people could only be considered to receive this divine Grace if they were a member of the Roman Catholic Church and received the sacraments. Anyone who was not with the Church had to be against it.


    To ensure the growth of the Church, it embarked upon a campaign against people and countries which was to continue, on and off, and in many forms, for many centuries.


    Anyone who did not belong to the Roman Catholic church and who did not conform to the tenets and edicts of the Roman Catholic church could be accused of heresy. The charge of "Heresy" or of being a "heretic" could be leveled against anyone from noble to serf. The doctrines of the Catholic Church were regarded as God's Law, and therefore formed the basis of Man's Law. and therefore the charge of heresy was a charge leveled not only by the Church, as a charge that the individual's beliefs did not conform with the doctrines of the Church, and therefore God, but also it was a charge of criminal activities or even treason against the State, and the poor wretch had to answer to both. Even the lowly priest had to be careful, he, more than anyone, as a member of the Church, had to conform or suffer the same consequences. Thus the Roman Catholic church acted not only as "God's police force", but also as the police force of the State, and, in most places, the Country. All of these "ministrations" of the Roman Catholic Church, being presided over by the careful and watchful eye of the presiding Church dignitary, depending upon the jurisdiction, from a bishop or cardinal up through the ranks of the Church to the Pope himself.


    By the eleventh century their main objective was realized in that almost everybody in the "civilized world" generally was either (a) ignorant as to the prior existence of any form of Christian religion other than the Roman Catholic Church, or (b) was too afraid to enter into any form of private discussion of the matter of other religions, leave alone start a public debate or argument about it. The Crusades changed all that.


    The Crusades


    The official reason of the time as to why the first Crusade to the Holy Land was undertaken is that as a result of the interference with travelers and pilgrims by the Turks, and the fact that the Islamic Turks were in the "Holy Land" at all. Pope Urban I I . in a council of churchmen and noblemen at Clermont, France, in 1095, called for good (Roman Catholic) Christians to rescue the Holy Land from the clutches of the barbarous Turks, priests took up the cause, spreading the message through their Churches and thousands of "good Christian people" volunteered to fight and die for the Roman Catholic cause.


    The first Crusade of 1096, was led by the Norman Knights, Godfrey de Bouillon, Count Robert of Flanders, Count Raymond of Toulouse, Bohemund. etc., etc... These Knights eventually conquered Jerusalem, and caused Godfrey de Bouillon to be "crowned" as head of the newly created (and re-liberated) Kingdom of Jerusalem. Of these Norman Knights, Godfrey de Bouillon could trace and prove his lineage and ancestry directly back to King Merovee, patriarch of the Merovingian Dynasty of French Kings, and one of the first Kings of France (the Franks) in 417 A.D..


    The reasons as to why these particular Knights went to the Holy Land is s t i ll somewhat obscure, but for the purposes of this chapter, suffice it to say, for the moment, that the scrolls discovered amidst the caves at Qumran. near the Dead Sea. in 1947, and, more particularly the copper scrolls discovered thereafter, along with the known travels of Joseph of Aramathea and Mary Magdalene after the crucifixion, may give the astute researcher several hints as to how this Crusade alone returned from the holy land with "great treasures and knowledge and wealth", while thousands of participants in the subsequent Crusades died, either while trying to get to the holy land, or at the hands of the Turks when they got there, or while trying to escape back to their homelands and more particularly the clues as to why subsequent Crusades were nowhere near as "successful".


    In 1187, the Turks recaptured Jerusalem, prompting the third Crusade which was to take King Richard into the "holy land", leaving Prince John in charge (on the English Throne) and which also caused the creation and the signing of the Magna Carta.


    Part of the "Knowledge" brought back from the Holy Land by the first and subsequent Crusades was to eventually trickle down to the general public and would seriously challenge and undermine the religious


    71

    authority of the Roman Catholic Church. Knowledge and. above that, proof, came down to the masses that there had. indeed, been all kinds of "Christian" religions, and the Roman Catholic Church had not been the
    only one.
    The "Pagan" Religions


    When the Romans, under J u l i u s Caesar, conquered Europe. France and England (between 58 and 54 B.C.), they found various cultures which had. for more than a thousand years, practiced a so-called "pagan" types of astrological religion, worshipping Sun, Moon, Stars and Earth. The Gauls and Celts were predominantly farmers, relying on such astrological calendars as stonehenge and other Pre-civilization monoliths and burial grounds which were strewn all around France and England to tell them when to plant and sow and reap their harvest. Which just is not the truth about these objects but. the pagan religions thus practiced in this way a life and means of survival.


    Given that the Roman religion itself was based on the worship of multiple Gods, the old pagan religions of the European theater did not pose much of a threat, and the two types of religion cohabited in harmony, until the advent of the Roman Catholic Church, and the new knowledge gleaned from the Crusades.


    Religious persecution


    At the beginning of the twelfth century, the "Dark Ages" or "Inquisition" began in Europe and in 1215, with their new found freedom granted by the Magna Carta, the Church started a new type of program closely allied to the inquisition, but with a new twist. The focus was s t i l l mainly on heretics, but now the net broadened to include those members of the general populace who had any direct or indirect knowledge of an "old Pagan" pre-Christian religion as well as the more modernistic persons who practiced or preached any of the new Christian (non-Catholic) religions.


    Thus began the era of the "Witch Hunts", or the "Dark Ages".


    The Witch Hunts


    This was an age reigned over by the terror of the Roman Catholic Church which was to last more than two hundred years. The Roman Catholic Church declared that any one who was s t i l l practicing any "old" religion had to be working for Satan and was. therefore, either a witch, or a warlock. The same accusation as had been leveled for centuries were again leveled from nobleman to serf, but this time the accusation was not heresy, but that of being a witch (female), or warlock (male).


    Some very nasty trials and horrible tortures were devised to fine out if an accused "Witch" or "Warlock" was engaged in the "pagan practice of the devil's work". To be merely accused as a witch or warlock was quite l i t e r a l l y the signing of your death warrant, and a l l done in the name of God, the Holy Roman Church, the King, the Country and, of course, for the "salvation" of the people from eternal damnation (of not belonging to the Roman Catholic church, and/or the learning of the truth?). Don't you know the truth will set you free really! And the church could not have that.


    A group of men, headed by the "Witch finder", usually a self proclaimed expert or dignitary of the church, and the local Baron or Earl would ride into a village and announce a "witch hunt", and they had some very bizarre ways of finding a "witch" or "Warlock".


    Torture


    In many cases, this self appointed inquisition would single out two or three of the persons of the village, or even their own priest, who would be questioned (and even tortured and maimed) in order to find out which members of the village would be most likely to be found to be a witch or heretic. Some horrific systems and instruments of torture were devised specifically for this "religious trial". Inevitably, someone, while being tortured, would scream the name of one, if not several of their friends and neighbors who the inquisition could then question (and torture) and subsequently find to be a witch or heretic.






    72

    Victims


    Anyone who was thought to be a little abnormal (mentally retarded or "touched") or just a little strange, if someone in the village simply didn't l i k e you, or an old maid or widow who lived alone and practiced herbal remedies, a particularly beautiful young woman who was thought to have the power to "bewitch" the young men of the village, anyone with a birthmark or freckles, anyone who was crippled from birth by a strange disease (Spina bifida, polio, downs syndrome etc.,), or who had a strange disease or malady (leprosy, epilepsy), or was known to have an animal (a black cat or dog) which could be a "familiar", even someone who just showed they were "too scared" of the witch finder, everybody could be accused of being possessed, bewitched, or of being of an old "Pagan" faith, and would be subjected to the two specific tests of the trial.


    The Trial


    The first thing that would happen was that the accused unfortunates would be brought out into the village square and the whole village population would have to witness t h e "witch bane".


    One by one the accused would be stripped naked, placed on a special table, and subjected to a most intimate and undignified search, the object of which was to find the "mark of the devil'" this mark could be a wound scar, a birthmark, a mole, or a spot or pimple.


    When a mark was found, and one usually was, the accused would then have to undergo the test of the bodkin. This was a needle approximately twelve inches long which would be stuck into the unfortunate victim in and around the devil's mark. If the victim did not feel the needle, or the puncture did not bleed, then he or she was definitely a witch. Some of these needles were in a sliding handle, so the witch finder could make it look like the needle was going into the victim when it was not, and the people would declare her a witch at once. A little pressure could be applied to the exit wound so that it did not bleed, automatically he or she was a witch. There were many tricks to the witch finder's trade, and he rarely left a village without killing two or three people.


    When, the victim had been declared a witch, the witch finder, as per the victims "constitutional rights", had to conduct a proper trial. The jury was the whole village. The prosecution had to find out if the Good Lord would redeem the soul of this unfortunate wretch. The defense was the Good Lord himself.


    Test 2


    If the village had a village pond, the victim had to go to the "dunking stool", a device like a child's see-saw, with a chair tied to one end. The naked victim was tied into the stool and submerged in the freezing water for very long periods of time, up to fifteen minutes, and never for less than three time. If he or she drowned, then the Good Lord had obviously decided to spare his lamb from this torment and had taken his or her soul to himself.


    Test 3


    When the village was in a h illy area, then the victim was taken to the top of one of the hills, and encased in a barrel, through the outside of which the villagers drove large nails, and the barrel, with the victim now inside, was allowed to roll down the hill. Again, as with the dunking stool, if the victim died, the Good Lord had taken his soul.


    If, by some freak of nature, the unfortunate accused survived this torment, then it was obvious that the devil was in her, or him, for no mortal could possibly have endured it. That was absolute proof of guilt, and the victim was convicted and sentenced.


    Sentence


    The sentence, in either case, when convicted of being a Witch or Warlock, has to be burned alive at the stake, and this done in public in the village square. Either way, to be accused was to die horribly.




    73

    Quite obviously, to live in this age was to live in dread and fear of either mutilation or death at the hands of any of the over zealous "witch finders" of the day.


    By the turn of the fifteenth century, most, but not all of these inquisitions had fizzled out. Society was, from our modern day standpoint, till in very sick shape, but even with this type of society England and Europe gradually prospered and grew more civilized. When Columbus returned from his 1492 voyage of discovery and told the people of the new world in the West, they started again to dream.


    74

  19. #19
    THE OATH OF THE JESUITS AND
    THE KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS




    FOUND IN THE CONGRESSIONAL RECORD HOUSE, 1913, PAGE 3216




    I , now in the presence of Almighty God, the blessed
    Virgin Mary, the blessed St. John the Baptist, the Holy Apostles, St. Peter and St. Paul, and all the saints, sacred host of heaven, and to you, my Ghostly Father, the superior general of the Society of Jesus founded by Ignatius Loyola, in the pontification of Paul the III an continued to the present, do by the womb of the Virgin, the matrix of God, and the rod of Jesus Christ, declare and swear that his holiness the Pope, is Christ's vice regent and is the true and only head of the Catholic or Universal Church throughout the earth; and that by virtue of the keys of binding and loosing given his holiness by my Savior, Jesus Christ, he hath power to depose heretical kings, princes, States, Commonwealths, and Governments and they may be safely destroyed. Therefore to the utmost of my power I will defend this doctrine and his holiness's right and custom against all usurpers of the heretical or Protestant authority whatever, especially the Lutheran Church of Germany, Holland, Denmark, Sweden, and Norway and the now pretended authority and Churches of England and Scotland, and the branches of same now established in Ireland and on the Continent of America and elsewhere, and all adherents in regard that they may be usurped and heretical, opposing the sacred Mother Church of Rome.


    I do now denounce and disown any allegiance as due to any heretical king, prince, or State, named Protestant or Liberals, or obedience to any of their laws, magistrates, or officers.


    I do further declare that the doctrine of the Churches of England and Scotland, of the Calvinists, Huguenots, and others of the name of Protestants or Masons to be damnable, and they themselves to be damned who will not forsake the same.


    I do further declare that I will help assist, and advise all or any of his Holiness's agents, in any place where I should be. in Switzerland, Germany, Holland, Ireland, or America, or in any other kingdom or territory I shall come to and do my utmost to extirpate the heretical Protestant or Masonic doctrines and to destroy all their pretended powers, legal or otherwise.


    I do further promise and declare that, notwithstanding I am dispensed with to assume any religion heretical for the propagation of the Mother Church's interest to keep secret and private all her agents' counsels from time to time, as they in trust me and not divulge, directly or indirectly, by word, writing, or circumstances whatever but to execute all that should be proposed, given in charge or discovered unto me by my Ghostly Father, or any of this sacred order.


    I do further promise and declare that I will have no opinion or will of my own or any mental reservation whatsoever, even as a corpse or cadaver, but will unhesitatingly obey each and every command that I may receive from my superiors in the militia of the Pope and of Jesus Christ.






    75

    That I will go to any part of the world wheresoever I may be sent, to the frozen regions north, jungles of India, to the centers of civilization of Europe, or to the wild haunts of the barbarous savages of America whatsoever is communicated to me.


    I do further promise and declare that I will, when opportunity presents, make and wage relentless war, secretly and openly against all heretics, Protestants and Masons, as I am directed to do to extirpate them from the face of the whole earth; and that I will spare neither age, sex, or condition, and that will hang, burn, waste, boil, flay, strangle, and bury alive these infamous heretics; rip up the stomachs and wombs of their women, and crush their infants' heads against the walls in order to annihilate their execrable race. That when the same can not be done openly, I will secretly use the poisonous cup, the strangulation cord the steel of the poniard, or the leaden bullet, regardless of the honor, rank, dignity, or authority of the persons, whatever may be their condition in life, either public or private, as I at any time may be directed so to do by any agents of the Pope or superior of the Brotherhood of the Holy father of the Society of Jesus.


    In confirmation of which I hereby dedicate my life, soul, and all corporal powers, and with the dagger which I now receive I will subscribe my name written in my blood in testimony thereof; and should I prove false or weaken in my determination, may my brethren and fellow soldiers of the militia of the Pope cut off my hands and feet and my throat from ear to ear, my belly opened and sulfur burned therein with all the punishment that can be inflicted upon me on earth and my soul shall be tortured by demons in eternal hell forever.


    That I will in voting always vote for a Knight of Columbus in preference to a Protestant, especially a Mason, and that I will leave my party so to do; that if two Catholics are on the ticket I will satisfy myself which is the better supporter of Mother Church and vote accordingly.


    That I will not deal with or employ a Protestant if in my power to deal with or employ a Catholic. That I will place Catholic girls in Protestant families that a weekly report may be made of the inner movements of the heretics.


    That I will provide myself with arms and ammunition that I may be in readiness when the word is passed, or I am commanded to defend the church either as an individual or with the militia of the Pope.



    All of which I,

    , do swear by the blessed Trinity and

    blessed sacrament which I am now to receive to perform and on part to keep this, my oath.


    In testimony hereof, I take this most holy and blessed Sacrament of the Eucharist and witness the same further with my name written with the point of this dagger in my own blood and seal in the face of this Holy Sacrament.




    76

  20. #20
    IGNATIUS LOYOLA, JESUITS,
    THE ILLUMINATI AND THE CREATOR




    Ignatius Loyola (1495-1556), was a Roman Catholic religious leader who founded the Society of Jesus. Members of this religious order of men are known a s Jesuits.


    Ignatius was born into an aristocratic Basque family near Azpeitia, Spain. His real name was Inigo de Loyola. In
    1516, Ignatius became a soldier in the army of the Duke of Najera. While fighting the French at Pamplona in
    1521, Ignatius suffered severe wounds. During his long period of recovery, he read a book about the life of Jesus and stories about the saints, these books convinced him that he should abandon his life of ambition and pleasure. After his recovery, he went to the Benedictine monastery of Montserrat, near Barcelona. There, he hung up his sword at the altar of the Virgin Mary and dedicated himself to a spiritual life.


    During much of 1522 and 1523, Ignatius lived in a cave near Manresa, where he prayed and subjected himself to many physical discomforts. During this time, he underwent mystical experiences. Ignatius drew on these experiences when he wrote Spiritual Exercises, a manual of self-discipline and prayer.


    To prepare himself for the priesthood. Ignatius studied humanities and theology in Paris from 1528 to 1535. In
    1534, he and six other men formed the Society of Jesus. The group took vows of poverty and chastity, the men also vowed to go to the Holy Land. Ignatius was ordained a priest in 1537. He and the other Jesuits then went to Rome to offer their services to the pope.


    Pope Paul III approved the Society of Jesus in 1540. Ingnatius became its first superior general (head). He also wrote the order's constitutions, which established the Jesuits' organization and way of life.


    Under the leadership of Ignatius, the Jesuits helped reform the church during a self-renewal movement called the
    "The Reformation and Counter Reformation ".


    The following information is at no way aimed at the innocent common church people that attend the Catholic- Church. This information is about the behind doors activities that are active behind the outward appearance of the church.


    THE REFORMATION AND COUNTER REFORMATION


    Medieval Christian civilization ended with the Reformation, a religious revolution that gave birth to the Protestant religion in the 1500's. (This Protestant religion was not at all what it is toady because of the continued interference and adulteration by the Catholic Church and the Jesuits). As a result of the Reformation, Europe became divided between Roman Catholic and Protestant countries. The Reformation also led the Catholic Church to reform itself in a movement called the Counter Reformation. By the early 1500's. the conditions in the church that led to the Reformation were apparent. The papacy was dominated by temporal concerns. The Roman Curia was incredibly corrupt. Many bishops lived like princes and ignored the faithful. A great number of clergymen were ignorant and neglected their pastoral duties. Members of religious orders had become worldly. Fear and superstition were common among the laity. The liturgy no longer held much meaning or inspiration for the people, and theology had generally become dry and unproductive.


    Many councils, popes, saints, scholars, and movements among the people had attempted to reform the church during the late Middle Ages. However, the church remained largely unreformed.


    THE COUNTER REFORMATION


    The counter reformation was the Roman Catholic Church's self-reforming reaction to the Protestant Reformation.
    It is usually understood as extending from about the mid-1500's to the end of the Thirty Years' War (1618-1648). Indications of the church's move toward reform appear in the activities of three religious orders founded from
    1524 to 1530 the Barnabites. Capuchins, and Theatines. Members of these orders tried to reform Catholic life through missionary and charitable work and by leading deeply religious lives.



    77

    A number of religious wars broke out during the Counter Reformation. Between 1562 and 1598, the Catholic majority in France and French Protestants called Huguenots fought eight civil wars called the Wars of Religion. The Thirty Years' War destroyed much of Germany. The war began as a civil war between Protestant and Catholics in the German states but eventually involved most European countries. The Peace of Westphalia, which ended the war in 1648, declared that the people of each state must follow the religion of their ruler.


    During the mid and late 1700's several nations banned the Jesuit Order from their country and colonies. Portugal banned the Jesuits in 1759, France in 1764, and Spain in 1767. In 1773, pressure from Catholic rulers helped force Pope Clement XIV to suppress the Jesuits in all countries.


    The Jesuits were banned for several reasons. Some Catholic rulers and churchmen were jealous of the order's influence. Some accused the Jesuits of accumulating too much power and wealth. Gallicans opposed the orders' complete devotion to the pope and the church.


    THE ILLUMINATI


    The Illuminati or Illuminism is the name tagged onto earth's oldest and most secret of societies. Some regard them as societies in the worship of witchcraft, magic, Satan and evil, which is the dark side of man. The Illuminati is credited with keeping the ancient wisdom that has been handed down through the generations as far back as the origination of the pyramids. However, there are some who hold today that the Illuminati is a front for the Roman Catholic Church to unite the world under her banner once again. (Take control of the world again is what they mean to say).


    But this side of Illuminism that goes back to the origin of the pyramids was dedicated to being the keepers of enlightenment, the teachers of truth and righteousness, the illuminated and humans of higher knowledge and intelligence, the miracle workers. So down through time, many different secret groups have been hidden from the public eye, not because all were a secret group of worshipers of witchcraft, Satanism and the dark side of humanity, but it was for their very lives they met in secrecy because their teachings and knowledge were not openly accepted by society.


    The group that we are most concerned within this text is the Illuminati of Bavaria. This secret order was founded by and Ex-Jesuit priest and professor of Canon (Jewish) Law at Ingolstadt University in Bavaria on May 1,1776, by Adam Weishaupt. His secret society was founded on the Lucifer Rebellion and worship, the expert practice of witchcraft and the occult in general, the dark side of world domination. It is believed that this order was created to carry on the Jesuits covert activities outside of the church.


    When Pope Clement annulled the Jesuit order in 1773 because the Jesuits were meddling in the affairs of the state and were considered enemies of the government.


    At a time close to this, that a more powerful outside force behind the scene and always unknown to anyone other than the keepers of a dastardly secret plan to help Weishaupt, the catholic Church and a secret society with the capability of their help and an agreement between them for the eventual control of the world economies and all its people. We will refer to this outside force as the Lucifer Rebellion.


    The Lucifer Rebellion only desire was for world control and domination and the subservience of man. With the information gathered, their plan could undermine and control a l l religions and undermine all governments through a super secret society which operated out of the public's sight. There are some who hold today that the Bavarian Illuminati is a front for the Roman Catholic church to unite the world under her banner again and that makes a lot of sense. In August 1814, Pope Pius VII overruled Clement's action and reinstated the Jesuits to all of their former rights and privileges so they could go back to doing just what they were doing before. By now, Weishaupt's secret society and plans were well under way.


    The Great Scarlet Whore in the Book of Revelations is the Catholic Church and is a false religious system that caused the Protestants to flee from the old European countries to come to the New Jerusalem.


    78

    Consider the great power that the peoples of the world are being subjected to; the Lucifer Rebellion which is in force to bring the people of the world to complete subservience; the Roman Catholic Church, the Illuminati and the changed, adulterated Protestant Church.


    When the Roman Catholic Church became a religious dictatorship, it was seen as "church and state," one in the same. We know that there were many struggles between the original teachings of Jesus and the rules of slate that the mother church of the Christians had to contend with the true scriptures and teaching of Jesus were hidden from the vast population. We know that the Emperor Justinian of the Second Congress of Constantinople played a big part in changing and altering the true scriptures, because the teachings offended him and new catechisms were substituted instead of the truth. The one teaching that he did away with is that we all live many lives and reincarnate millions of times on our journey for wisdom. The gospel of the Bible, or true teachings, became altered and had mingled into it ignorance, superstition, worship, hatred, divisions of people, war, controlled pagan philosophies and the Catholic Church started worshipping the Virgin Mary, Harmony, freedom and unconditional love were done away with also and the truth that we really are all God's children, one with the creator of the all was removed. The Catholic Church has for all this time hidden the truth.


    Romanism perverted the gospel, but there were still a few people who were teaching the true faith during the 1260 years that the Catholic Church cast the truth to the ground.


    Those faithful people who proclaimed the sacred truth that Jesus came and taught us that were not murdered had to flee for their lives from the wrath of the Catholic Church's Inquisitors. The true faith was forced to go underground, and in the true sense of the word, that is where your cults or occults came from it simply means "hidden knowledge" for their very lives. It was so they could continue to study the secrets of the cosmology and the life force that created everyone of us. which is God, and who we really are and why we are here.


    That is what true illuminated people are all about-loving the essence of the God within us and the creator of everything and all of the possibilities and probabilities of the vastness called God. Most people today, because of the church, are so far removed from the creator that is within each of us, and that was the plan of the Lucifer Rebellion from the beginning of their interfering plans. Through separation from knowledge of truth you give your powers away to something outside of you.




    Now the Bavarian Illuminati had another plan, but they are all working toward the same end result, total world control and domination. The secret revolutionary force that had its beginning in the French Revolution is just another tool of the Lucifer Rebellion and is using this tool to further the plan to establish eventual total rule of the world. In the book of Revelations, the only scripture that is, for the most part intact, predicted to unite the Scarlet Whore which is the Catholic Church and everyone else that has been drawn into its lies and deceptions. And everyone is supposed to fall subject to the ultimate plan of world domination and control.




    You need to take a close look at the inside history of the French Revolution and study the subversive groups that actually caused the revolt. It began around 1788, give or take a year. It was actually planned by the Illuminati and Adam Weishaupt almost 20 years before the revolution took place. While in the background, the Lucifer Rebellion were doing their subliminal works to incite Napoleon.


    Weishaupt's Illuminati plan to crush governments, while the House of Rothschild provided the money for their secret society, was working very well and this was just the first of many.


    Weishaupt began to write down his plan to destroy all governments and religions. Atheism was to be used a s a tool to destroy the Catholic Church, which then was the controlling power in Europe. He adopted the Jesuit system of espionage and introduced the dark side of the human to his followers and developed a fraternity within his political movement that was akin to the freemasonry. After he formed his organization, with financial backing from the House of Rothschild, he adopted the name, Illuminati.


    Weishaupt taught his disciples that the Illuminati were the only members of the human race who were truly enlightened and knew "what it's all about." Weishaupt had his followers believing that they were to be the cream


    79

    of the intelligentsia, or the only people with the mental capacity, the knowledge, the insight and understanding necessary to govern the world and bring peace. However, only a few of his chosen members actually knew Weishaupt personally, and he was regarded by those who had not seen him almost as a god.


    Weishaupt recruited into his Illuminati organization as many young men of wealth and position as possible. Within four or five years, Weishaupt's Illuminati became very powerful and even had his members directing the affairs of Germany. Weishaupt's goal was to hid the sciences of witchcraft behind philanthropy, destroy Christianity with humanism (atheism), then set up a One World government of New World Order, with the following major goals:


    1. Abolition of all ordered governments
    2. Abolition of private property.
    3. Abolition of all inheritance.
    4. Abolition of all religion.
    5. Abolition of patriotism.
    6. Abolition of the family.
    7. Creation of a New World Order.


    Weishaupt. who was only 28 when he founded the Order of the Illuminati on May 1, 1776, did not make much progress until he met a high-ranking freemason named Baron Von Knigge. Von Knigge was not only a high ranking freemason, but he also had been admitted as a master of most of the secret societies of this day. Von Knigge was, like Weishaupt and all masters of these particular types of secret societies, and expert occultist.


    To spread his Order and give the Illuminati higher influence in the world, and because freemasonry is akin to Illuminism, Weishaupt connected with the Masonic Institution. He was initiated in 1777 into freemasonry at a lodge in Munich that he planned to use to promote his world revolutionary ideas. Baron Von Knigge joined Weishaupt's Order in 1780 and soon became a leader, dividing with Weishaupt the control and direction of the Order.


    The world accepts freemasonry as a Great Benevolent society, teaching the highest possible degree of morality and virtue. Since freemasonry enjoyed prestige and honor, Weishaupt and Von Knigge planned a world takeover by using the Fraternal Order of Freemasonry. Their plan was to penetrate into the high levels of the order, then take control in directing the affairs of the nations into an eventual New World Order or One World Government. Since the Catholics, Christianity was both church and state and had been the dominating power that the Lucifer Rebellion was using to control the affairs of the world in Weishaupt's time. The rebellion used this controlling and domineering influence that would gradually unite all paganism, teaching false truths, with Christianity and all governments of the world under one controlling government.


    Weishaupt's first step was, however, to get control of the International Order of Freemasonry. In order to gain control of the order, Weishaupt and Von Knigge tried to sell the leaders of freemasonry on the idea that their Order of the Illuminati had a higher, much older and more mysterious system than any of the higher degrees of masonry.


    The plan for world take over was to operate under cover as long as possible, and when the gullible world finally found out it would be too late to stop them. The Illuminati was to be a secret society within the secret society of the freemasons, to stay hidden form the vast population.


    Voltaire, whose real name was Jean Francois Aronet, was educated by the Jesuits who later turned against Catholicism and helped promoted the philosophy of llluminism. Later, the Illuminist became fused into the same movement working to cause the French Revolution.


    In the United States, Benjamin Franklin, who knew Voltaire, was a leading figure in the Illuminati and ironically enough, the ideas of the movement formed the background to the Declaration of Independence. We were very fortunate in that this confusion was not molded into the Declaration of Independence and a protective shield against both civil and religious persecution was formulated.






    80

    THE FRENCH REVOLUTION


    There may have been many minor reasons why France became a habitation of atheists during the French revolution with its three and one-half year "Reign of Terror." However, it actually began because of the Roman Catholic suppression of the true scriptures that Jesus taught. Jesus did not preach as originally set forth in the gospel. Jesus was misrepresented among the vast multitudes in France. Because of the false presentation of the gospel by the Catholic Church suppressing the true scriptures, the tyranny and fanaticism, an army of atheists was able to gain sympathy for their cause, and the Lucifer influence was able to make war on the scriptures and overcome it. This is the reason the Catholic Church lost its dictatorial power. This set the stage for not only destroying Christianity in France at that time, but also set the stage for the forces of France to march into Vatican City and dethrone the Pope when Napoleon came on the scene after the revolution.


    Writers have hailed the French Revolution as the dawning of a new era, but it actually was the birth of another terrible deception with the masterminding originally coming from the Lucifer Rebellion.


    Before you can understand how Illuminism, Catholicism and Protestantism shall go forth into the world to unite them against the true teachings of Jesus, we needed to know what name the llluminati is operating under today.


    As stated before, Weishaupt connected with the Masonic Lodge in 1777. He posed at First among the freemasons as a reformer in religion and a liberal in politics. Because freemasonry was also anti-Catholic, Weishaupt's anti- Catholic policies in Germany became popular immediately. Weishaupt enrolled no less than two thousand names upon the llluminati register in Germany. Among those were names of the most distinguished aristocrats of the country.


    It is quite apparent the men of the Order of Freemasonry who joined Weishaupt's llluminati had no idea of what **** they had fallen into. Very few masons understood what Weishaupt's plans were in the beginning, as very few masons today understand what their own organization teaches. Weishaupt penetrated into the freemasonry organization with all the shrewdness and subtlety that he learned from once being a Jesuit priest.


    Some historians have written that the French Revolution was not premeditated. Some will say that the French Revolution emerged only from political crisis that coincided with an economic breakdown. This economic breakdown generated unrest and riots which even the French army could not quell. It was this, some historians will agree, that made the people of France determined to cause a social change and overthrow their country.


    What these historians say is true in part only. The parts of history some historians fail to see or left out is actually what caused the people in the first place to accept this spirit of Illuminism? As stated before, it was the fanatical oppression of the Roman Catholic Church that actually generated the spark that eventually led the French people to reject Christianity and publicly burn their Bibles. History records that the events that led up to the French Revolution were caused by anarchy. The citizens became divided into a medley of hate factions that were struggling for power and trying to exterminate each other. But before this, it was the Roman Catholic Church who slaughtered French citizens by the thousands that kindled a hatred of Christianity. The murderous character of the Catholic Church was seen in France.


    In 1572 A.D., Roman Catholics tried in one sweep to murder all of the Protestants in France. This known in history as the St. Bartholomew Massacre. Within the space of one month, 60.000 Protestants are said to have been slain in France. All told, there were over 75,000. The Cardinal of Lorraine gave 1,000 crowns as a reward to the person who brought the news to the Vatican.


    During the revolution. France was reduced to a state of moral decay similar to that of the city of Sodom during Lot's time. It was from here that Illuminism began to emerge and overcome Christianity. History calls this movement of Illuminism the "Jacobin Clubs."


    The Jacobin Clubs in France were the aristocratic terrorists who spearheaded the French Revolution which sent King Louis XVI on January 21, 1793, to the guillotine. However, most historians leave out who was really giving orders to Dantor, Morat and Rabespierre, the leaders of the Jacobin Clubs. It was the Jacobin Clubs that actually abolished Christianity through the National Assembly and established the worship of the Goddess of Reason or Liberty.


    81

    The Jacobin Clubs were also known as the Society of the Friends of the Constitution and were soon organized in every important town in France. They were the most wealthy and influential people in France. They had as many as 500.000 members at the height of the influence in 1793-94.


    The truth is that this aristocratic terrorist movement called the Jacobin clubs was actually the French Illuminist operating under a different name.


    As established earlier, Weishaupt became a mason in 1777 for the sole purpose of using that organization as a tool for boring into the high levels of government by simply replacing freemasons who already sat in these positions.


    With an inexhaustible talent for charlatanry and a well planned system of espionage, Weishaupt's disciples infiltrated into the high levels of the governments in Germany, France, England. Belgium. Holland, Denmark, Sweden, Poland, Hungary and Italy. However, it was Baron Von Knigge who joined the Illuminati in 1780 that gave this organization its rapid expansion, not Weishaupt.


    Freemasons, like all secret societies, choose to remain obscure and do not like to attract attention. Because the Illuminati was a secret society within the secret society of Freemasonry, even though they had penetrated into the high levels of Europe, very few indeed ever heard of them. However, shortly before the revolution took place in France, two hard blows would land on the heads of Adam Weishaupt and his co-conspirators. The freemasons were not long in hearing rumors about the true nature of Weishaupt's plans to capture their whole organization. When the freemasons began to get wind of Weishaupt's true purpose, a chief council was held to examine the nature of the Illuminati by top ranking freemasons. A conference of masons was held in 1782 at which time Weishaupt and Von Knigge attended. But it wasn't until Weishaupt and Knigge had a falling out that led to Knigge's leaving the Order that began to have exposure and a threat of internal strife within the Illuminati.


    A contest between Weishaupt and Von Knigge about who was to be the king of this revolutionary movement was the real motive for Von Knigge leaving it. After Von Knigge left the Illuminati. the hardest blow to Weishaupt's society was received in 1785. when one of Weishaupt's co-conspirators named Lanze was struck by lightning while en route from Frankfurt, Germany, to deliver documents to Rabespierre, the head of the Jacobin Clubs at that time. The documents that Lanze was carrying had important information about the Order of the Illuminati and its plans of not only destroying the French government through riots and revolution, but also governments of the entire world as well.
    This is how we, today, have information about this mastermind plan and it all really originated way back with the Lucifer Rebellion. All of the papers Lanze was carrying fell into the hands of the Bavarian government, and the authorities ordered the police to raid the headquarters of the Illuminati in Germany. Adam Weishaupt had to escape for his life, and all documental evidence that the Order of the Illuminati was a dangerous international terrorist group was brought to the attention of many countries in Europe. However, the warnings fell on deaf ears as they will in our day.


    In 1785, the Bavarian government exposed Weishaupt's plan to destroy Christianity and control all world governments. However, this was not the end of the Illuminati, as most historians have written. Weishaupt's plans were only interrupted and dealt with as a dangerous revolutionary force in Germany.


    The other nations that the Illuminati were operating in did not heed the warning from the Bavarian government. Just a couple of years later, the plan to destroy Christianity and world governments was first seen in the French Revolution. This same revolutionary force reappeared again in Germany, called the "League of the Just," with branches in London, Brussels. Paris and Switzerland.


    When Napoleon came into power, he would not tolerate the activities of the Jacobin Clubs with their independent opposition, so he completely suppressed it. However, the Illuminati just operated under other names. It was under the name of the "League of the Just" that Karl Marx became a member. He was hired to update the writings of Adam Weishaupt. written seventy years earlier. Weishaupt died in 1830 but his revolutionary plans were carried on by a list of successors.


    In 1842, Karl Marx began to write revolutionary propaganda for the "League of the Just", Marx began to write the infamous "Manifest der Kommunistiche Partei," commonly know today as the "Communist Manifesto," which


    82

    appeared at the beginning of 1848. Later, the Illuminati, operating under the name of the "League of the Just", changed their name to the "League of the Communists."


    The communists celebrated May 1st as the birth of their revolutionary movement because it was the birthday of the llluminati which was founded by Weishaupt.


    It was Weishaupt and the House of Rothschild who started this partly religious and partly political movement foretold in prophecy in the book of Revelations. In the I890's. this world revolutionary movement added to its membership Vladimir Il y i c Ulyanov, who changed his name to Nicholoai Lenin. As the llluminati terrorist group in France (the Jacobin Clubs) caused the fall of the government of Louis XVI, so did their later aristocratic brethren operating under the name of Bolshevism caused the overthrow of the Tsar in Russian and caused the Russian Revolution in 1917. It well be shown later that these communists was financed by both European and American international bankers.



    83

Faqja 0 prej 7 FillimFillim 12 ... FunditFundit

Regullat e Postimit

  • Ju nuk mund tė hapni tema tė reja.
  • Ju nuk mund tė postoni nė tema.
  • Ju nuk mund tė bashkėngjitni skedarė.
  • Ju nuk mund tė ndryshoni postimet tuaja.
  •